Illini Basketball 2024-2025

Status
Not open for further replies.
#1      

Dan

Admin
Welcome to the Illini Basketball 2024-2025 & College Basketball news thread :illinois:


Tickets | Schedule | Roster


2024-2025 Illini Basketball 12-4 (4-2)
DateOpponentResult
Mon, Nov 4Eastern IllinoisW 112-67
Fri, Nov 8SIU EdwardsvilleW 90-58
Wed, Nov 13OaklandW 66-54
Wed, Nov 20AlabamaL 87-100
Sat, Nov 23Maryland Eastern ShoreW 87-40
Mon, Nov 25Little RockW 92-34
Thu, Nov 28ArkansasW 90-77
Fri, Dec 6at NorthwesternL 66-70 OT
Tue, Dec 10WisconsinW 86-80
Sat, Dec 14TennesseeL 64-66
Sun, Dec 22MissouriW 80-77
Sun, Dec 29Chicago StateW 117-64
Thu, Jan 2at OregonW 109-77
Sun, Jan 5at WashingtonW 81-77
Wed, Jan 8Penn StateW 91-52
Sat, Jan 11USCL 72-82
Tue, Jan 14at Indiana6:00pm Peacock
Sun, Jan 19at Michigan State11:00am CBS
Thu, Jan 23Maryland8:00pm FS1
Sun, Jan 26Northwestern2:00pm BTN
Thu, Jan 30at Nebraska7:30pm FS1
Sun, Feb 2Ohio State12:00pm CBS
Wed, Feb 5at Rutgers7:30pm BTN
Sat, Feb 8at Minnesota5:00pm BTN
Tue, Feb 11UCLA7:00pm Peacock
Sat, Feb 15Michigan State7:00pm FOX
Tue, Feb 18at Wisconsin7:30pm FS1
Sat, Feb 22Duke
(New York)
7:00pm FOX
Tue, Feb 25Iowa8:00pm FS1
Sun, Mar 2at Michigan2:45pm CBS
Fri, Mar 7Purdue7:00pm FOX

All times CT
 
Last edited:
#2      
dave-chappelle-blouse.gif
 
#7      
A look at our remaining games by quadrant! A reminder of how it works:

Home: Q1 #1-30, Q2 #31-75, Q3 #76-160, Q4 #161-353
Neutral: Q1 #1-50, Q2 #51-100, Q3 #101-200, Q4 #201-353
Away: Q1 #1-75, Q2 #76-135, Q3 #135-240, Q4 #241-353

Wins in green, losses in red and future games in normal font. Neutral site games will always have the location in parentheses, and within each tier the teams are listed by NET ranking - NOT by how close that game is to moving from one tier to another.

Quad 1: 3-3
L 64-66 vs. #2 Tennessee
L 87-100 vs. #10 Alabama (Birmingham, AL)

W 109-77 at #23 Oregon
W 90-77 vs. #37 Arkansas (Kansas City, MO)

L 66-70 in OT at #45 Northwestern
W 80-77 vs. #48 Missouri (St. Louis, MO)
vs. #3 Duke (New York, NY)
at #11 Michigan
vs. #15 UCLA
vs. #17 Maryland
vs. #21 Ohio State
at #26 Michigan State
vs. #26 Michigan State
at #33 Wisconsin
at #44 Nebraska
at #62 Indiana

Quad 2: 1-0
W 86-80 vs. #33 Wisconsin
vs. #31 Purdue
vs. #41 Penn State
vs. #45 Northwestern
vs. #49 Iowa
at #84 Rutgers
at #95 Washington

Quad 3: 0-0
vs. #91 USC
at #165 Minnesota

Quad 4: 6-0
W 66-54 vs. #202 Oakland
W 92-34 vs. #208 Little Rock
W 90-58 vs. #246 SIU Edwardsville
W 112-67 vs. #292 Eastern Illinois
W 87-40 vs. #355 Maryland Eastern Shore
W 117-64 vs. #356 Chicago State


So my initial thoughts:

1. If you think that seems like a huge number of Quad 1 games, you are right! We had played 11 Quad 1 games last year before the BTT, and this would be SIXTEEN, with home games vs. Purdue and Wisconsin being RIGHT on the edge.

2. A lot of our games are actually pretty "safe" right now. None of our Quad 1 losses are likely to fall to Quad 2, and Mizzou is the only of our Quad 1 wins that is in any jeopardy of slipping (at least right now, and unless Arkansas collapses). As much as it sucks, root for Mizzou to stay in the top 50. It isn't just good for our resume, it is better for the rivalry long-term for us to beat GOOD Mizzou teams every year in a great environment in St. Louis!

3. On that note, I always find it kind of fun to watch teams' NET ranking and hope they can slide into the next tier up, haha. I have zero faith Wisconsin will regain Quad 1 status at home (i.e., top 30), but I think Purdue can sneak back in there. Looking just at today's rankings, we are very lucky to get #11 Michigan, #15 UCLA, #17 Maryland and #21 Ohio State only at home. They are ALL Quad 1 opportunities on our own home floor.

4. I really want Rutgers to get it together and get back into the top 75. They are REALLY struggling, and right now that away game is Quad 2. While I think we are the better team, that game scares me right now ... RU has a ton of talent, and the RAC is one of the best atmospheres in the Big Ten when it is "on." Yeah, I know we destroyed them there last year, but ... many more losses there by some of our good teams before that!!

5. We have such an exciting schedule left with so many opportunities for big wins and very few opportunities for resume-hurting losses. Right now, there are only two games I will watch with more anxiety than enjoyment - January 11th at home vs. USC and February 8th at Minnesota. Those are our only two remaining Quad 3+ games, and we cannot lose either one, period. I don't think we will, but I have a much easier time enjoying those Quad 1 and Quad 2 opportunities ... MUCH less stressful!!

6. Here are a few games of ours that are currently close to sliding up or down:

- Quad 1 win vs. #48 Missouri in St. Louis becomes Quad 2 if they fall out of the top 50.
- Quad 1 road game at #62 Indiana becomes Quad 2 if they fall out of the top 75 ... a ways to go but DEFINITELY possible, lol.
- Quad 2 win vs. #33 Wisconsin moves from Quad 2 to Quad 1 if they climb back into the top 30.
- Quad 2 season finale game vs. #31 Purdue becomes Quad 1 if they climb into the top 30.
- Quad 2 road game at #84 Rutgers becomes Quad 1 if they get into the top 75.

7. And finally, since I enjoy this and am an ardent defender of AT LEAST the first couple BTT games mattering for a team's seeding (we all know Sunday is too late to count), here is where each potential BTT opponent would fall on a neutral court in Indianapolis!

Quad 1
#11 Michigan
#15 UCLA
#17 Maryland
#21 Ohio State
#23 Oregon
#26 Michigan State
#31 Purdue
#33 Wisconsin
#41 Penn State
#44 Nebraska
#45 Northwestern
#49 Iowa

Quad 2
#62 Indiana
#84 Rutgers
#91 USC
#95 Washington

Quad 3
#165 Minnesota
 
#9      
A look at our remaining games by quadrant! A reminder of how it works:

Home: Q1 #1-30, Q2 #31-75, Q3 #76-160, Q4 #161-353
Neutral: Q1 #1-50, Q2 #51-100, Q3 #101-200, Q4 #201-353
Away: Q1 #1-75, Q2 #76-135, Q3 #135-240, Q4 #241-353

Wins in green, losses in red and future games in normal font. Neutral site games will always have the location in parentheses, and within each tier the teams are listed by NET ranking - NOT by how close that game is to moving from one tier to another.

Quad 1: 3-3
L 64-66 vs. #2 Tennessee
L 87-100 vs. #10 Alabama (Birmingham, AL)

W 109-77 at #23 Oregon
W 90-77 vs. #37 Arkansas (Kansas City, MO)

L 66-70 in OT at #45 Northwestern
W 80-77 vs. #48 Missouri (St. Louis, MO)
vs. #3 Duke (New York, NY)
at #11 Michigan
vs. #15 UCLA
vs. #17 Maryland
vs. #21 Ohio State
at #26 Michigan State
vs. #26 Michigan State
at #33 Wisconsin
at #44 Nebraska
at #62 Indiana

Quad 2: 1-0
W 86-80 vs. #33 Wisconsin
vs. #31 Purdue
vs. #41 Penn State
vs. #45 Northwestern
vs. #49 Iowa
at #84 Rutgers
at #95 Washington

Quad 3: 0-0
vs. #91 USC
at #165 Minnesota

Quad 4: 6-0
W 66-54 vs. #202 Oakland
W 92-34 vs. #208 Little Rock
W 90-58 vs. #246 SIU Edwardsville
W 112-67 vs. #292 Eastern Illinois
W 87-40 vs. #355 Maryland Eastern Shore
W 117-64 vs. #356 Chicago State


So my initial thoughts:

1. If you think that seems like a huge number of Quad 1 games, you are right! We had played 11 Quad 1 games last year before the BTT, and this would be SIXTEEN, with home games vs. Purdue and Wisconsin being RIGHT on the edge.

2. A lot of our games are actually pretty "safe" right now. None of our Quad 1 losses are likely to fall to Quad 2, and Mizzou is the only of our Quad 1 wins that is in any jeopardy of slipping (at least right now, and unless Arkansas collapses). As much as it sucks, root for Mizzou to stay in the top 50. It isn't just good for our resume, it is better for the rivalry long-term for us to beat GOOD Mizzou teams every year in a great environment in St. Louis!

3. On that note, I always find it kind of fun to watch teams' NET ranking and hope they can slide into the next tier up, haha. I have zero faith Wisconsin will regain Quad 1 status at home (i.e., top 30), but I think Purdue can sneak back in there. Looking just at today's rankings, we are very lucky to get #11 Michigan, #15 UCLA, #17 Maryland and #21 Ohio State only at home. They are ALL Quad 1 opportunities on our own home floor.

4. I really want Rutgers to get it together and get back into the top 75. They are REALLY struggling, and right now that away game is Quad 2. While I think we are the better team, that game scares me right now ... RU has a ton of talent, and the RAC is one of the best atmospheres in the Big Ten when it is "on." Yeah, I know we destroyed them there last year, but ... many more losses there by some of our good teams before that!!

5. We have such an exciting schedule left with so many opportunities for big wins and very few opportunities for resume-hurting losses. Right now, there are only two games I will watch with more anxiety than enjoyment - January 11th at home vs. USC and February 8th at Minnesota. Those are our only two remaining Quad 3+ games, and we cannot lose either one, period. I don't think we will, but I have a much easier time enjoying those Quad 1 and Quad 2 opportunities ... MUCH less stressful!!

6. Here are a few games of ours that are currently close to sliding up or down:

- Quad 1 win vs. #48 Missouri in St. Louis becomes Quad 2 if they fall out of the top 50.
- Quad 1 road game at #62 Indiana becomes Quad 2 if they fall out of the top 75 ... a ways to go but DEFINITELY possible, lol.
- Quad 2 win vs. #33 Wisconsin moves from Quad 2 to Quad 1 if they climb back into the top 30.
- Quad 2 season finale game vs. #31 Purdue becomes Quad 1 if they climb into the top 30.
- Quad 2 road game at #84 Rutgers becomes Quad 1 if they get into the top 75.

7. And finally, since I enjoy this and am an ardent defender of AT LEAST the first couple BTT games mattering for a team's seeding (we all know Sunday is too late to count), here is where each potential BTT opponent would fall on a neutral court in Indianapolis!

Quad 1
#11 Michigan
#15 UCLA
#17 Maryland
#21 Ohio State
#23 Oregon
#26 Michigan State
#31 Purdue
#33 Wisconsin
#41 Penn State
#44 Nebraska
#45 Northwestern
#49 Iowa

Quad 2
#62 Indiana
#84 Rutgers
#91 USC
#95 Washington

Quad 3
#165 Minnesota
Last year B1G had Purdue (only ranked team in B1G we played) and Illinois. The rest were lumped together and mostly Quad 2 games.

until last night I wasn't convinced the B1G is all that good this year BUT...Since essentially non conference is done these NET rating won't likely change all that much (correct?) With Washington beating Maryland last night I am assuming that gave Washington a nice jump (and conversely Maryland a drop) but Ohio St beating Michigan St and then losing to Wisconsin will be pretty much a wash (correct?)

All of that to say that the BIG might be better this year than expected - at least the NET says they are. I know our Illini are good, but because of how young we are, wasn't sure if we could make another top 3 finish. Off this huge win it feels like another good/great year and maybe Underwood gets some consideration for coach of the year?
 
#10      
Last year B1G had Purdue (only ranked team in B1G we played) and Illinois. The rest were lumped together and mostly Quad 2 games.

until last night I wasn't convinced the B1G is all that good this year BUT...Since essentially non conference is done these NET rating won't likely change all that much (correct?) With Washington beating Maryland last night I am assuming that gave Washington a nice jump (and conversely Maryland a drop) but Ohio St beating Michigan St and then losing to Wisconsin will be pretty much a wash (correct?)

All of that to say that the BIG might be better this year than expected - at least the NET says they are. I know our Illini are good, but because of how young we are, wasn't sure if we could make another top 3 finish. Off this huge win it feels like another good/great year and maybe Underwood gets some consideration for coach of the year?
It seems that much of the COY is based on exceeding expectations. If we win the BIG would think BU is a shoo in for both his recruiting and performance results. In terms of winning out it would be very surprising to me as we win some big games but lose some that would have been gimmes to me. We are not going to shoot 55% from three in many games but would guarantee wins in those we do.
 
#11      
Off this huge win it feels like another good/great year and maybe Underwood gets some consideration for coach of the year?
He's overdue for coach of the year. Hopefully we make a run at the B1G title and get him one this year. Taking the total roster overhaul into consideration, a top 2 NCAA seed type of season should put him on a short list for national coach of the year, too.

Slightly OT but I saw that graphic again of BU being 4th all time in wins at Illinois. Since 2019-2020, he has averaged 23.4 wins per year. If he sustains that average, he'll need just 11 more years after this one to pass Lou for #1 in all time wins at Illinois. I think that would put him at 72 years old. Just kind of crazy to take a step back and realize we may be watching an all time Illini legend in the making.

With the court already named after Henson, perhaps we could name the parking lot after Brad. I don't think he'd mind.
 
#12      
He's overdue for coach of the year. Hopefully we make a run at the B1G title and get him one this year. Taking the total roster overhaul into consideration, a top 2 NCAA seed type of season should put him on a short list for national coach of the year, too.

Slightly OT but I saw that graphic again of BU being 4th all time in wins at Illinois. Since 2019-2020, he has averaged 23.4 wins per year. If he sustains that average, he'll need just 11 more years after this one to pass Lou for #1 in all time wins at Illinois. I think that would put him at 72 years old. Just kind of crazy to take a step back and realize we may be watching an all time Illini legend in the making.

With the court already named after Henson, perhaps we could name the parking lot after Brad. I don't think he'd mind.
Think the Pizza Hut lot is already named after him. Smart advertising for them if they pay for the rights. Hope they give me a commission for the idea.
 
#13      
It seems that much of the COY is based on exceeding expectations. If we win the BIG would think BU is a shoo in for both his recruiting and performance results. In terms of winning out it would be very surprising to me as we win some big games but lose some that would have been gimmes to me. We are not going to shoot 55% from three in many games but would guarantee wins in those we do.
Don't see any scenario of Illinois winning out. Preseason rankings had Illinois anywhere between 3-12 in the conference. Based on expectations and potential results and top 1-2-3 finish plus complete roster overhaul - Should get coach in the COY conversation.
 
#14      
Don't see any scenario of Illinois winning out. Preseason rankings had Illinois anywhere between 3-12 in the conference. Based on expectations and potential results and top 1-2-3 finish plus complete roster overhaul - Should get coach in the COY conversation.
Agreed. Every conference game, especially those on the road, is a trap game. We're going to lose games here and there, maybe against teams that we are better than. It happens.
 
#15      
Last year B1G had Purdue (only ranked team in B1G we played) and Illinois. The rest were lumped together and mostly Quad 2 games.

until last night I wasn't convinced the B1G is all that good this year BUT...Since essentially non conference is done these NET rating won't likely change all that much (correct?) With Washington beating Maryland last night I am assuming that gave Washington a nice jump (and conversely Maryland a drop) but Ohio St beating Michigan St and then losing to Wisconsin will be pretty much a wash (correct?)

All of that to say that the BIG might be better this year than expected - at least the NET says they are. I know our Illini are good, but because of how young we are, wasn't sure if we could make another top 3 finish. Off this huge win it feels like another good/great year and maybe Underwood gets some consideration for coach of the year?
Maryland dropped from 12 to 17. Washington went up from 106 to 95. You can see moves here


Also, if you click on a team you can see all the season long moves, a summary of all the rankings by various outlets (kenpon, torvik, etc) and the schedule with all the games listed by quadrant.

 
#16      
He's overdue for coach of the year. Hopefully we make a run at the B1G title and get him one this year. Taking the total roster overhaul into consideration, a top 2 NCAA seed type of season should put him on a short list for national coach of the year, too.

Slightly OT but I saw that graphic again of BU being 4th all time in wins at Illinois. Since 2019-2020, he has averaged 23.4 wins per year. If he sustains that average, he'll need just 11 more years after this one to pass Lou for #1 in all time wins at Illinois. I think that would put him at 72 years old. Just kind of crazy to take a step back and realize we may be watching an all time Illini legend in the making.

With the court already named after Henson, perhaps we could name the parking lot after Brad. I don't think he'd mind.
I would be willing to fund a Pizza Hut franchise in the lot and name the building/lot in his honor.
 
#17      
A look at our remaining games by quadrant! A reminder of how it works:

Home: Q1 #1-30, Q2 #31-75, Q3 #76-160, Q4 #161-353
Neutral: Q1 #1-50, Q2 #51-100, Q3 #101-200, Q4 #201-353
Away: Q1 #1-75, Q2 #76-135, Q3 #135-240, Q4 #241-353

Wins in green, losses in red and future games in normal font. Neutral site games will always have the location in parentheses, and within each tier the teams are listed by NET ranking - NOT by how close that game is to moving from one tier to another.

Quad 1: 3-3
L 64-66 vs. #2 Tennessee
L 87-100 vs. #10 Alabama (Birmingham, AL)

W 109-77 at #23 Oregon
W 90-77 vs. #37 Arkansas (Kansas City, MO)

L 66-70 in OT at #45 Northwestern
W 80-77 vs. #48 Missouri (St. Louis, MO)
vs. #3 Duke (New York, NY)
at #11 Michigan
vs. #15 UCLA
vs. #17 Maryland
vs. #21 Ohio State
at #26 Michigan State
vs. #26 Michigan State
at #33 Wisconsin
at #44 Nebraska
at #62 Indiana

Quad 2: 1-0
W 86-80 vs. #33 Wisconsin
vs. #31 Purdue
vs. #41 Penn State
vs. #45 Northwestern
vs. #49 Iowa
at #84 Rutgers
at #95 Washington

Quad 3: 0-0
vs. #91 USC
at #165 Minnesota

Quad 4: 6-0
W 66-54 vs. #202 Oakland
W 92-34 vs. #208 Little Rock
W 90-58 vs. #246 SIU Edwardsville
W 112-67 vs. #292 Eastern Illinois
W 87-40 vs. #355 Maryland Eastern Shore
W 117-64 vs. #356 Chicago State


So my initial thoughts:

1. If you think that seems like a huge number of Quad 1 games, you are right! We had played 11 Quad 1 games last year before the BTT, and this would be SIXTEEN, with home games vs. Purdue and Wisconsin being RIGHT on the edge.

2. A lot of our games are actually pretty "safe" right now. None of our Quad 1 losses are likely to fall to Quad 2, and Mizzou is the only of our Quad 1 wins that is in any jeopardy of slipping (at least right now, and unless Arkansas collapses). As much as it sucks, root for Mizzou to stay in the top 50. It isn't just good for our resume, it is better for the rivalry long-term for us to beat GOOD Mizzou teams every year in a great environment in St. Louis!

3. On that note, I always find it kind of fun to watch teams' NET ranking and hope they can slide into the next tier up, haha. I have zero faith Wisconsin will regain Quad 1 status at home (i.e., top 30), but I think Purdue can sneak back in there. Looking just at today's rankings, we are very lucky to get #11 Michigan, #15 UCLA, #17 Maryland and #21 Ohio State only at home. They are ALL Quad 1 opportunities on our own home floor.

4. I really want Rutgers to get it together and get back into the top 75. They are REALLY struggling, and right now that away game is Quad 2. While I think we are the better team, that game scares me right now ... RU has a ton of talent, and the RAC is one of the best atmospheres in the Big Ten when it is "on." Yeah, I know we destroyed them there last year, but ... many more losses there by some of our good teams before that!!

5. We have such an exciting schedule left with so many opportunities for big wins and very few opportunities for resume-hurting losses. Right now, there are only two games I will watch with more anxiety than enjoyment - January 11th at home vs. USC and February 8th at Minnesota. Those are our only two remaining Quad 3+ games, and we cannot lose either one, period. I don't think we will, but I have a much easier time enjoying those Quad 1 and Quad 2 opportunities ... MUCH less stressful!!

6. Here are a few games of ours that are currently close to sliding up or down:

- Quad 1 win vs. #48 Missouri in St. Louis becomes Quad 2 if they fall out of the top 50.
- Quad 1 road game at #62 Indiana becomes Quad 2 if they fall out of the top 75 ... a ways to go but DEFINITELY possible, lol.
- Quad 2 win vs. #33 Wisconsin moves from Quad 2 to Quad 1 if they climb back into the top 30.
- Quad 2 season finale game vs. #31 Purdue becomes Quad 1 if they climb into the top 30.
- Quad 2 road game at #84 Rutgers becomes Quad 1 if they get into the top 75.

7. And finally, since I enjoy this and am an ardent defender of AT LEAST the first couple BTT games mattering for a team's seeding (we all know Sunday is too late to count), here is where each potential BTT opponent would fall on a neutral court in Indianapolis!

Quad 1
#11 Michigan
#15 UCLA
#17 Maryland
#21 Ohio State
#23 Oregon
#26 Michigan State
#31 Purdue
#33 Wisconsin
#41 Penn State
#44 Nebraska
#45 Northwestern
#49 Iowa

Quad 2
#62 Indiana
#84 Rutgers
#91 USC
#95 Washington

Quad 3
#165 Minnesota
Great post - also worth noting that it’s a lot easier for teams to move up/down in the that middle 60-100 range then it is for teams to move around once their in the top 15-20 and as we get later in the year. A 4 game win or loss streak in those 60-100 range has a huge impact on those rankings.
 
#18      
I'm not one to care about Lunardi or early bracketology but the seeding in this bracket is laughably bad.

It looks like he based it off of current Q1 wins for everyone except us.
 
Last edited:
#19      
Lunardi moves us up to a 5 seed. Which just seems like he's using the AP rankings & ignoring NET & Kenpom

He didn't drop Oregon at all, either. It's kind of self-contradictory. He didn't treat last night of devaluing Oregon but apparently didn't buy that it dramatically changes our value.

Bracketologists (not just Lunardi) are some of the least intelligent in the business.
 
#20      
...Since essentially non conference is done these NET rating won't likely change all that much (correct?)...
I'm not an expert, but I believe the only way Big Ten teams' rankings can change significantly now aside from "zero-sum-gain changes" (i.e., Illini beat Oregon, and Illini go up while Oregon goes down ... so ONE Big Ten team benefits at least) is if a Big Ten teams' non-conference opponents either catch fire or totally tank.
 
#24      
Tre White is 37 for 41 on the season on FTs, good for 90.2%. KJ is 86%, Bam is 77%, Ivisic is 73%, Riley is 70%, Morez is 59%. Those are the only players shooting regular FTs (more than one a game) for this team thus far (Ben has shot 10 FT this season)
 
#25      
Tre White is 37 for 41 on the season on FTs, good for 90.2%. KJ is 86%, Bam is 77%, Ivisic is 73%, Riley is 70%, Morez is 59%. Those are the only players shooting regular FTs (more than one a game) for this team thus far (Ben has shot 10 FT this season)
It feels like Riley is below 70%. Morez has definitely improved his stroke from where it was to begin the year.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back