I believe Lunardi (I know he's not the end all, be all) now has Illinois as a #3 seed. How things have changed!
Having two sub-350 teams on our resume is really dragging down a non-conference SOS that includes Tennessee and Alabama.
I think we will be ok, our non-conf SOS is 16th now and we still have Dook yet on the docket. Every power conf team schedules these bottom feeder games.
Zero concerns about SOS - we have 4 wins over Q1 teams already. We are elite and every overall metric shows it. Top ten in the country.I think we will be ok, our non-conf SOS is 16th now and we still have Dook yet on the docket. Every power conf team schedules these bottom feeder games.
I think you’re right and the nice thing about this board is that everyone agreed and there were zero complaints about playing Chicago State.This going to sound kinda weird, but I think playing Chicago State helped in some ways. First, it got some meaningful minutes with some of the bench guys in the early stages of the game so they were playing in rotation and while the team was not just playing out the string. Just seeing the ball go in the basket seemed to help guys like Gibbs-Lawhorn and Davis with their confidence. And the up-tempo pace was a welcome change from the Tenn and Mizzou slogs. Seems to me controlling the pace is a big key going forward. Rebounding and attacking once they break backcourt pressure seems like keys to being able to speed up the game. But most of what I know I probably learned from some on this board...as well as many culinary things
Another thing I love about this board is it has given me even more appreciation for good (by that I mean not mean) sarcasm!I think you’re right and the nice thing about this board is that everyone agreed and there were zero complaints about playing Chicago State.
He finally came around and really elevated us (not that his opinion matters plus he works at espn which we know is an SEC network)
One non-conference strength of schedule is 233rd per KenPom.
Auburn, Duke, and Tennesee have 1 game against 300+.
Alabama played #299 and no teams 300 or worse.
Kansas played #287 and no teams 300 or worse.
Baylor played #296 and 1 team 300 or worse.
Michigan has 0 games against teams 300 or worse.
On the flip side, MSU played 2 and UCLA played 3. Iowa State played 3 (and #289 and #294 as well). I'd say it's a pretty mixed bag, but those games are absolutely dragging down our NCSOS.
Illinois has 3. I really wish we would stop scheduling teams THAT bad and schedule teams in the 150 - 250 range instead (SIU-E, Ark-LR, etc.). I know you can't always predict it, but Chicago State and Maryland-Eastern Shore are pretty regularly below 300.
I think we will be ok, our non-conf SOS is 16th now and we still have Dook yet on the docket. Every power conf team schedules these bottom feeder games.
My guess is the scheduling decisions have been made doing the math about opponent’s rank vs how bad you beat them. Because despite the low strength of schedule, we are highly ranked by the computers. The reason is we have beaten those low ranked teams by very large margins.One non-conference strength of schedule is 233rd per KenPom.
Auburn, Duke, and Tennesee have 1 game against 300+.
Alabama played #299 and no teams 300 or worse.
Kansas played #287 and no teams 300 or worse.
Baylor played #296 and 1 team 300 or worse.
Michigan has 0 games against teams 300 or worse.
On the flip side, MSU played 2 and UCLA played 3. Iowa State played 3 (and #289 and #294 as well). I'd say it's a pretty mixed bag, but those games are absolutely dragging down our NCSOS.
Illinois has 3. I really wish we would stop scheduling teams THAT bad and schedule teams in the 150 - 250 range instead (SIU-E, Ark-LR, etc.). I know you can't always predict it, but Chicago State and Maryland-Eastern Shore are pretty regularly below 300.
My guess is the scheduling decisions have been made doing the math about opponent’s rank vs how bad you beat them. Because despite the low strength of schedule, we are highly ranked by the computers. The reason is we have beaten those low ranked teams by very large margins.
As much as we hear about analytics for Illinois basketball, and the rise in use of computers in tournament seeding, it is likely they are also crunching the numbers about relative merits of playing opponents of various ranks and the margin of victory needed.
My issue is you play enough of those 150 teams and you’re gonna have a bad loss having an off day when the goal of those games is to work on specific things and play a home game in front of fans.One non-conference strength of schedule is 233rd per KenPom.
Auburn, Duke, and Tennesee have 1 game against 300+.
Alabama played #299 and no teams 300 or worse.
Kansas played #287 and no teams 300 or worse.
Baylor played #296 and 1 team 300 or worse.
Michigan has 0 games against teams 300 or worse.
On the flip side, MSU played 2 and UCLA played 3. Iowa State played 3 (and #289 and #294 as well). I'd say it's a pretty mixed bag, but those games are absolutely dragging down our NCSOS.
Illinois has 3. I really wish we would stop scheduling teams THAT bad and schedule teams in the 150 - 250 range instead (SIU-E, Ark-LR, etc.). I know you can't always predict it, but Chicago State and Maryland-Eastern Shore are pretty regularly below 300.
Back when I used to coach (HS/JHS west Texas), I ALWAYS wanted a track meet. I had my guys push and push and push. I had some track stars and it worked quite well. Other teams wanted to slow it down and run patient sets, but I could always get the game speeded up by pressing and over playing. There were times we'd give up easy buckets, but, usually we just kept running.This going to sound kinda weird, but I think playing Chicago State helped in some ways. First, it got some meaningful minutes with some of the bench guys in the early stages of the game so they were playing in rotation and while the team was not just playing out the string. Just seeing the ball go in the basket seemed to help guys like Gibbs-Lawhorn and Davis with their confidence. And the up-tempo pace was a welcome change from the Tenn and Mizzou slogs. Seems to me controlling the pace is a big key going forward. Rebounding and attacking once they break backcourt pressure seems like keys to being able to speed up the game. But most of what I know I probably learned from some on this board...as well as many culinary things
Well deservedwasn't sure where to put this:
Agreed! Brad is just as good at schedule construction as he is roster construction.This going to sound kinda weird, but I think playing Chicago State helped in some ways. First, it got some meaningful minutes with some of the bench guys in the early stages of the game so they were playing in rotation and while the team was not just playing out the string. Just seeing the ball go in the basket seemed to help guys like Gibbs-Lawhorn and Davis with their confidence. And the up-tempo pace was a welcome change from the Tenn and Mizzou slogs. Seems to me controlling the pace is a big key going forward. Rebounding and attacking once they break backcourt pressure seems like keys to being able to speed up the game. But most of what I know I probably learned from some on this board...as well as many culinary things
I was wondering how many of those players were at BYU with Pope that are now at Kentucky. Feel like that should be factored in as a “returning player” for himEvan is going to be tracking roster turnover results throughout year. Apologies if this has been posted/shared already.
![]()
Teams With Roster Turnover Are Struggling In 2024-25
Revisiting modern roster construction strategies to see which approaches are succeeding this seasonblog.evanmiya.com
If we can get DGL 100 minutes a game, we're golden.Evan is going to be tracking roster turnover results throughout year. Apologies if this has been posted/shared already.
![]()
Teams With Roster Turnover Are Struggling In 2024-25
Revisiting modern roster construction strategies to see which approaches are succeeding this seasonblog.evanmiya.com
This is a good read. Very interesting.Evan is going to be tracking roster turnover results throughout year. Apologies if this has been posted/shared already.
![]()
Teams With Roster Turnover Are Struggling In 2024-25
Revisiting modern roster construction strategies to see which approaches are succeeding this seasonblog.evanmiya.com