Pregame: Illinois vs Rutgers, Saturday, February 11th, 1:00pm CT, FS1

Status
Not open for further replies.
#127      

Illini2010-11

Sugar Grove
I think it was Illini, but I don't give a damn. A young kid who is becoming a fan can't see. I figured 0440 would
respond. But maybe he should take a young person that says I can't see anything!!!
Call into Bernstein and Holmes on the Score. You will probably get more sympathy there than on this board. They will likely say the tradition of standing until the opponent scores is stupid, while transitioning into a rant about the Orange Krush.
 
#129      

GallopingGhost

Denver, CO
We were favored by -2.5 earlier in the day now up to-4.5… there a “Vegas knows something” going on or just a bunch of public bettors driving up the price?

I don’t see this being more than a 5 pt game either way.
 
#130      

Illini2010-11

Sugar Grove
We were favored by -2.5 earlier in the day now up to-4.5… there a “Vegas knows something” going on or just a bunch of public bettors driving up the price?

I don’t see this being more than a 5 pt game either way.
Definitely the latter. Now that the game is getting nearer (and showing up on the big boards in the sport books), there is more money flowing into the game, and -2.5 looks very appealing for many betters. I would agree with your thoughts on the game score, so I would think that the line will settle around -4.5 or possibly fall to -3.5 Illini as tipoff approaches. If there is a more drastic move in the lines, then it would likely be more newly discovered/released injury news; but for now, this appears to be the typical spread movement due to volume of money coming in on Illini to cover spread.
 
#131      
A reply to 2nd pl.1st loser. Took my 10 yr. old grandson to a game last year. Unfortunately fans in front of us thought by standing for over 3 minutes in game time till Illini scored helped the team. But a young fan can't see a damn thing. All for fan support, but your really NOT playing. Have some respect for others, especially the new Illinois fans to come!
Is this Dan Bernstein?
 
#133      
Just a random thought. There have been some discussion of how bad RJ is shooting this year compared to his teammates and as had been expected of him. Right now he is about 1 big game (7-7) away from 30% on the season. The difference between RJ and some of the others is that he just hasn't had the 2 or 3 big games to boost his average. Hope he gets his first one of several tomorrow. Would really like to see RJ and Goode go off against Rutgers.
 
#134      
Just a random thought. There have been some discussion of how bad RJ is shooting this year compared to his teammates and as had been expected of him. Right now he is about 1 big game (7-7) away from 30% on the season. The difference between RJ and some of the others is that he just hasn't had the 2 or 3 big games to boost his average. Hope he gets his first one of several tomorrow. Would really like to see RJ and Goode go off against Rutgers.
I can't find the stats for the NCAA, but there have only been 25 NBA players ever to make 7 or more threes in a game without missing. So, while I love the optimism, I'm not going to hold my breath for this one.

Remember, RJ only made 9 threes all year last year. He should've been allowed to have one more year before having all these expectations heaped upon him. But we can blame that on Murray and Davis.
 
#135      
Call into Bernstein and Holmes on the Score. You will probably get more sympathy there than on this board. They will likely say the tradition of standing until the opponent scores is stupid, while transitioning into a rant about the Orange Krush.
Break your radio
 
#136      
Serious ,and the name is not Clark ,Orangeade when you pay for the tickets!!
76BE544A-959A-4E8C-8E8F-EBE8B95E082D.gif
 
#137      
I can't find the stats for the NCAA, but there have only been 25 NBA players ever to make 7 or more threes in a game without missing. So, while I love the optimism, I'm not going to hold my breath for this one.

Remember, RJ only made 9 threes all year last year. He should've been allowed to have one more year before having all these expectations heaped upon him. But we can blame that on Murray and Davis.
Terrance made 8 in one game this year. Plummer made 8 in one game last year. Coleman made 6 in one game IIRC. Agreed that this is not without missing. So yeah, 7 for 7 is an extreme example, but I am not saying RJ needs to go 7 for 7. Just trying to illustrate that he is a couple of exceptional games away from an acceptable 3pt percentage. If he shoots his next 15 3s as well as he shot his 15 last year, he will be just shy of 30% on the season (29.7%).
 
#138      
I might be overly optimistic, but i’ll take the fresh legged Illini at home 71-60. Not a blow out, but not really close.
 
#139      
Agreed. I don't see us doing well in postseason play without solving this problem.

Any thoughts on how we solve the problem?

What say ye all?
Perrin could help, but I have no idea what the odds are that he does. I know he is very tall. He might be our lottery ticket.
If he could give us 7-8 minutes of solid defense & rebounding, it would be huge.
Goode is also coming back. He won’t dominate down low, but he will be able to lengthen our rotation & help keep everyone fresh. Might allow us to use more full court pressure defense too.
 
#145      

pruman91

Paducah, Ky

Erik Hall
The Rutgers and Illinois Fighting Illini men's basketball teams are scheduled to meet in a Big Ten Conference contest on Saturday, Feb. 11 in Champaign, Illinois.
Illinois comes into the matchup 16-7 overall and 7-5 in the Big Ten. Most recently, Iowa beat Illinois 81-79 on Saturday. Illinois' game vs. Minnesota which was originally scheduled for Tuesday got moved to Feb. 20.

As of 7:49 p.m. CT on Friday, Illinois is a 4.5-point vs. Rutgers, according to FanDuel Sportsbook.

The over/under is 132.5 points.
 
#146      

illini80

Forgottonia
Rutgers is a tough team, but we should be rested and motivated to play with our best energy. Gotta win at home and we will. Just don’t shoot 30 3’s and we will be fine.
basketball miss GIF
 
#147      

pruman91

Paducah, Ky
christopherwalken10_MobileImageSizeReigNN.jpg


I'm expecting a rockfight deluxe today , with a lot of physical play and smothering defense played by both sides........

I hope we have our shooting shoes on today and i am excited to see luke get about 5-8 minutes of play and hit a big 3 sometime during the game ........

here's hoping for a score of...........................

Illini 68
mcbrewsters 64

GO ILLINI !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
#149      
100% (well maybe 90%). We have ample time to prepare, we will be rested, Luke will get to play a few minutes, our defense should be able to control them, and although we often don't look as good at home as we should, I think the home court advantage gets us there.
It's funny but I just have a feeling that getting Luke back will help RJ out of his slump for some reason. Maybe it is just wishful thinking.
Earlier in the season I posted that I thought Luke would help everybody. His defender has to stretch to him, so now you’re effectively playing 4 on 4. Potentially wider driving lanes, changing help angles and longer closeouts based on where Luke is, might buy our guys the extra fraction of the second they need to not have to rush their shot. With Mayer and Luke out there, you have 2 you can’t really help off of, and then you’re really in a good spot.

I assume an opposing coach might make Luke prove that he’s back and not rusty first. So it could all be for nothing if Luke doesn’t make them pay when he gets his opportunities.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.