Wisconsin 91, Illinois 88 OT Postgame

Status
Not open for further replies.
#1,126      
I am tired of Brad saying we are built for March when obviously we are not. I believe we have reached the ceiling with our program with Brad as the HC. He is paid to not only win games but to have some success in the tourney. We are 6-4 in NCAA games with Brad. I really do not want to hear, well, Brad inherited a mess. Dusty May inherited a mess and look where they are. Hurley inherited a mess at UConn. Florida, Alabama the list goes on. We haven’t had a true point guard since McCamey. Another thing, the everyday guy thing is getting old. We need athletes who are ballers. It’s time to change our recruiting and get 10 guys who can play high D1 ball. We have 8 and we are fatigued as you can see it. We played the majority of the conference season with 8 and sometimes 7 and once with 6 guys and we have nothing left. This is so similar to the 2022 season. It’s time for a change of philosophy.

But yall say this pretty much every year and he just gets bigger contract and extension… currently thru 2031
 
#1,128      
We're gonna win the first game next week. We may win a second time next week; I sure hope so. We probably won't win during week two of the NCAA tournament, but there is a tiny chance of that happening. And then, most likely, it will be time to start rebuilding a roster/staff/culture that can win an actual, real-life, not metrics-based, but actual in-the-flesh and no-whining championship. Maybe a B1G championship. Maybe at B1G Tournament Championship. Maybe the championship that Coach Underwood has set his sights on: the NCAA Tournament (National) Championship.

I have a savage, visceral, bleeding hope that Underwood will find a way to win a championship that matters. Give him the money, hold his fat feet to the flames until he howls, and let the blockhead with the heart of a champion and the vocabulary of a John Deere-dependent corn farmer rip. If not year 9 of the Underwood era, then let's roll in year 10. And 11.

1773528586643.png
 
#1,130      
Just a genuine question - If Brad is as good of a coach as so many on here think he is …

How come every time there’s a big opening he’s never mentioned ?

Especially before the newest extension …
That is a great question. Hmm 🤔
 
#1,131      
Let’s look into this closer.
Over last 7 years
Houston 1 runner up 1 FF 1EE + 3 Sw 16
Duke 1 FF 1EE and JS only been there a few years
Arizona 3 Sw16 TL got a few years until he gets to 7 years
UConn 2 Championships
Purdue runner up 1EE 3 Sw16
Alabama 1FF 1 EE 2 Sw16
Kansas 1 Championship 1 FF
Illinois 1 EE

We honestly don’t measure up to these other teams on this list and if you think we do you are fooling yourself. Jmo
Okay? But they were all ahead of Illinois on the list. Look back at my post, we were NINTH.

We only need to be top 10, since this was the comment everyone was crucifying:
top ten coach in the country over the last 6-7 years
Here’s the rest of the list after Illinois:

1. Houston: 86.6%
2. Duke: 79.7%
3. Arizona: 78.4%
4. UCONN: 78.3%
5. Purdue: 76.4%
6. Alabama: 72.7%
7. Tennessee: 72.7%
8. Kansas: 72.5%
9. Illinois: 70.3%
….
10. UCLA: 69.3%
11. North Carolina: 69.1%
12. Baylor: 69.0%
13. Auburn: 68.7%
14. Virginia: 68.2%
15. Florida: 68.2%

Take this however you’d wish. All of the teams after us:

have had at least one TRAINWRECK season in that 7-year timespan (so much so that some have even fired their coach).

but yes, have made a F4 (other than Virginia). I’m certainly not blaming folks for craving more March success. It’s just there’s a logical limit.

I, personally, would much rather hang my hat on consistency. If you keep knocking on the door with high seeds — year after year — it’s more significantly more likely than not your time will come.
 
Last edited:
#1,132      
This … It’s as simple as this …

Get a REAL coach … Brad is more CEO than coach and that’s fine …

You’ve got MILLIONS for this staff … Go find a guy who can flat out coach … We need to have actual set plays …

My other issue is roster construction … It needs work … If you’re going to run this offense you better have guys who can flat out SHOOT … In this league, we HAVE to also get more athletic … It’s not negotiable …
For Brad not to see that our lack of athletic ability and just flat out being slow was going to be a huge problem during the summer is mind boggling. It’s one of the big issues I had when he was putting this roster together.
 
#1,133      
But yall say this pretty much every year and he just gets bigger contract and extension… currently thru 2031
If I was Josh Whitman, and if as well this year's team does not make it to the Sweet Sixteen, I would for the coming year offer Brad Underwood no raise and no extension.

In his post-season review, I would tell Underwood: "You've been selling 'Final Four' for several seasons now. I love that, 100%. I love it. Because our diehard fans dream of the Fighting Illini in the Final Four. They lavish their attention and love on this basketball program, on this place, on their alma mater. And because, selfishly, I want this program and this school to win it all."

"All of it. Not close to winning it all; not winning some sort of statistical construct; not almost won it, and not coulda, and not if only. Win.It.All."

"Until then, is there anything we really need to discuss? Just win, baby. Right?"
 

Attachments

  • 1773529522043.png
    1773529522043.png
    552.5 KB · Views: 21
#1,134      
I get where you are coming from. I just can’t bring myself to move off BU yet after bringing the program back from the dead. There is a shelf life though and the next couple of weeks are going to be important. How will we all respond in the following scenarios?
1. Round 1 upset? (I am probably with you then)
2. Round 2 defeat (big disappointment)
3. Sweet 16 loss (appeases me)
4. Elite 8 loss (satisfied)
5. FF loss (thrilled)
6. Runner Up (Ecstatic)
7. Champion (lifetime contract)
So I've definitely been pretty unhappy with how Brad handled the late game today and his overall in game coaching, but I think there's nuance here. I'm not advocating for a coaching change or to fire Brad. In fact I don't think we should do that unless we have someone lined up you just can't say no to. And Brad has proven he can build a program and recruit at a high level. Those are no small feats and he's been good at that.

Instead I would advocate for hiring strong X and O assistant or game coaches this offseason. If that coach is solely in charge of timeout management, OOB plays, and a couple set plays for late game situations, so be it.
 
#1,136      
You are drunk. Weber would get eaten alive in this environment.
I liked Weber a lot and you're absolutely correct. The NIL era is almost the exact opposite of his coaching strengths. He'd fail miserably here as a head coach in this era. But, if we were to give him a million dollars to be our defensive game coach or special consultant in charge of running defensive drills for the team in practice, I would say that might be money very very very well spent
 
#1,138      
I liked Weber a lot and you're absolutely correct. The NIL era is almost the exact opposite of his coaching strengths. He'd fail miserably here as a head coach in this era. But, if we were to give him a million dollars to be our defensive game coach or special consultant in charge of running defensive drills for the team in practice, I would say that might be money very very very well spent
Weber could easily (or at least likely) succeed with someone else as his primary recruiter/bag man.
 
#1,139      
Well stated.

One other thought - this seasons success came down to two things: Finding an undervalued Keyton Wagler and an undervalued David Mirkovic that we could afford. This "business model" scares me.
What scares me is if we change coaches can the new coach find guys like this? Ty is out, Morez got poached, we lost players we couldn’t afford, but still are having a great year with a team that can still potentially win it all. MI had to beat WI on a last second 3pt shot. We aren’t bad and we can play much better.
 
#1,140      
#1,141      
Using the B1G tournament seeding, from Michigan #1 through Penn State #18, and considering the league in tiers (1-6, 7-12, 13-18), this year's Fighitng Illini team went in a total of 21 games:

1-6 against Tier 1 (Michigan - Nebraska - Michigan St - (Illini) - Wisconsin - UCLA)
14-0 against Tier 2 (Purdue - Ohio St - Iowa - Indiana - Minnesota - Washington) and Tier 3 (USC - Rutgers - Northwestern - Maryland - Oregon - Penn St)

This year's Illini reliably defeat teams they are better than. They struggle badly against teams at their level (Nebraska, Michigan St, Wisconsin, UCLA) and above their level (Michigan).

In the round of 64, this crude analysis predicts the Illini win, almost guaranteed.

In the round of 32, the Illini may win but as a 3 seed they may run into a team like Wisconsin of UCLA, which this year's Illini have often lost to. Making the Sweet 16 will be a challenge. Making the Elite 8, from this crude analysis, appears very unlikely.
 
#1,142      
I liked Weber a lot and you're absolutely correct. The NIL era is almost the exact opposite of his coaching strengths. He'd fail miserably here as a head coach in this era. But, if we were to give him a million dollars to be our defensive game coach or special consultant in charge of running defensive drills for the team in practice, I would say that might be money very very very well spent
Weber didn’t lose when he had equal or better talent. His weaknesses is he had no ability to recruit. Give him a checkbook and he dominates.
 
#1,143      
I agree …

With us being an elite program and elite position … Would other schools not want to try and poach our coach ?
On the one hand we think we are going to land Nate Oats or Todd Golden, but on the other hand we think we are a stepping stone program and the only reason BU hasn't moved on is everybody thinks he's bad. No logical consistency, just whatever advances the anti-BU narrative at that given moment.
 
#1,144      
Well stated.

One other thought - this seasons success came down to two things: Finding an undervalued Keyton Wagler and an undervalued David Mirkovic that we could afford. This "business model" scares me.
Exactly. The staff deserve all the credit in the world for bringing in Keaton and putting him in a position to excel. And the same for David.

At the same time -- this is not criticism, it is a critique -- is this a recruiting system than can bring championships? I sure hope so.
 
#1,145      
Oh my gosh. Thank you for putting this together! The fire BU crowd should read this everyday before posting. Every school that has had some level of success in the past thinks they just need a new coach to get back there. They fail 99% of the time.

Check This Out Cookie Monster GIF by Sesame Street
But the grass is always greener…
 
  • Like
Reactions: csd
#1,146      
... I'm not advocating for a coaching change or to fire Brad. In fact I don't think we should do that unless we have someone lined up you just can't say no to. And Brad has proven he can build a program and recruit at a high level. Those are no small feats and he's been good at that.

Instead I would advocate for hiring strong X and O assistant or game coaches this offseason. If that coach is solely in charge of timeout management, OOB plays, and a couple set plays for late game situations, so be it.
I agree 100%.
 
#1,147      
I am tired of Brad saying we are built for March when obviously we are not. I believe we have reached the ceiling with our program with Brad as the HC. He is paid to not only win games but to have some success in the tourney. We are 6-4 in NCAA games with Brad. I really do not want to hear, well, Brad inherited a mess. Dusty May inherited a mess and look where they are. Hurley inherited a mess at UConn. Florida, Alabama the list goes on. We haven’t had a true point guard since McCamey. Another thing, the everyday guy thing is getting old. We need athletes who are ballers. It’s time to change our recruiting and get 10 guys who can play high D1 ball. We have 8 and we are fatigued as you can see it. We played the majority of the conference season with 8 and sometimes 7 and once with 6 guys and we have nothing left. This is so similar to the 2022 season. It’s time for a change of philosophy.
I’ve also wondered if BU is pushing them too hard in practice during the season. Player injuries and as you said, obvious fatigue by end of season. Practices don’t need to be like ‘Nam.

I’d also like more Americans and limit our “ic” count to 2-3 max next year. We need dawgs. Only Mirkovic fits that bill.
 
#1,148      
Bingo … And just because a coach isn’t top 10 wherever he’s at now …

With our resources could he elevate us with his coaching and roster construction ? That’s the question we need to be asking …

Because I don’t think anyone’s arguing what Brad has done is good … It’s been good … But it hasn’t been great … It just simply hasn’t …

And I don’t want our program to just be good … We can be ELITE … Enough with the settling to be good because oh my gosh we improved from the Groce era BS …

And I’m not saying we have to win a natty every year but with our resources you better be making the second weekend consistently … Is every other year too much to ask ???

We’re staring at 1/9 right now … For what we spend … Not good enough …

And for crying out loud … Get a guy on this gosh dang staff who can DRAW UP AN F’ING PLAY !!!!!!!!!!!!!
This won't be popular but I would legitimately hire Luke Murray. Best offensive scheme in the country.

It's only a matter of time before he gets a major head coaching gig and if that happens I think he's on a short list for a blue blood soon after. Get him early, win, and retain him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back