illiniswish09
- Northwest Suburbs
Opening Line:
Illinois -11.5
Illinois -11.5
Link doesn't appear to be working for me, or I am too dumb to figure it out, lol ... any hints??https://www.news-gazette.com/wdws/
Not sure enough attention has been paid to the end of this WDWS podcast. Paul Klee hinting at what the issues are….
Thats a lotOpening Line:
Illinois -11.5
I think Illinois will end up winning this game, but given the way Iowa can score (and the terrible Illini defensive gameplans), I think there is extreme value for taking Iowa and the points.Opening Line:
Illinois -11.5
Beating double teams simply involves identifying them and getting the ball to the guy that's left open.Question for the coaches/insiders out there: What's the proper adjustment Illini coaches should be making to counter the blitzing double team opponents are throwing at KJ every time we try a high ball screen. It's been killing us for several games now. How should we counter it?
I think Brad indicated that Ivisic is back to practicing (for the first time in like a month). Jake is probably the only other in that circle.1. Did the Illini practice today?
2. If yes, how many players actually participated?
IOW, are we still sick?
Additionally, if the other three guys weren't so stuck in their spot they could get open. That really aggressive double makes it kind of hard to even hit the screener on the roll sometimes, which is why he usually doesn't roll all the way but does a short roll and catches a pass at the high post, then has a 2v1 or 3v2 with whoever is left over.Beating double teams simply involves identifying them and getting the ball to the guy that's left open.
Doubling off the pnr means initially the screener will be the open man. You can also do vary that set if teams are cheating where the screener can slip or ghost to create an open look. You could also the ballhandler start turning down some screens and attacking away from the double team.
Here's where the Illini are in a bit of a predicament though. Opposing teams are giving no respect to guys shooting 3s so a help defender can easily pick up the screener. Normally the screener would be able to kick for a wide open look but the Illini simply aren't hitting those looks.
So the adjustment that likely needs to be made is that whoever's guy leaves to help on the screener should be immediately cutting to the basket where he should have an open look.
For example, if KJ has the ball, Ivisic is the screener, and the help defender is guarding Boswell. When the defender guarding Ivisic doubles KJ, KJ should dump the ball to Ivisic, at the same time Boswells defender picks up Ivisic, so Boswell should attack that open space by cutting to the basket where Ivisic hopefully finds him for an open layup attempt.
Don't know if I explained that very well but that's how I would attack it.
Opening Line:
Illinois -11.5
fightingillini.com
Agree. This team is so broken. I’m taking Iowa and the points.I think this will be a close game. Really can’t believe the 11.5 spread. I don’t care if it’s a buzzer beater. We need a win badly
Sorry, it’s towards the end of the 2/22/25 Sportstalk. If you look for that link on there (won’t let me link directly). Klee said NBA people said KJ is not being put in thei right spots and doesn’t help that we have zero shooters. Also said that International players can take some yelling from coaches, but if /when they make it personal, the International players tend to tune out. He kept it kind of vague about that being the case, but it seemed like he was inferring itLink doesn't appear to be working for me, or I am too dumb to figure it out, lol ... any hints??
As for this game, my expectations for this season are absolutely zero now, but I am hanging on to two pipe dreams at this point, with the latter being the especially unrealistic one:
1. Beat Iowa in Champaign or die trying. It would extend the winning streak vs. Iowa to 3 games, and it would extend the streak in Champaign to 5 games. Fun fact, until we finally lost a home game to the Hawkeyes in Groce's second year, Iowa had lost 11 straight games in Champaign and 22 out of its last 23 games in Champaign entering the 2012 season. Let's at LEAST not slide all the way back into Groce Era futility, losing to mediocre Iowa teams on our home floor?!?!
2. Somehow, SOME way keep our hilarious winning streak vs. Michigan alive. It stands at 8 straight victories, dating all the way back to Ayo's clutch game winner in 2019-20. Given all of the drama with Juwan, Hunter and Michigan's asterisk title in 2020-21, it would just be oh so sweet if even during a seeming collapse, we could just extend that winning streak at least one more offseason, haha.
Lol, thanks for making me chucklePrior to his being cut from the church team, he might have done so. But now he's got nowhere else to play.
So that means Iowa is set to shoot about 50% tomorrow night. Sounds a little low, honestly. Won't be surprised if they shoot much better than that given our defensive "effort" lately.And in case anyone wants to chalk that up to luck, let's see how it compares to those teams' averages for the year...
Duke: 38.3% overall ... 52.2% vs. Illini ... 36% improvement
Wisconsin: 36.3% overall ... 41.7% vs. Illini ... 15% improvement
Michigan State: 29.6% overall ... 41.7% vs. Illini ... 41% improvement
UCLA: 35.5% overall ... 52.2% vs. Illini ... 47% improvement
Minnesota: 32.3% overall ... 40.0% vs. Illini ... 24% improvement
Rutgers: 33.7% overall ... 37.5% vs. Illini ... 11% improvement
Ohio State: 36.9% overall ... 47.8% vs. Illini ... 30% improvement
So yeah, during the whole stretch, our opponents are shooting about 29-30% better than they usually do just by virtue of going up against our defense.
While they might be cooking, it would appear they took their eye off the stove and burnt the pan. Might need to throw it away.Couple of things. We were told to be patient during recruiting that the staff was “cooking“. And by all accounts, we killed it recruiting now we are at a point where multiple fans are calling for the head of every Coach saying things like Coach has lost his fire he’s too soft.
Interestingly, one of the biggest strengths of Coach has been his ability to survive in adapt. My question is is this new Underwood where he’s more reserved, easier on the players just that. In the 2023 season multiple people suggested he was too hard. He needed to go easier on the young guys. Who’s to say this is not him adapting to that. Paul Klee said himself that you can’t coach the European players like you can American players. Reading between the lines that tells me he cannot get after them so is this “lack of fire“ just his adaptation to that?
I do agree that staffing changes need to happen. But I don’t think canning somebody fresh off in the lead is the answer. Period I highly doubt I’m in the minority in this thought process.
Is it just me or is Will just out there trying to get his and improve his draft stock? His defense is absolutely terrible. Hes made Tomi look horrible. I know Will would prolly never come back here atleast but he could severely use another year of college*whispers* is it time to start Will and make him option 1A offensively?
Or Mike LaTulip?Is Sean Harrington free to help us out with the x and o part?
Will is a phenom. Will has no fear, because he's having a blast. If he had any idea -- he hasn't -- how much WE think is on the line, he'd crumple under the pressure.Is it just me or is Will just out there trying to get his and improve his draft stock? His defense is absolutely terrible. Hes made Tomi look horrible. I know Will would prolly never come back here atleast but he could severely use another year of college