Apparently Justin Smith down to IU and Nova
100% CB to IU, with 9 of them changing today.
Now that changes things with Wilkes to IU if it's true.
Apparently Justin Smith down to IU and Nova
If Smith picks IU, does that have any effect on Wilkes?
They both are small forwards, so it couldn't hurt our cause.
Sure, but Jackson wasn't a one and done. I was responding to your response to this:Sure. You can do better. But a guy who is a four year solid contributor and grows into one of the elite players in the conference is a higher total return than any one-and-done this side of Kevin Durant.
Malcolm Hill was a 60-70 ranked recruit and not many of us would trade him for anyone that was ranked higher in his class.
They both are small forwards, so it couldn't hurt our cause.
After a little digging, IU has one senior on the roster this year (Collin Hartman). They have four underclassmen who could declare early (James Blackmon, Jr., Thomas Bryant, De'Ron Davis, and OG Anunoby). I assume that Blackmon will stay (talented kid, but injury issues and lack of prototypical NBA size hold him back). Anunoby and Davis could go either way. I assume that Bryant will leave.
So far, IU has one 2017 commit: 3-star combo guard Al Durham. If they lose Bryant and Davis, they'll have no one notable at PF/C (besides I guess Juwan Morgan). If they take a commitment from Justin Smith, they'll have to bring it at least one more big. If Anunoby stays for his junior year, he'll most likely play the 3.
Maybe that's what Wilkes means about keeping it 100? If IU takes Smith, Anunoby stays, and Bryant and Davis leave, there's a huge glut at both wing positions and minimal talent up front. He might be seeing the writing on the wall with regard to ending up at PF for at least a year.
DeRon Davis is not leaving and you forgot 6'7" JUCO transfer SF Freddie McSwain. Anunoby and Bryant maybe to NBA.
Does anyone know how this looks for UCLA, UConn, or Xavier?Maybe that's what Wilkes means about keeping it 100? If IU takes Smith, Anunoby stays, and Bryant and Davis leave, there's a huge glut at both wing positions and minimal talent up front. He might be seeing the writing on the wall with regard to ending up at PF for at least a year.
Does anyone know how this looks for UCLA, UConn, or Xavier?
I don't know positions, but going by size UCLA seems to have mostly 1/2s and 4/5s. I believe they're also the only Under Armour team on his list. Maybe this is why the crystal ball points to UCLA?
That Malcolm Hill spot is wide open next season. I think Groce has given Wilkes quite a bit to mull over.
Man, Wilkes and Kiir to close out the class, would be awfully good.
If we're talking impact college freshman then I'd put Michael Beasley in that discussion as he actually averaged more points and rebounds per game. I think what gets lost is his off court issues and not producing like a number two pick should.
Hopefully, LA is a bridge too far. Pretty sure Wilkes isn't scared off by Smith, but how many SFs can Clappy take, especially with how few rides they have? IOW, if they take Smith, is that tantamount to throwing in the towel on Wilkes?
Give me Wilkes and Epperson
That Malcolm Hill spot is wide open next season. I think Groce has given Wilkes quite a bit to mull over.
Man, Wilkes and Kiir to close out the class, would be awfully good.
Give me Wilkes and Epperson
I'd take any one of the 3 (Wilkes, Kiir, or Epperson) & not complain.
Seconded. I wouldn't complain about any combination of Wilkes, Kigab, Epperson, and Kiir, though. Are we still in it with any other prospects? Any outside chance a name like Eastern or Victor Bailey re-emerges late in the process?