The Illinois Coaching Search

Status
Not open for further replies.
#976      
All these comments about what it's like in Champaign, IL REALLY show that reality takes a while to catch up with perception! Champaign in 2005 is nothin' special. Champaign in 2017 is regularly making top college town lists, has exploded in new commercial growth and is the fastest growing community in the state besides the newer Chicago suburbs.

When I was in school well over a decade ago, Playboy named C-U the top college party town in the country. We would make pretty much every top 5 list. It's always been a big time party town. 18/19 and up bar scene, largest Greek community in the country; whole town built around the university. People outside the university/alumni community don't realize this, though.
 
#978      
There seem to be two prevailing opinions on the Illinois job:

1. That it's a sleeping giant, top 15 job in the country with plenty of resources to be successful at the highest level.
2. That it is overrated and nothing more than a middle-of-the-road P5 job.

IMO the truth is somewhere in the middle.

The opinion on this is going to be generational. I'm sure anybody younger than 25 has their doubts. And if you are younger than 35 you are "somewhere in the middle." If you experienced the phantom travel (Winters, Douglas, Altenberger), flying Illini (Gill, Bardo, Anderson, Battle), Deon Thomas and Brian Cook, and the Manual guys (Serg, Marcus and Frankie), and Dee, Deron and Luther, and so many others, you know that the success can be sustained. An somewhat above average coach that knows how to put together a staff to cover his weakness (Lou and Tony Yates and Jimmy Collins) gets the court named after him. Outstanding coaches like Kruger and Self would have statues if they would have stayed. Honestly, for the right guy, that wants to build a legacy rather than lunch on one, this is the best job in the country.
 
#980      
This is a good post, but I don't think expectations are much of a millstone now. Most would just settle for having to watch the NCAA Selection Show every year. That might change in the future, but that also likely means the coach has been successful

I think there are two very different and equally fair ways to view the job:

Version 1: Illinois is a top-15 all-time program in one of the most talent-rich states in the country. We have been nationally relevant for long stretches in the past (our all-time peer programs are along the lines of Arizona, Syracuse, Michigan State, Maryland, Villanova, Georgetown - the current situation is anomalous). We recruit the St Louis area as well as anyone and have strong regional connections to Ohio, Indiana, and Wisconsin. Chicago is a top-5 media market and St Louis is big enough to generate plenty of visibility. We are a major research university with abundant resources, top-notch athletic facilities, and a vast network of powerful alumni. This is a job where the right coach can become a legend. We were on the cusp of elite status from 1980 to 2007 - constantly on ESPN, perpetually sold out arenas, pulling in top-50 recruits regularly. So there's a precedent.

Version 2: Illinois is a difficult job. Fans have outlandish expectations due to the Henson-Kruger-Self stretch and won't settle for even brief stretches of mediocrity. The brand has eroded to the point where schools like Northwestern, Minnesota, Texas Tech, and Colorado are seen as more reasonable program peers by national observers. The state itself is a financial and administrative disaster, the university is in the rural Midwest (the picture of cultural desolation according to many), the Big Ten is an annual bloodbath with strategically brilliant coaches and brutally physical play, Chicago recruiting is at best difficult to break into and at worst rife with corruption. Maybe 10-15 years ago the Illini brand had enough sex appeal to overcome the cornfields and bitter winters, but not now. While the program's past success represents a sort of proof-of-concept, the expectations now are a millstone.

I don't think that either viewpoint is wrong, per se. I think it's complicated and ultimately a matter of perspective. We all tend toward the former view, while most people around the country likely lean toward the latter (or somewhere in the middle). The right coach will embrace the glass-half-full version and relish the challenge.
 
#981      
giphy.gif

What it means is I would like to have him as a coach or at least have JW kick the tires, but I don't think he is leaving Manhattan regardless.
 
#983      
Wow. There's been some odd mentions on here but this takes the cake.

No- I can't imagine Masiello ever even being considered. However, it sadly isn't the worst suggestion in this thread. We've had posters give the job to AAU coaches, Sergio McClain and Kendall Gill. At least Masiello is a college basketball coach. Not one to consider but at least he's in the profession...:huh:
 
#984      

Illiini

In the land of the Nittany Lion
...cornfields and bitter winters...

Ha, have you been to State College, smack dab in the middle of Pennsyltucky? Winters are at least as bad as Chambana, with the added bonus of lake effect snow from Lake Erie. Oh, the other local industry? A state prison. Road into town has a sign telling you not to pick up hitchhikers.

On the other hand, Pennsyltucky.

But Pennsylvania does love its Nittany Lions like U of I could only wish Illinois did the Illini.
 
#985      

I don't buy that narrative, but I think it's pervasive among national NCAA fans with no attachment to the program. Maybe I'm wrong. Most Big Ten fans and people who pay attention to basketball history would tend toward the former assessment I laid out. Just saying that outside of our community, there are lots of people who think that Illinois is nothing special (outside of its engineering and business programs). I know they're wrong, you know they're wrong. I hope Archie Miller knows they're wrong.
 
#986      
What it means is I would like to have him as a coach or at least have JW kick the tires, but I don't think he is leaving Manhattan regardless.

He wouldn't leave because no one would offer him a job. South Florida (an absolute dumpster fire of a basketball program) rescinded their offer after Masiello was exposed as a total fraud. Now Manhattan sits at the bottom of their conference.

He might be qualified to be the next UIC coach. Not UIUC.
 
#988      

Illiniwek06

N of I-80
Some of the names thrown around will use this as a stepping stone. Id prefer to hire someone who at least has potential not to jump ship after 3 years.

I prefer that a coach use Illinois as a stepping stone as opposed to being fired. The former implies success.


¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
#989      

ILL in IA

Iowa City
Lot of interesting talk on 670 right now. Not names, but what needs to be done with the next coach. The politics they will need to play. I think Goff is on with his thoughts. Anyone else listening?
 
#991      
I prefer that a coach use Illinois as a stepping stone as opposed to being fired. The former implies success.


¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Put me in the camp that thinks Self literally only leaves for KU, which was his dream job. Kruger left for the NBA, a destination that often steals from Blue Bloods, too (not to mention Kruger has been somewhat of a traveler!). This idea that we are a stepping stone, while understandable, is kind of odd. IMO, we're no more of a stepping stone than MSU, Michigan, Ohio State or Georgetown ... there was just a very specific circumstance that led to that perception.
 
#992      
I woke up today and thought "I'm going to be the Kevin Keatts guy". Outstanding man, outstanding recruiter, and has now proven that he can coach. He knows the prep recruiting game as well as anyone in the country and I honestly believe he could be the one to finally unlock Chicago for us. I understand why some think he is a bit risky, but what he has done (w/o big time recruits yet) at UNCW is phenomenal. Any comparison between he and Groce is null and void due to Keatts actually winning his conference (3 times in a row) after walking into a bad situation. I don't think he would be recognized as such immediately, but I think he is a homerun hire
 
#994      
I prefer that a coach use Illinois as a stepping stone as opposed to being fired.

is this an overwhelming majority opinion? Is all this back and forth and speculation all for a potential stepping stone coach that will be gone in 3 years?

Priorities. All in there right places.
 
#995      
"The reason for Keatts’ success is simple, Pitino said.

“He’s got the total package,” Pitino said. “He doesn’t have a weakness as a coach. He’s an outstanding recruiter, that was a big factor in us winning the championship.

“He knows how to scout and prepare. He also communicates with the players well. He has a great rapport with his players. He’s not soft on them but the players love him.”"

Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/college/article136192413.html#storylink=cpy
 
#996      
South Florida (an absolute dumpster fire of a basketball program) rescinded their offer after Masiello was exposed as a total fraud.

To be fair, USF had actually agreed to hire him. And Masiello thinking he'd graduated from Kentucky when he hadn't seemed like a good faith mistake, if a pretty embarrassing one.

He was a nice candidate at the time. It has gone sharply downhill since.
 
#997      

Illiniwek06

N of I-80
is this an overwhelming majority opinion? Is all this back and forth and speculation all for a potential stepping stone coach that will be gone in 3 years?

Priorities. All in there right places.

A coach must first have success in order to use Illinois as a stepping stone. I would argue that it is your perspective which is placing a priority in the wrong place.
 
#998      
To be fair, USF had actually agreed to hire him. And Masiello thinking he'd graduated from Kentucky when he hadn't seemed like a good faith mistake, if a pretty embarrassing one.

He was a nice candidate at the time. It has gone sharply downhill since.

He needs a change of scenery. Wherever that may be, who knows, but I am not writing off his ability to coach and recruit until he crashes and burns at his next spot.
 
#999      

BZuppke

Plainfield
Put me in the camp that thinks Self literally only leaves for KU, which was his dream job. Kruger left for the NBA, a destination that often steals from Blue Bloods, too (not to mention Kruger has been somewhat of a traveler!). This idea that we are a stepping stone, while understandable, is kind of odd. IMO, we're no more of a stepping stone than MSU, Michigan, Ohio State or Georgetown ... there was just a very specific circumstance that led to that perception.

This is the reality. People like to draw generalized conclusions that have little basis in fact. Same can be said for football. Other than Mackovic, who ever left for a better job?
 
#1,000      
I prefer that a coach use Illinois as a stepping stone as opposed to being fired. The former implies success.


¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I think everyone here would be happy if Illinois hired the next Bill Self right now. Illinois needs a spark, the problem was Weber and Groce didn't work out after Self left.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.