Tbf she says the alleged incident lasted like 30 seconds…with about 10 seconds being the violating part
Right, in my opinion, DA Jennifer Tatum overcharged Shannon with rape (which carries a 12- to 54-year prison term in the state of Kansas). But, on the other hand, she listed the alterative charge of sexual battery, which carries no prison term and a $2,500 fine. So, in my opinion, that sexual battery charge may lead to a conviction in court, if it goes that far, or a plea deal, if it doesn't, which is what I would guess.
Based just on this probable cause affidavit, in my opinion, this is a suspension-worthy allegation of what AD Josh Witman calls the DIA's zero-tolerance policy on sexual misconduct, especially what the 2023-2024 handbook identifies as type 4 (of 7) among the so-called major offenses and generally categories as "sexual misconduct". Yeah, too bad it seems the DIA didn't educate enough on this policy to steer all U of I athletes clear of any allegations of this type of conduct, which the policy clearly states could lead to suspension and, as we know, criminal charges in the state of Kansas. It appears some athletes might need more time on basic conduct rules, so they don't jeopardize their careers and the university's reputation. Personally, I'm behind AD Whitman's zero tolerance of sexual misconduct 100%. I'm glad the panel upheld the suspension. I'm disappointed that Shannon and Sutter think they can fight it. And I hope and expect that they can't win in the end, since, in my opinion, this means we and University lose. But we will see. As I say, these are just my personal opinions.