Pregame: Illinois vs Oakland, Wednesday, November 13th, 8:00pm CT, BTN

Status
Not open for further replies.
#83      
So he’s due for a 10-15 night. Perfect.
Angry Season 2 GIF by The Office
 
#93      
We might hang 130 on em with a good shooting night… no joke.
IMO one of the weaknesses of last year's team was a lack of true, great three point shooters. Outside of 3-4 guys - TSJ, Marcus, Coleman, Goode - you could kind of sag on the others.

This team seemingly has virtually no one you can sag on.

So yeah... they'll likely play a ton of zone and if you can limit TOs, get the ball to the right spots, shoot and make good open shots...

Awesome Very Good GIF by CBS
 
#96      
IMO one of the weaknesses of last year's team was a lack of true, great three point shooters. Outside of 3-4 guys - TSJ, Marcus, Coleman, Goode - you could kind of sag on the others.

This team seemingly has virtually no one you can sag on.

So yeah... they'll likely play a ton of zone and if you can limit TOs, get the ball to the right spots, shoot and make good open shots...

Awesome Very Good GIF by CBS
I hope there's emphasis on getting good looks for Humrichous, I hope Booth keeps shooting 3s and I hope Riley gets so hot that his only miss is a heat check from the logo. Let's go!
 
#98      
I agree with this. There are a couple of guys that are going to get taken advantage of on the defensive end, most notably Riley. He's getting pushed around a little bit, especially on the glass, which shouldn't be a surprise given his age and current frame(insert Adam).

That side of the floor is going to be a work in program and the main source of BU's frustration. I heard him a few times with a "get on the floor!" and a "box out!".....followed by a substitution.
He's still averaging 7 rebs. per game in 24 minutes. Very small sample size but that's better than anyone on our team averaged over last season.
 
#99      
Oakland lost at Boise State by 40 something and Illini are currently -24 for those who care about such things.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back