bustingbrackets.com
Interesting, our record compared to Iowa, in net rankings. Currently, we have 3 more quad 1 games and 3 less quad 4. 2-1 in the extra quad 1, they are 3-0 in extra quad 4.
Yikes. Austin Peay flashbacks
What a beautiful sight.
Historically speaking , whether it NET era or RPI era, the odds of making the tourney based on ranking:
Duke will come in with a 6 seed.
If Duke Vitale gets to choose...Duke will come in with a 6 seed.
Playing the first weekend in NC. Even if the whole thing is being played in IN. That doesn't apply to Duke.Duke will come in with a 6 seed.
Greensboro or bust!
I cannot believe KU is still ranked
The blue bloods are hemorrhaging.
I think duke and UNC make it in. They’re putting stuff together now and in reality too big of a name and fanbase to be left out if they come down to the bubble. Kentucky is the most precarious. I don’t think MSU has a chance at sniffing the tourney this year
www.ncaa.com
That’s crazy. #4 in the Net and #5 in the KenPom seems nuts but no one else wants it I guess.
Depends on how we end the season, of course. But from my understanding, NET rankings are used less to seed teams and more to measure who you’ve beat & lost to.
IDKWJLIESPN has a braketology in which they project 68, 48 and 16 team fields, due to the uncertainty of how the tourney will play out. Lunardi projects us as a 3 seed in each of those brackets. Now sure how likely, if at all, it is that the tourney gets condensed like that but I think it underlines how important it is to get a higher seed this year. It would certainly be a bummer to be in the 5 or 6 seed range only to see the NCAA decide to go with a smaller 16 team tournament
Men's Bracketology: Memphis this season is, again, predictably unpredictable
The Tigers are so hard to predict not only season to season but game to game. This year's team is no different.www.espn.com
