We don't know how many of the potential FA on your list will actually become FAs so it is difficult to even comment on them. Those that do will be in demand as my list showed. Add in the teams that are not on the list that need SP, such as St Louis, and the price for the top end talent will be steep. As you pointed out ownership may well not want to sign then especially with the uncertainty of a lockout/strike.
Yes, the price will be steep, but ownership
can afford to do it. Not saying they
will, but they can. If ownership doesn't want to, the question becomes how we'll ever compete. There are no ace pitchers coming out of the system in 2027 or 2028. And probably not in 2029 or 2030 either. Maybe one, if we get lucky with Liam Doyle. Quinn Matthews is our next most promising pitching prospect, and projects as a mid to late rotation guy. We've got a ton of those guys. Which is the point. We have the 3-5 spots and rotation depth locked up for next to nothing. If ever there was a time to spend on bringing in ace pitchers, now is that time.
So if we aren't willing to spend on starting pitching now, then we're probably not willing to spend on starting pitching ever. So what's the plan? Ride out the team control years of our current crop of talent, the Burlesons, Herreras, Winns, and Walkers, selling them off as they enter their last years before free agency, hoping that one day we hit on 3 high end pitching prospects at the same time?
As for the lockout, that's a convenient but non-sensical excuse. While teams are still on the hook for signing bonuses and deferred salaries, they don't pay for base salaries for parts of the season that get cancelled. While no lockout has resulted in fewer games being played, in the 1994 strike the final solution was that players were paid a pro-rated amount based upon actual games played. If anything, this favors signing a big-money player. Let's assume the 2027 season gets shortened to just half the normal amount of games. You could have a shortened season and playoff run with Skubal as your ace pitcher for half his normal salary. Why would that be a bad thing?
As far as a top ten team for salary it's been a while. 2019 and then COVID 2020. I can't imagine them jumping back up there anytime soon. They are not going to spend $100 million on new player contracts little alone $172. With some rounding they are at $95 million. I can see them getting to Milwaukee numbers of $135 but that's it. Hello #17 which will probably be #20 in 2027.
Agree totally with your final comments.
So then we likely won't see a division title (much less WS contention) in the next decade. Which unfortunately I agree is the likely scenario. But it's not what they sold this re-build as. There was talk of this being a quick re-build. Well here we are, in year 1 of the rebuild, and things don't look so bad. We got rid of all long term financial obligations, have the #27 payroll in the league, and due to some strides taken by home-grown talent are on pace to finish right around .500 (currently on pace for an 80-82 season). So what are we waiting for?
Another question this raises is, was the rebuild even necessary? Look at the years Gray and Contreras are having. Add them back in and try to fortify the OF keep Donovan to play 3rd base, get payroll back to 2024 levels, and maybe we'd be in contention this year.