My biggest concern going into this game is that, in each of the last five games, we’ve controlled the tempo and the scoreboard, only to allow a late go-ahead or game-tying 4th quarter touchdown by our opponent. Once is happenstance, twice is a coincidence and three times is a trend. What is five? An established pattern, I guess.
That we’ve won three of those five games is nothing short of astounding.
To me it's just the established pattern of what happens in most close games... not evidence of some kind of lack of "clutchness" on defense. I posted this elsewhere but our D has made
tons of big stops the past 6 weeks:
- Forced Iowa to 6 straight punts while holding a narrow lead, before, yes, giving up one broken run for a TD and not getting a stop to get a hail mary chance
- Forced IU to an interception and punt in 2 of their last 4 drives in regulation to save a tie, and then forced a FG in OT.
- Forced MN to 4 straight punts while up 1. Then, after conceding a short field TD, forced them to a punt following our INT that got us the ball back with time to win. Then the 4-and-out to seal the W.
- The Wisconsin game I'll agree totally - we had a lead but gave up scores on the final 3 drives (and they were all long drives)
- Maryland's final 3 drives were 2 punts and a FG, keeping them from taking the lead
- Even in the Nebraska game - our D held them to 3 points in the second half, including a missed FG (with a super short field), 2 fumble recoveries and an INT. The offense didn't do anything with it, but the D kept us alive.
So sure, if your standard for "close out games" is "allow zero points in the 4th quarter" then yes, we don't always achieve that. But teams are gonna score in the 4th quarter - that's football. And with the exception of Wisconsin in the last 6 games, the D has gotten quite a few stops that kept us alive in every game.