Easy to nitpick our horrendous zone offense …
They were very impressive together. The chaos and intimidation in the paint they caused was amazing.I liked the twins together. That's when we caught up.
Are you saying that we didnt have trouble with the zone? Brad and every announcer said as much!Not really… far from it actually… 1.29 points per possession today
Shot poorly in the 1st half and shot well in the 2nd half… never any issue getting open looks, it just looks better when they go in is all
The efficiency today would be good enough for #1 nationally, here are the current season long points/possession rankings:
View attachment 46616
Are you saying that we didnt have trouble with the zone? Brad and every announcer said as much!
Are you saying that we didnt have trouble with the zone? Brad and every announcer said as much!
Not really… far from it actually… 1.29 points per possession today
The efficiency today would be good enough for #1 nationally
That's actually kinda crazy. I think there's just a mental block anytime i watch a zone. Feels like the game is just so mucked up and it never looks pretty.
I just have zero clue what a hook and hold is, so what do we think of the no hook & hold this time on Wagler?
Man I totally agree, anytime there’s a zone it’s just watching 2-3 guys out top hold the ball above their heads and play catch for as long as it takes to probe and get it in the middle or the baseline. Which is how you attack it, but it just doesn’t make for great television when it looks like a 1930s game. Someone about to shoot a granny shot lol.
I thought the same thing as I was watching them.USC played bad — 3/20 from deep, 5/14 on FT, so many dumb possessions. And they still had Purdue on the ropes with a chance to win it with a last possession (awful turnover).
Purdue’s last 4 games: 8pt home win against Washington, 8pt home win against Penn State, 7pt home win against Iowa, almost lost to USC today in an ugly, ugly performance.
This thread would be on fire if we had that stretch.
Which site is this?Not really… far from it actually… 1.29 points per possession today
Shot poorly in the 1st half and shot well in the 2nd half… never any issue getting open looks, it just looks better when they go in is all
The efficiency today would be good enough for #1 nationally, here are the current season long points/possession rankings:
View attachment 46616
What's hilarious to me is that the "our offense is bad, we had an awful game" people that show up here for every game, can quite literally never support their stance with anything other than ragebait, doom and gloom.... and then when rational posters (like this post) bring up the facts and reason, reality is literally the polar opposite lol.Not really… far from it actually… 1.29 points per possession today
Shot poorly in the 1st half and shot well in the 2nd half… never any issue getting open looks, it just looks better when they go in is all
The efficiency today would be good enough for #1 nationally, here are the current season long points/possession rankings:
View attachment 46616
It's the "wide open 3s" that kill me.Ben is 27% from 3 in the 17 games since the first game of the season vs. Jackson State (went 5-9 that game). As much flak as he got last season shooting from distance, he's even worse this season. I think we've got far enough evidence at this level (53 games) to say he's a below average 3 point shooter.
Kudos to Brad for icing him today. Theoretically this was a good matchup for Ben vs. zone. Loved Brad giving twin towers some run together.
It's just unacceptable to shoot that % when you're brought in as a shooter and hitting that putrid clip on wide open looks. The % of his looks that are uncontested is very large. Frankly I've grown long long tired of him launching 3s 5-6 foot behind the 3 line. There's absolutely zero reason he should be setting up that far out. Happens over and over and over again. There's where I see the difference between him and Jake. Jake isn't setting up that far beyond the 3 line. Ben's made strides defensively. Just not an upgrade on other options on that end either.
I'm just thankful Ben's not being relied on as a starter at any point this season. We hit a home run with big Z. Such a game changer defensively with a great offensive game today as well
Mirkovic has poor ball security and struggles playing through contact. He does a ton well (and I need to remind myself what a normal freshman looks like), but his weaknesses often lead to empty possessions.
For me it's because we seem to default to Wagler taking a contested 3.That's actually kinda crazy. I think there's just a mental block anytime i watch a zone. Feels like the game is just so mucked up and it never looks pretty.
Look who is third on that list. The Akron Zips. Coached by former Illinois Coach - wait for it - John Groce. We knew he would be a great coach, he just needed time!Not really… far from it actually… 1.29 points per possession today
Shot poorly in the 1st half and shot well in the 2nd half… never any issue getting open looks, it just looks better when they go in is all
The efficiency today would be good enough for #1 nationally, here are the current season long points/possession rankings:
View attachment 46616
Oh noLook who is third on that list. The Akron Zips. Coached by former Illinois Coach - wait for it - John Groce. We knew he would be a great coach, he just needed time!
Good coach, good guy, could not keep up with B1G recruiting.Look who is third on that list. The Akron Zips. Coached by former Illinois Coach - wait for it - John Groce. We knew he would be a great coach, he just needed time!
Good coach in the MAC, good guy, could not keep up with B1G recruiting.
His teammates doused him with water in the locker room. They probably would not have done this if he were injured.Brad dodged the Andrej injury question in the press conference. Usually if an injury's nothing he'd say it.