I couldn't think of a more grossly inaccurate analogy. A kid spends years developing his skills, most of them are playing both in high school and hitting the road for the AAU circuit, and you say it's a luck? And you want the millions/billions they generate from their work and effort, none of that should go to them, but instead to the beauracrats who run the sport? I have a hard time understanding how someone thinks they're entitled to distributing money that way. The free market certainly disagrees.