USC, UCLA to join the Big Ten in 2024

Status
Not open for further replies.
#53      
I'd be willing to bet that someone at the league office has run that math and has a pretty good idea about what sort of increased revenues to expect by adding certain schools.
Obviously. And that's why I don't see the conference adding more than USC/UCLA at this time. The question was directed at everyone trying to bring in half of the PAC 12.
 
#54      
I don't necessarily like that we're moving to two mega conferences, but I am at least happy the Big 10 is one of those two conferences.

What would be great is if the Big Ten can crush the SEC and what remains of the rest of the major conferences, expand into all the P5/P6 schools, and divide them up into subgroups. Let's call them "leagues" for lack of a better word. And each "league" can be more or less geographical and incorporate traditional rivalries and play a league championship at the end of the season, after which there can be some kind of national post-season where the best team from each league can compete for the overall Big Ten/national championship. That would be cool.
 
#55      

Bigtex

DFW
If the B1G does end up pulling from the Pac-12, I wonder if they'll go after Oregon and Washington too. They'd fit in terms of academics, athletics, and desirable markets (Seattle and Portland).
I would think Oregon and Arizona would be next two best options. Then Stanford, Washington and Colorado.
 
#57      
For the sake of the students, I hope this does not go through. Adding the east coast schools introduced 2.5 hour flights. Flying to LA is 4.5-5 hours. For the LA schools, it is even worse, they lose 2-3 hours on time zones on the way to the game. You are effectively giving up a day before each game and most of day upon return.
It’s all about getting the B1G network running on the West Coast. I gotta believe most student athletes take the bulk of their classes online these days…
 
#58      
There’s (1) “Big Ten” the athletic conference, and (2) “Big Ten” the broader cultural reference point. When you tell someone you come from a Big Ten school, that’s going to frame certain perceptions about you to many people, particularly in the workplace. I’m not sure what affect adding UCLA and USC (and potentially Stanford and Cal and Oregon and Washington) has on the former, but it certainly isn’t going to hurt the cachet of the latter. Our degrees are maybe gaining a couple of pounds.
 
#61      

217sports

Springfield
UNC ND Oregon Stanford would be next on my wish list.
 
#63      
As a purist, I don't like this.
I agree. I wish there were still 10 B1G teams, a dozen post season bowls, the Rose Bowl as the be-all and end-all goal for the conference, and writers voting in the national champion. But, I also yell at clouds so what do I know.

However, since we have to accept the reality of conference cannibalism, I like it that the B1G is a major mover and shaker in this event, and we won't get swallowed up by another conference and become the Midwest division of the SEC.
 
#66      

madillini4

Ozamataz Buckshank
Millywaukee
9A17D47B-2AED-4F32-BCC1-C1FB538FCCB1.jpeg
 
#68      
Ok, the 24 team league setup I posted about a week or two ago was just supposed to be a crazy idea but I guess we'll see where things go from here. What are Oregon, Washington, Cal-Berkeley, Stanford, etc. going to do now?
The Mountain West needs teams
 
#69      

dgcrow

Kelso, WA
I would think Oregon and Arizona would be next two best options. Then Stanford, Washington and Colorado.
I grew up in Urbana and went to Washington for my graduate degree. Simply mind boggling that UW could end up in the Big Ten! :oops:
 
#70      

Joel Goodson

respect my decision™
I don't necessarily like that we're moving to two mega conferences, but I am at least happy the Big 10 is one of those two conferences.

What would be great is if the Big Ten can crush the SEC and what remains of the rest of the major conferences, expand into all the P5/P6 schools, and divide them up into subgroups. Let's call them "leagues" for lack of a better word. And each "league" can be more or less geographical and incorporate traditional rivalries and play a league championship at the end of the season, after which there can be some kind of national post-season where the best team from each league can compete for the overall Big Ten/national championship. That would be cool.

So, basically the Borg. I like it.
 
#71      
I would think Oregon and Arizona would be next two best options. Then Stanford, Washington and Colorado.
This is all about TV money, right? Well, SF/SJ/Oakland media market is 6th biggest in the US, so I think Stanford and/or Cal would be prioritized over all others. Plus, those two bring the biggest academic cachet, and enormous strength in non-revenue sports (240 national championships!). Those two schools are the two most marketable remaining in a rump PAC. By far.

Phoenix is a big media market, but Az shares it with ASU, which won't get in due to academics. Seattle is #12 market, and UW dominates there, so maybe? Denver has a smaller market but geography might help the Buffs.

In the end, though, you want to create a bigger pie, and limit the slices, so I don't think inviting many (or any) beyond the California teams makes much sense, unless the end game is the BIG-24. Kind of like the SEC only picking up Texas and OU.
 
#73      

orange100

time to hop on the wife
I don't necessarily like that we're moving to two mega conferences, but I am at least happy the Big 10 is one of those two conferences.

What would be great is if the Big Ten can crush the SEC and what remains of the rest of the major conferences, expand into all the P5/P6 schools, and divide them up into subgroups. Let's call them "leagues" for lack of a better word. And each "league" can be more or less geographical and incorporate traditional rivalries and play a league championship at the end of the season, after which there can be some kind of national post-season where the best team from each league can compete for the overall Big Ten/national championship. That would be cool.
Yeah! We could call those regional "leagues" Conferences and then we could... oh wait.
 
#74      
As long as ND has a path to the playoffs, they'll never join a conference.
My crystal ball...The Big 10 is likely to have it's own playoff and champion, and the SEC will have its own playoff and champion. The two winners will meet for the national championship. I think the Big 10 does go to 20 and the SEC goes to 24. Everyone else is on the outside looking in. Swarbrick's got some thinking to do.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.