The Illinois Coaching Search

Status
Not open for further replies.
#2,651      
Lurker here, but long time fan. Wayyy more of a casual fan than most of you here. But a question.

Chicago recruiting has been difficult to say the least for a long time. It seems to me that won't necessarily change any time soon. It also seems that recruiting is becoming more national and less localized. There are only so many resources a program can throw at recruiting no matter who you are. Some buckets are bigger, but still. So would it make sense to basically just quit worrying about Chicago, since we aren't very successful anyway, and utilize those resources in other areas?

You're always going to target local kids, but

yesjacknicholson.gif
 
#2,652      
Get some wins and the recruits will come. This program can sell itself when it is winning.
 
#2,653      
I'm curious to know how many people on this board are from Chicago. Henson never won because of Xs and Os. He was almost out the door until Jimmy Collins saved him with a pipeline in Chicago. They played hard D and Lou even talked about how he couldn't really control the guys all the time with his schematics.

Self didn't really recruit Chicago at the rate of Henson. Luther Head was his only Chicago recruit and I'll even add Dee Brown since Maywood is still 20 minutes from downtown. He's still a great recruiter but he had to cast a wide net.

The fact of the matter is Chicago kids go to places where they trust the staff and have a natural relationship with them. Wisconsin to a higher degree the past couple of seasons but Chicago kids aren't lining up to play there.

I'm from Chicago and live in Bucktown. High caliber Chicago kids go where they can win and get exposure. My sense, in being around the basketball scene here, is that many, many people would like that to be Illinois, but those kids will continue to go to Kentucky, Kansas and Duke until we get our !!!! together. I think we need an Xs and Os coach that wins consistently for 4-5 years and then we will see that many do value the state school when we have something to offer them
 
#2,654      

Mike

C-U Townie
Board consensus, March 14 - "Cuonzo just doesn't do it for me - didn't we just have a guy who could recruit but couldn't get results out of the what he reeled in?"

*Mizzou hires Cuonzo March 15*

Board consensus, March 16 - "I just don't know about Gregg Marshall or Tony Bennett. Can those guys recruit Chicago?"

You always want what you don't have.

I just wish there was a way to have several coaches at once.
 
#2,656      
I don't think the heir apparent at UNC is someone who is 54 years old like Marshall.

I was kind of thrown by that one too. If people are concerned about GM's personality being too abrasive for Illinois he sure as sh*t not going to fit in Chapel Hill.
 
#2,657      
Speaking as someone who grew up in Virginia, UVA has a rep of being a very elitist school. Couldn't tell you exactly why, but whenever I had to interact with groups from UVA, there is always an added tinge of arrogance. TIFWIW

The U of I campus is not exactly considered to be "humble" by our friends at NIU, ISU, SIU etc either.

Well, except when talking about the attractiveness of women on our respective campuses....
 
#2,658      

ILL in IA

Iowa City
GMAB.... Seriously? Well, to answer your question honestly, I don't. It's called an opinion. After his psychotic meltdown this summer in Canada, I saw all I need to. He is flipping nuts and for a fan base as obsessed as we are about recruiting, you'd think more would be concerned about his behavior and personal characteristics. At least publicly.
F3G8ymQkOkbII.gif
 
#2,659      
Ramey is already committed to Louisville.

There is no doubt that Martin can recruit, and I wish he had stayed at Cal. However, he has had great talent before and not done much with it.

He had great talent one year. If he has sustainable great talent he may just stumble across a lot of wins. There's no reason to project that his third place finish in conference with his most talented team is how he will perform every year with a talented team. Even Calipari and Izzo have done less with more. Cuonzo is in a really good spot.
 
#2,661      
ps where is all this extra money coming from? how can we suddenly afford to pay top 10-20 salaries if the rumors are true

And it's not "sudden." It was there during our last search, but you don't give that type of money to a guy coming from Ohio University with only mild success.
 
#2,662      
Lurker here, but long time fan. Wayyy more of a casual fan than most of you here. But a question.

Chicago recruiting has been difficult to say the least for a long time. It seems to me that won't necessarily change any time soon. It also seems that recruiting is becoming more national and less localized. There are only so many resources a program can throw at recruiting no matter who you are. Some buckets are bigger, but still. So would it make sense to basically just quit worrying about Chicago, since we aren't very successful anyway, and utilize those resources in other areas?

It's not a bad idea. I think our previous staffs have put too much effort in kids that were never coming here. We really need a staff that can identify the truly interested players. We need to use our resources more efficiently, but we definitely need some players from Chicago.
 
#2,663      
The way I see it, Illini are going to try hard for Bennett or Marshall (I think Marshall is more likely to leave of the two) and if not they are bringing in Bryce Drew who will bring Roger Powell with him.

Although I am a fan of Keats, I don't think he is enough of a splash. I think Whitman knows he needs to hit a home run. I've been a huge fan of him and wouldn't be surprised when he comes up with an out of the box hire.
 
#2,665      
The Bennett rumors remind me of the Kevin Sumlin rumors. Might just be leveraging an offer to get more money at UVA. No inside knowledge, just incapable of optimism at this point..:eek:

I'd think a lot of coaches agents will be trying to leverage the Illinois job to get higher offers---I bet Cuonzo already did.
 
#2,666      
The way I see it, Illini are going to try hard for Bennett or Marshall (I think Marshall is more likely to leave of the two) and if not they are bringing in Bryce Drew who will bring Roger Powell with him.

Although I am a fan of Keats, I don't think he is enough of a splash. I think Whitman knows he needs to hit a home run. I've been a huge fan of him and wouldn't be surprised when he comes up with an out of the box hire.







Good post do we know Drew's buyout at Vandy as I guess Bennett's is 3 million or so? I agree Marshall is more likely to leave then Bennett I think he is happy at UVA and has a good thing there.
 
#2,667      
Just so everyone's clear on where you stand can you handicap the following as the next Illinois coach.

Bennett:
Miller:
Marshall:
The Field:

Bennett 0%
Miller 1%
Marshall 2%
The Field 97%

I just have an inkling it might be Steve Prohm, and when you people treat that as not a grand slam, I might just have an aneurysm and die and you won't have to listen to my nonsense any more. So, root for that I guess :D
 
#2,668      
Chicago recruiting has been difficult to say the least for a long time. It seems to me that won't necessarily change any time soon. It also seems that recruiting is becoming more national and less localized. There are only so many resources a program can throw at recruiting no matter who you are. Some buckets are bigger, but still. So would it make sense to basically just quit worrying about Chicago, since we aren't very successful anyway, and utilize those resources in other areas?

Top recruits are national recruits. But people are kidding themselves if they think we will not get top recruits from Chicago or Illinois but will get them consistently from somewhere else. The proximity/state advantage is indeed a benefit, although a slight one.

I like all the tough talk that people over the years bring on message boards. We do not need Chicago, we do not need CPL, we do not need this powerful AAU program, we do not need the other powerful program, let's teach them a lesson... Some lesson we have taught them, I do not see the Mac Irvin Fire's of the world struggling or shedding any tears, yet we have become irrelevant in college basketball.

To be successful at Illinois, a coach needs to be a dynamic recruiter. He does not only need to deal with the powerful HS and AAU programs, he will need to embrace them.
 
#2,669      

illinipioneer

Richmond, VA
The U of I campus is not exactly considered to be "humble" by our friends at NIU, ISU, SIU etc either.

Well, except when talking about the attractiveness of women on our respective campuses....

I mean in reality UI and UVA are really quite similar, growing up I would use UVA as a comparable example to explain how UI is viewed academically.
 
#2,670      

Mike

C-U Townie
Just so everyone's clear on where you stand can you handicap the following as the next Illinois coach.

Bennett:
Miller:
Marshall:
The Field:

I want to know what Whitman says about the odds. ;)
 
#2,673      
I'm curious to know how many people on this board are from Chicago. Henson never won because of Xs and Os. He was almost out the door until Jimmy Collins saved him with a pipeline in Chicago. They played hard D and Lou even talked about how he couldn't really control the guys all the time with his schematics.

Self didn't really recruit Chicago at the rate of Henson. Luther Head was his only Chicago recruit and I'll even add Dee Brown since Maywood is still 20 minutes from downtown. He's still a great recruiter but he had to cast a wide net.

The fact of the matter is Chicago kids go to places where they trust the staff and have a natural relationship with them. Wisconsin to a higher degree the past couple of seasons but Chicago kids aren't lining up to play there.

Lou was never on his way out the door, and his first great talent came before Jimmy Collins was ever on staff. Tony Yates was the lead recruiter for Levi Cobb, Eddie Johnson, Efrem Winters, Ken (Colliers) Norman and other Chicago area kids. Henson's 1982 recruiting class had two McDonald's All Americans in it (Winters and Bruce Douglas) plus the third best player after them in Illinois (Doug Altenberger).

The breakthrough in Chicago came five years earlier with Levi Cobb out of Morgan Park. The next year Illinois got Eddie Johnson from Westinghouse plus Mark Smith from Peoria.

Henson and Illinois were on the rise after the 1978-79 season and it continued through the 80s.

All of this happened before Jimmy Collins arrived in 1983. Collins was great, no doubt, but Tony Yates was the assistant who got the ball rolling in Chicago. By the time Collins arrived, Henson was entrenched at Illinois and the team was really good. 1984 season was 26-5 and Elite Eight with Henson and Yates recruits. Collins was instrumental in getting the Chicago kids in the mid-80s going forward (Nick Anderson, Lowell Hamilton, Kiwane Garris, Deon Thomas, etc.).
 
#2,674      
Bennett 0%
Miller 1%
Marshall 2%
The Field 97%

I just have an inkling it might be Steve Prohm, and when you people treat that as not a grand slam, I might just have an aneurysm and die and you won't have to listen to my nonsense any more. So, root for that I guess :D





Would we rather have Prohm or Keatts if we miss on those top other guys? I'd rather have Keatts I think he has a higher ceiling but Prohm maybe a higher floor?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.