Wide left, please!
I don't get how you dislike it. Each team gets a possession in OT, unless a defensive TD or safety happens. It's actually the most fair way to do it.I just hate the next score wins rule here.
Rams had first possession, no score.
Bears had first possession, no score.
Rams get second possession, next score wins??
We're still playing the coin toss. That's ridiculous.
Why defer the coin toss?
Each team should get an equal number of possessions.I don't get how you dislike it. Each team gets a possession in OT, unless a defensive TD or safety happens. It's actually the most fair way to do it.
Each team should get an equal number of possessions.
Each team gets one possession: no score.
Then each team should get a second possession. Not just the team that had the first possession.
It's better than it used to be, but we're still giving the advantage to the team who receives the kickoff (after the coin toss).
That cost them a football game. Wondering how much the media decides to run with it. He quit on routes last year.As a neutral:
-In a game of this weather, you have to take the points. Ben Johnson should’ve kicked at least one of the field goals in the first half.
-DJ Moore quit on that route and then quit again not trying to prevent the INT
-Caleb is electric
-I was rooting hard for the Bears on behalf of my Illini fans and extended family, bummed for all you guys and gals!
Good point, and that's certainly the logic behind the rules.The first possession for each is an equal number of possessions. You'll get games pointlessly dragging on if you go further than that with each team getting the same. This isn't like baseball. The Bills are the main reason that we don't get an immediate walk-off TD on the first possession in the playoffs like we used to.