Pregame: Illinois vs Toledo, Saturday, September 2nd, 6:30pm CT, BTN

Status
Not open for further replies.
#101      
No surprise when it comes to Altmyer. At some point we need someone other a transfer at QB to raise our ceiling a bit but for now the portal is helping more efficiently allocate QBs across college football and we should keep taking advantage.
Altmyer has 3 years of eligibility and was a much better caliber of recruit than any high school QB we've had lately (other than Isaiah).
 
#102      

altgeld88

Arlington, Virginia
Naming Luke over Paddock isn't a surprise for week 1. He went 13/35 for 94 yards and an INT vs. Toledo last year. He's a mid G5 talent with P5 leadership.

Love to hear Illinois hasn't shifted to Toledo totally yet. They've also gone thru Kansas and PSU already in camp... that's probably not the smartest as Toledo has an FCS opponent and Kansas lumes 6 days after September 2nd... One team has all its marbles in for week 1.
Totally on board with you. Our offensive strategery regarding our first three opponents is utter lumacy.

Barry Lumacy, Jr., in fact.
 
#103      
This game will likely come down to how well we're able to run the ball and how well we're able to cover within 5-15yds of the line of scrimmage. With a new QB and Center and it being the first game of the season against a solid midmajor, some confusion and missed assignments can probably be expected, and same goes for some turnovers. But if we're getting 4-5yds a carry each time we run it, that'll alleviate a lot of pressure and we'll eventually wear them down. On defense, our line is an absolute beast, so the best way to deal with that is trying to get us to overpursue with screens, designed qb runs, and quick hitters and hot routes. If we can stay at home, jam in man, not miss assignments, and tackle, we should be okay.

That said, if Toledo sells out to stop the run and Luke can't take advantage of it in his first game playing for us, we'll struggle moving the football. As well, if our DBs are getting beat off the line of scrimmage or missing assignments leading to chunk plays off of quick slants and bubble screens, it could be some trouble there as well.

Overall, should be a good test for us. I do see us struggling in our first game, especially on offense, but defense stays strong and we get the job done in a grinder. Put me down for:

Illinois: 20
Toledo: 16
 
#104      
This game will be extra special for me, personally - my first live Illini football game since @UNC in 2015 (rough day, that was...), and my first Illini game at Memorial Stadium this century! 😮 (I did catch a Bears game there during the Soldier Field renovation season)

I'm obviously very excited, but I expect this one to be closer than I think any of us would like. I'd certainly love to be proven wrong, though!

Huge opportunity to start this season off on solid footing and set the tone for the bigger matchups to follow the next two weeks.

I'll predict a 27-21 win.

I-L-L!
 
#105      
Toledo has at least 1, with 2 starters back who missed all of last season and P5 linemen from Miss St, and FSU ready to contribute. Development is as good as many P5 schools ad Toledo. In the trenches Illinois will win the battle. DBs, QB, LB, and TEs will be notches for Toledo. Especially considering Discher hasn't had a great room in Champaign yet. WR will be close. RBs is probably you, but there is a lot of returning carries in our room. A depleted OL led to less from them in 2022.
Finish this statement for me: “Football games are won in the …”
 
#106      
Fun exercise. Basing this off of 2022 stats and best info I can find on returnees.


QB: Tough to compare metrics at QB but we'll assume Finn > Altmyer because of the experience and Finn's success last year. Altmyer had moments as a true freshman against a really good Baylor defense (also some not-so-good moments) and push the QB battle into the season last year against one of the top-15 QBs last season, but those are just anecdotal evidence. The positives for Illinois is that Finn struggled (a) against the best team last year, (b) struggled in games where he faced the most pressure (SDSU, OSU, Buffalo), and he finished poorly (52% completion rate, 4-7 TD-to-INT ratio in final three games). Did he simply run out of gas or did teams figure out a scheme that gave him fits?

RB: Toledo has some RBs that had success running last year (Stuart + Kelly) but both guys are really small, around 5'9 and under 200lb. Not sure that either are great options against P5 defenses but have had success in MAC. Finn can and will run. If anything, it's likely a good exercise to face Finn in week 1 and Daniels in week 2. Illinois has the combo of Love, who proved to be a good #2 last year, and McCray, who was excellent as a freshmen before injuries last year. Love + McCray > Stuart + Kelly

WR: Not going deep on this one. Newton's little brother is good, assuming he's first-team all-MAC in pre-season. Maddox is a little on the shorter side but has a lot of Casey Washington to his game. #2 WR left for Memphis and #4 WR left for Fresno State. After Newton and Maddox, there are maybe 10 career catches combined. Toledo has 19(!) WRs listed on their roster. Let's assume Newton's brother and IW are equals, then it's Maddox v. Washington/Bryant/Elzy/Beatty for players who have caught balls in meaningful moments. Illinois WRs >> Toledo WRs.

TE: Toledo lost their top TE (Turner) and their top returning TE has 10 career catches. PFF says Toledo's TEs cannot block. Griffin Moore played sparingly last year, is definitely known for his hands instead of blocking, and he would be the best blocking TE on Toledo right now. Maybe Toledo doesn't ask their TEs to block? Illinois has Reiman and lots of unknown, but Reiman still has more catches than all of Toledo's TEs combined and he's a solid run blocker. Not close, Illinois TEs >> Toledo TEs.

OL: I mentioned this position before. Toledo didn't have a good offensive line last year and, while they brought in some interesting pieces, those guys are unknowns. Illinois really only has a question mark at center and they should still be one of the better units in the conference (this would be a certainty if Avery Jones stuck with Illinois. Again, not close: Illinois OL >>> Toledo OL.

DL: If I have to explain to you the difference here, then you need to do some research on your own. Illinois DL >>>>> Toledo DL.

LB: Dallas Gant is awesome for Toledo. He isn't a pass rusher but he's extremelyl sound. After Gant is more question marks. Their second best LB is in NFL. Sawiaha Ellis flashed but only played four games. All other LBs who played last year scored poorly on PFF. For Illinois, Tarique Barnes is also excellent and has a decent chance at a senior year All-B1G campaign. Rosiek and Odeluga both put up solid PFF scores and played 10+ games. Even if you believe Gant is better than Barness, Rosiek and Odeluga are way more proven than any other Toledo LB. Illinois LBs >> Toledo LBs.

Secondary: Quinyon Mitchell is awesome, better than any Illinois cornerback (shocked this guy didn't go pro). Very solid safety duo in Nate Bauer (was second team all-MAC last year) and Zach Ford (probably should have been all-MAC). Taevon Nicholson is probably the 3rd or 4th best returning CB in B1G and should be a draft pick or UDFA after this season. Matt Bailey was extremely dynamic as a freshman, but isn't playing. The rest is anecdotal. Toledo secondary >> Illinois secondary.


Additional note - I have no idea what you mean about Discher in your comment.
Completion percentage for Finn was partially because of a new unbalanced and inexperienced OL, and being chased around, and because he was hurt most of the season... Shoulder, Ribs, Ankle... He didn't play in half of the SDSU game, got speared at the 10 yard line to end the UB game, missed EMU, BGSU, and played one drive vs. WMU. He wasn't 100% vs. OSU at all and still ran out of the pocket to throw 2 bombs down the field. One to Zsiros who is a 6'4 threat you forgot to mention at WR.

I literally believe Finn would start for every single B1G team but two considering the B1G has like 3 returning starters total. He's a 5th year junior with a lot to prove. The offense may look pretty different than 2022.

Kuhl and Torres are bigger threats pass catching in their young stages than Illinois' TEs. You'll have to wait and see on that one. TE room always produces here, and we have put 2 of our last TEs in the NFL to show for it. Your podcast put the O/u at 400 yards and 4.5 TDs for the whole room this season... blocking is great, but if they're not a threat to score or be used in the red zone, I like our style with the TEs more.
 
#110      

mhuml32

Cincinnati, OH
Completion percentage for Finn was partially because of a new unbalanced and inexperienced OL, and being chased around, and because he was hurt most of the season... Shoulder, Ribs, Ankle... He didn't play in half of the SDSU game, got speared at the 10 yard line to end the UB game, missed EMU, BGSU, and played one drive vs. WMU. He wasn't 100% vs. OSU at all and still ran out of the pocket to throw 2 bombs down the field. One to Zsiros who is a 6'4 threat you forgot to mention at WR.

I literally believe Finn would start for every single B1G team but two considering the B1G has like 3 returning starters total. He's a 5th year junior with a lot to prove. The offense may look pretty different than 2022.

Kuhl and Torres are bigger threats pass catching in their young stages than Illinois' TEs. You'll have to wait and see on that one. TE room always produces here, and we have put 2 of our last TEs in the NFL to show for it. Your podcast put the O/u at 400 yards and 4.5 TDs for the whole room this season... blocking is great, but if they're not a threat to score or be used in the red zone, I like our style with the TEs more.


But this is a schematic argument, not a talent argument. If you want to argue schemes - The Illinois secondary just put four guys in the NFL last year with three of them picked in the first three rounds. Toledo can't compete with that.
 
#111      
Not sure how many additional tickets we can realistically sell in ten days, but this is what ticket sales are looking like just from eyeballing it:

West Main: Probably packed ... vast majority of tickets sold.
West Balcony: Mostly full ... "low" availability. Side note, this section seems like a steal! Amazing seats for only $25?!
East Main: Mostly full ... "low" availability in most sections and singles in some. Which means the visible seats will be mostly full.
East Balcony: Pretty empty? Although maybe the fact that the top rows are even available on the website means we are doing decently well with sales.
Horseshoe: Looking about 60% full right now, but I swear that section is full even during our crowds of 35k, lol ... so a little hope there?

I know my obsession with attendance is a bit old and it simply takes time to build up the fan base again, but what Bret has accomplished so far here is nothing short of amazing, and I am not sure the attendance uptick reflects that yet. Again, these things tend to lag, but I wish we'd put a few more fans in the stands. If we can beat Toledo and then take our chances with KU, we should have a great crowd for PSU, though.

Beat Toledo!
 
#112      

mhuml32

Cincinnati, OH
Not sure how many additional tickets we can realistically sell in ten days, but this is what ticket sales are looking like just from eyeballing it:

West Main: Probably packed ... vast majority of tickets sold.
West Balcony: Mostly full ... "low" availability. Side note, this section seems like a steal! Amazing seats for only $25?!
East Main: Mostly full ... "low" availability in most sections and singles in some. Which means the visible seats will be mostly full.
East Balcony: Pretty empty? Although maybe the fact that the top rows are even available on the website means we are doing decently well with sales.
Horseshoe: Looking about 60% full right now, but I swear that section is full even during our crowds of 35k, lol ... so a little hope there?

I know my obsession with attendance is a bit old and it simply takes time to build up the fan base again, but what Bret has accomplished so far here is nothing short of amazing, and I am not sure the attendance uptick reflects that yet. Again, these things tend to lag, but I wish we'd put a few more fans in the stands. If we can beat Toledo and then take our chances with KU, we should have a great crowd for PSU, though.

Beat Toledo!

It’s not old. I like these updates.
 
#114      
Finish this statement for me: “Football games are won in the …

giphy.gif
 
#115      
But this is a schematic argument, not a talent argument. If you want to argue schemes - The Illinois secondary just put four guys in the NFL last year with three of them picked in the first three rounds. Toledo can't compete with that.
And I'd bet the scheme and place to succeed at Illinois with current staff and players at DB will definitely surpass Toledo at some point this season or next. But game one with a new DC, and replacing safety (not to mention an injury to a veteran), and CB yall will be at a disadvantage September 2nd at that spot. Toledo has put dbs in the league as well. Tycen Anderson had 2 INTs with a pick 6 for the Bengals in week 1 of the preseason. Barry Church went to Toledo. But this is week 1 of a probable high year for Toledo, vs. week 1 of a probable decent season for the Illini.

For WMU in 2016, they lost by a TD in the cotton bowl to the 2nd place Wisconsin badgers. Good MAC teams in schedule spots (I believe this is), CAN and DO compete regularly with the bigten middle squads. 14 seasons in a row a MAC team has beaten a B1G team. My money would be on Akron over Indiana, or EMU over Minnesota before this one... but according to KFord this is the only MAC game of the season in the top 20 in the nation of competitiveness AND talent. Ranks #11 of week 1 CFB. Toledo will likely end with a top 50 offense and top 35 defense in 2023. UT was 73rd and 25th last season. How many teams is that better than on your schedule? 4, 5, 6? All in all I expect between a 3 and 14 pt win for Illinois. But the chance of an upset is higher than a 3 TD win in my opinion. It's why outlets are picking this upset galore. Its trenches vs. a high level QB and a squad who isn't dominated in any other facets talent wise.
 
#116      
Not sure how many additional tickets we can realistically sell in ten days, but this is what ticket sales are looking like just from eyeballing it:

West Main: Probably packed ... vast majority of tickets sold.
West Balcony: Mostly full ... "low" availability. Side note, this section seems like a steal! Amazing seats for only $25?!
East Main: Mostly full ... "low" availability in most sections and singles in some. Which means the visible seats will be mostly full.
East Balcony: Pretty empty? Although maybe the fact that the top rows are even available on the website means we are doing decently well with sales.
Horseshoe: Looking about 60% full right now, but I swear that section is full even during our crowds of 35k, lol ... so a little hope there?

I know my obsession with attendance is a bit old and it simply takes time to build up the fan base again, but what Bret has accomplished so far here is nothing short of amazing, and I am not sure the attendance uptick reflects that yet. Again, these things tend to lag, but I wish we'd put a few more fans in the stands. If we can beat Toledo and then take our chances with KU, we should have a great crowd for PSU, though.

Beat Toledo!
As a 1st time visitor, how many fans did Wyoming bring. And are sections 110 and 109 usually the away fans? Does Wisconsin or Ohio State full up half of the stadium? Did NIU or any other local MAC teams bring fans when you last played?
 
#117      
This feels like a game where poor special teams could sink us. It's weird that they had Griffin practicing punting, guessing coaches don't have lots of confidence in Robertson
If this game is close enough where poor special teams could sink us(unless it's a blocked punt for a TD or a kick return for a TD)....it's going to be a loooong year. Toledo, while not a total rummy, should be a three TD win. We have a significant leak somewhere if that's not the case.
 
Last edited:
#118      
Not sure how many additional tickets we can realistically sell in ten days, but this is what ticket sales are looking like just from eyeballing it:

West Main: Probably packed ... vast majority of tickets sold.
West Balcony: Mostly full ... "low" availability. Side note, this section seems like a steal! Amazing seats for only $25?!
East Main: Mostly full ... "low" availability in most sections and singles in some. Which means the visible seats will be mostly full.
East Balcony: Pretty empty? Although maybe the fact that the top rows are even available on the website means we are doing decently well with sales.
Horseshoe: Looking about 60% full right now, but I swear that section is full even during our crowds of 35k, lol ... so a little hope there?

I know my obsession with attendance is a bit old and it simply takes time to build up the fan base again, but what Bret has accomplished so far here is nothing short of amazing, and I am not sure the attendance uptick reflects that yet. Again, these things tend to lag, but I wish we'd put a few more fans in the stands. If we can beat Toledo and then take our chances with KU, we should have a great crowd for PSU, though.

Beat Toledo!
Guessing that Labor Day weekend might lighten the student attendance? We still need to prove that we can win consistently, it is Toledo and it is a holiday weekend.
 
#119      
Good Guys - 31
Bad Guys - 14

I HAVE to think that our defensive front is going to stuff the run and get enough pressure that a young(unproven) secondary should get some significant help with limiting blown coverages.

We should control the LOS on both sides. If not, I'll have a considerable amount of concerns moving forward. This is a game that we should win, fairly comfortably, but not in blowout fashion.
 
#120      
Good Guys - 31
Bad Guys - 14

I HAVE to think that our defensive front is going to stuff the run and get enough pressure that a young(unproven) secondary should get some significant help with limiting blown coverages.

We should control the LOS on both sides. If not, I'll have a considerable amount of concerns moving forward. This is a game that we should win, fairly comfortably, but not in blowout fashion.
You just said it should be a 3 touchdown win 2 posts before this….then predicted a 17 point win….
 
#121      
Illini D gets 4 sacks and forces 2 turnovers. Offense sputters a bit but gets job done. 26-13 good guys.

Now I just need to figure out how many confidence points to give game because I have a feeling this will be one of the games in our pool.
 
#122      
Our DL will set the tone and flex on Toledo, especially in the 2nd half after Toledo is worn down. Finn is going to get up close and personal with Newton / Randolph / Jacas, all high-level NFL draft picks on our starting DL.

If Toledo can't come out quickly and put points up in the 1st half, the game will be over by the end of the 3rd quarter at the latest. Illinois is going to score on Toledo, I don't think Toledo is going to be able to score (enough) on Illinois. 31 - 13 good guys.
 
#123      
And I'd bet the scheme and place to succeed at Illinois with current staff and players at DB will definitely surpass Toledo at some point this season or next. But game one with a new DC, and replacing safety (not to mention an injury to a veteran), and CB yall will be at a disadvantage September 2nd at that spot.
Same can be said about every team about unproven players and depth

Didn't Toledo lose their top 3 sack leaders from last season? Unless I am missing something Toledo looks very young and raw on the DL. That is something Illinois will look to exploit and control the line of scrimmage.

Illinois will be replacing a number of quality players in the secondary. They have also done that for a few years now. Illinois DL is very strong and while Toledo would love to exploit the secondary, will they have enough time consistently to do that? Toledo needs to run the ball effectively and take the Illinois DL out of the equation by getting the ball out quickly on passing downs.

I think this game being week 1 gives Toledo an advantage compared to later in the season. That being said I think the Illinois D is hands down better than Toledo D and Illinois might surprise offensively. This is the strongest and most depth at WR I remember Illinois having in a very long time. BB will gameplan for holes in the Toledo D and I look for them to get exploited.
 
#125      
Not sure how many additional tickets we can realistically sell in ten days, but this is what ticket sales are looking like just from eyeballing it:

West Main: Probably packed ... vast majority of tickets sold.
West Balcony: Mostly full ... "low" availability. Side note, this section seems like a steal! Amazing seats for only $25?!
East Main: Mostly full ... "low" availability in most sections and singles in some. Which means the visible seats will be mostly full.
East Balcony: Pretty empty? Although maybe the fact that the top rows are even available on the website means we are doing decently well with sales.
Horseshoe: Looking about 60% full right now, but I swear that section is full even during our crowds of 35k, lol ... so a little hope there?

I know my obsession with attendance is a bit old and it simply takes time to build up the fan base again, but what Bret has accomplished so far here is nothing short of amazing, and I am not sure the attendance uptick reflects that yet. Again, these things tend to lag, but I wish we'd put a few more fans in the stands. If we can beat Toledo and then take our chances with KU, we should have a great crowd for PSU, though.

Beat Toledo!
I think we were looking at 45k tickets sold for this game (?). The problem is that 45k in attendance doesn't look good on TV because of how warped our stadium looks from past renovations. I really hope the stadium renovations come sooner rather than later, and that will lead to better attendance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.