Or it could prove that our staff is fumbling around in the dark a lot of the time.
Or staff has a great chance at TWO fifth years.
Or it could prove that our staff is fumbling around in the dark a lot of the time.
1. Money is clearly not an issue.Yeah this is the question. Why walk away from what we understand are commitable offers to walk on anywhere?
Or staff has a great chance at TWO fifth years.
Or it could prove that our staff is fumbling around in the dark a lot of the time.
I look at our recruiting class, and see a glass that's either half full, or half empty, depending on your corresponding optimism. I'm ok with it personally --I wasn't expecting miracles.
That said, there were so, so many misses in this cycle. It does not make me confident in our recruiting. If this is our baseline and we start turning things around on the court, we could be fine, but man, how many guys did we whiff on this year?
I look at our recruiting class, and see a glass that's either half full, or half empty, depending on your corresponding optimism. I'm ok with it personally --I wasn't expecting miracles.
That said, there were so, so many misses in this cycle. It does not make me confident in our recruiting. If this is our baseline and we start turning things around on the court, we could be fine, but man, how many guys did we whiff on this year?
I look at our recruiting class, and see a glass that's either half full, or half empty, depending on your corresponding optimism. I'm ok with it personally --I wasn't expecting miracles.
That said, there were so, so many misses in this cycle. It does not make me confident in our recruiting. If this is our baseline and we start turning things around on the court, we could be fine, but man, how many guys did we whiff on this year?
Braun to Mizzou as preferred walk on should prove a few things. 1) he isn’t very good 2) this may be just how desperate Illinois is right now and 3) just how delusional a fan base can be.
"If you're not hearing 'No' a lot more than you're hearing 'Yes' from recruits, then you're recruiting the wrong players." Bill Self
Caroline has been working with the team since the school year ended. Hes still not coming here
The outcome of the recruiting class will have to be judged over the next four years, but the process has been frankly difficult to explain.
As I've said many times, I'm a sucker for plans. I do not see what the plan is here.
1. Money is clearly not an issue.
2. Dream school/family connections
3. Connected to the Porters
At UI, this kid is just in the "we hope he develops and exceeds expectations" group of young bigs. At Mizzou, he probably has a lead on playing time after a red shirt year and Tilmon, Porter leave.

You don't see what the plan is? Length, athleticism and shooting. There's your plan.
The problem is not that there is no plan. The problem is not being able to getting the players to execute it. At least not enough of them.
They need guys to play pickup with and why not do it with top competition.
I guess Nevada isn't like competition or anything. It just seems odd that Nevada would want him doing this and Illinois would let him do it. What if he picks up weird habits or playstyles not in line with Nevada or learns our players strengths and weaknesses etc. Or gets hurt at Illinois' gym. I can't imagine that headline. I mean I get why its good to compete with good talent, just seems weird to me. I've just never heard of another teams player training with a different team in the offseason just for fun, like a summer loan haha.
I wonder what a Fall class start of THT, Nolley and Castleton would have done?
Looks like Kipper will be playing the 4 again. I don't see Ebo and Kane playing together unless Ebo has drastically improved his shooting. That leaves Jones and Giorgio as Kipper's backups. Don't worry about the offense but sure leaves a hole in the defense.
POI If you remove MS, MA, and MF from the 3 pt % (conference) we have the same as our opponents. Three starters that were projected to be good shooters and stunk it up.
It's not like Parker Braun was going to fit much into the PF rotation this season anyways. I mean the guy openly said he probably needed a redshirt year.
I agree which is why filling another slot was important.We may not be getting every player we want, but I definitely see roster construction.
He’s following the Frank Martin approach it would seem. Recruit a bunch of players each class, (preferably highly rated but projects are okay too) bank on about 2-4 being high major quality and sticking around and have the rest transfer.
Rinse and repeat until you have 2-4 per class for class balance, or just never stop recruiting like that since players leave all the time. (Time will tell what we do)
Last year we recruited 5 freshman. TF, MS, GO, DW, and MV. 3 stuck, 2 transferred. I bet by this time next year, our 2018 class will have shrunk by at least 2 players regardless of how successful our year is. (Maybe more since its so big)
The outcome of the recruiting class will have to be judged over the next four years, but the process has been frankly difficult to explain.
As I've said many times, I'm a sucker for plans. I do not see what the plan is here.