Thanks, wasn't aware.we offered shortly after OA re-joined the fold. so, jah, we're interested. guessing quite interested
Yes, great points. Reed’s ability to shoot the 3 is way ahead of Fears, but I like the historical ranking context. Fears reclassing to ‘24 should drop him in the rankings, though not sure how/if the composite factors in age and physical readiness.The way that fans, coaches, players themselves, etc all need to pretend every player is going to be taken in the first round of the next year's NBA draft isn't really good for anybody and just makes these discussions fake and dull.
I hope NIL starts to change that.
Also just for the record:
Reed Sheppard: 43rd in the 247 composite for 2023
Jeremiah Fears: 33rd in the 247 composite for 2025
Wait... So Riley wasn't a take in 2024 for UK, but Fears is?![]()
Jeremiah Fears contacted by Kentucky after reclassifying into 2024
Fears just decommitted from Illinois.www.aseaofblue.com
Wait... So Riley wasn't a take in 2024 for UK, but Fears is?
![]()
Position of need matters, I guess? Although they just got BYU pg?Wait... So Riley wasn't a take in 2024 for UK, but Fears is?
![]()
And to add a little more to this … We’ve got an open ride …
And if anyone’s learned anything about Brad … If he can upgrade the talent … He will … He will recruit over kids …
You add Jasper to this team and it’s a no doubt top 5 preseason team … No doubt … Man would that be fun to watch …
We're putting this down as a good thing?
It's way ahead of just about everyone. Someone said 52% over one season of college ball. If anyone shoots that on reasonably high volume against good competition, they're a 1st round pick, regardless of their other qualities.Yes, great points. Reed’s ability to shoot the 3 is way ahead of Fears, but I like the historical ranking context. Fears reclassing to ‘24 should drop him in the rankings, though not sure how/if the composite factors in age and physical readiness.
Sure seems to be helping us out to say the least...I don't want him to be a one and done.It sounds more and more like the only sure one-and-done next year is Pope.
Yeah, which is why Reed shot up draft boards compared to his recruiting ranking (which ChiefGritty called out), was the 3rd overall pick, and top American drafted.It's way ahead of just about everyone. Someone said 52% over one season of college ball. If anyone shoots that on reasonably high volume against good competition, they're a 1st round pick, regardless of their other qualities.
I take a slightly different viewpoint, and this has nothing to do with the new reality of NIL. The job of the coach is to always be looking at ways of upgrading the roster, even if it means "recruiting" over players. At top flight programs, you always strive to have the best players you can get. If players start seeing their role diminishing more than they want (or perceive promised), then it is in their best interest to move on. If we want to be a top-tier school, it is time we act like the top-tier programs. Brad clearly gets it, and I am glad this is the direction we have gone.I don't think it's a good thing, but it's the reality of the NIL world we find ourselves living in. Gone are the days of the 2-4yr player development program. Players want to play/get paid today not 1-2 years down the road, so they leave at the sniff of a better opportunity elsewhere. Likewise, any smart coach has taken his 2-4yr team development blueprint and tossed it out the window. They have to recruit with the intention to make the team better today, not in 2 years, because the talent necessary to win a natty isn't sticking around that long.
Personally I find this to be a bit of a sad state of affairs, but it's what's necessary to win.
I don't think it's a good thing, but it's the reality of the NIL world we find ourselves living in. Gone are the days of the 2-4yr player development program. Players want to play/get paid today not 1-2 years down the road, so they leave at the sniff of a better opportunity elsewhere. Likewise, any smart coach has taken his 2-4yr team development blueprint and tossed it out the window. They have to recruit with the intention to make the team better today, not in 2 years, because the talent necessary to win a natty isn't sticking around that long.
Personally I find this to be a bit of a sad state of affairs, but it's what's necessary to win.
We're putting this down as a good thing?
Seriously this is the viewpoint stemming from the possibility of adding a top 10 player?I don't think it's a good thing
Goodhere's my thought and observation from my minutes of film study. Boswell is a little out of shape, hasn't
worked hard on his body ever (or at least for a number of months) and needs a summer of Fletch and
top level scrimmaging to be up to speed. by October, he'll be ready to roll.
Yeah, player development is now at the NBA level. At least with the LakersI don't think it's a good thing, but it's the reality of the NIL world we find ourselves living in. Gone are the days of the 2-4yr player development program. Players want to play/get paid today not 1-2 years down the road, so they leave at the sniff of a better opportunity elsewhere. Likewise, any smart coach has taken his 2-4yr team development blueprint and tossed it out the window. They have to recruit with the intention to make the team better today, not in 2 years, because the talent necessary to win a natty isn't sticking around that long.
Personally I find this to be a bit of a sad state of affairs, but it's what's necessary to win.
Yeah, player development is now at the NBA level. At least with the Lakers
Somehow it got pushed from 7 to 9.I would have been really impressed if you posted this in both the 7 and the 9
The question is, but at what cost? Your word carries value and when the value of your word is damaged.... you've got real problems.Seriously this is the viewpoint stemming from the possibility of adding a top 10 player?
LOL
The job of the coach isn't to upgrade the roster. It's to win. Cal was wearing out his welcome for that very reason.I take a slightly different viewpoint, and this has nothing to do with the new reality of NIL. The job of the coach is to always be looking at ways of upgrading the roster, even if it means "recruiting" over players. At top flight programs, you always strive to have the best players you can get. If players start seeing their role diminishing more than they want (or perceive promised), then it is in their best interest to move on. If we want to be a top-tier school, it is time we act like the top-tier programs. Brad clearly gets it, and I am glad this is the direction we have gone.
The quality of the roster and wins are generally highly correlated. Cal won a ton of basketball games at Kentucky almost every season (as does North Carolina, Duke, Kansas, etc.). His issue was not making it out of the first weekend of the tourney the last 3 seasons (and Kentucky has high standards). Part of that is roster construction, getting team chemistry, and a major part coaching deficiencies.The job of the coach isn't to upgrade the roster. It's to win. Cal was wearing out his welcome for that very reason.
All that glitters isn't gold. Finding shiny new jewels and randomly adding them to a necklace doesn't necessarily make it more beautiful.
There's all sorts of spin out there but we essentially dumped podz two years ago to get skyy Clark.
Last year was a master class on team chemistry. It remains to be seen which of the last two years this season will most resemble.
There's all sorts of spin out there but we essentially dumped podz two years ago to get skyy Clark.
Some seriously weird takes going on here today. Upgrading the talent of the roster is a ALWAYS a good thing. It was a good thing in the past and it’s a good thing in the present.
If you don’t want to be “recruited over” then get better.