UCLA 95, Illinois 94 OT Postgame

Status
Not open for further replies.
#354      
USC Thread: 9 pages total

UCLA Thread: 9 pages in the first 30 minutes

I’m sure this thread is full of level headed individuals with reasonable takes.
Username checks out. "Oh no, he did the right thing, nobody should criticize"
 
#355      
Tonight really was the case of complacency on defense helping the other team find their groove. Once it became a game and the team locked back in, the legs were just not there.

Not going to be upset if we respond strong in the last 3. Learning moment for when it matters, just like every loss.
 
#356      
Sad Happy Hour GIF
 
#357      
This will certainly be an historical and epic loss that will rate top five in Illini hoops history. As much as I dislike Cronin, I must give a tip of my hat to the Bruins players (all except Bil-a-dough the dirtbag) who did not quit and played a pretty smart game the last 35 min. When you get down 33-10, that is tough to do.

My hope is that our guys learned a lesson about playing 40 min. of focused and energetic defense.

This was always possible when playing a team of shorter, quicker kids that can hit shots seemingly all night....a task of which they have proven before tonight that they are capable. I was leery of that happening and stated so in the pre-game thread....only to watch it come true. But it was only three seasons ago that we watched Terrance and gang do the same to the Bruins....so I guess it just makes me appreciated the fickleness of the game even more.

Regardless, a tip of my hat to Hummer and Wags for their efforts during the entire game. Poor Keaton sure takes a beating with little to show for it and is maybe the only B1G superstar that does so. What a great kid and player. And Ben was tremendous tonight in so many ways. Keep it up old man!!! (He is 48 years old isn't he....and still playing college ball with kids?) He could make a living with his MD degree doing heart surgery on Loyalty game thread posters.
 
#358      
I really hope that if we get in that spot again we put someone on the inbounds passer.
As someone pointed out earlier in the thread, they could run the baseline on that inbounds so putting (and keeping) someone on the passer would have been tough and that player would be useless on D after that
 
#361      
I mean, the last second shot sucks because that's a really difficult position for a defense to be in. You can't foul there because the only thing worse than losing on a last second shot is losing by a free throw with time expired. But this game was lost when we didn't step on their throats in the first half.
 
#362      
Championship teams win these games. There are no banners for Kenpom metrics.
Thank Thank You Thank You . This the best comment on this Board Tired of the KenPom
metrics fanboys Total bullcrap loss I’m pissed
 
#363      
What’s your reasonable take on what just happened?
Posted the full one separately but basically complacent defense let them get going and then didn’t have the legs to make the plays down the stretch.

Put it in the rearview and go give Michigan everything.
 
#365      
Wagler with 19pts, 8reb, 6ast, and 8/8 on FTs. He had 6 (SIX!) offensive rebounds.
When Mirk, Tomi, Andre and Keaton go 2 of 18 from 3 then maybe drive the ball instead of taking a 28 footer up 1 early in the clock. I know Keaton has some huge shots and Andre has shot it better lately. Late in the clock fine but not early in that spot when we are getting to the line. Keaton and Sndre were doing great getting to the line and i wish i had seem more from them and Boz
 
#366      
Wagler with 19pts, 8reb, 6ast, and 8/8 on FTs. He had 6 (SIX!) offensive rebounds.
5 of 15 overall shooting and 1 of 6 from three. 19 points on 15 shots is wildly inefficient and can't happen.

His turnover right before the end of the first half can't happen either. That whole play was a mess.

However, he did other things well, as you noted.

There were a lot of issues tonight over the last 29 minutes. If there was a true player of the game for the losing side, it would have been Ben H.
 
#368      
How much does putting the clock all the way at 4.9 impact that? Way too much time.
If somebody would have tried to stop the ball or stand in the way of the runner the time would not have mattered they would have been forced to shoot from at least three point range.. and they probably would have missed and we would have won but nobody stopped the guy with the ball and I don't know why I mean it's confounding to me.
 
#370      
I think everyone could agree, we didn't shoot nearly as well as we typically do.
I think everyone could agree, UCLA went on an incredible shooting stretch over about 18 minutes (regardless of what the defense was.)
Hopefully everyone can take a step back and be thrilled, WE ARE THE TEAM that just got upset after that happened and are clearly ready to be one of approximately 14 or less teams who have a true Final 4 chance.

UCLA on the other hand, just pulled off the upset they HAD to have to get into the dance. That used to be us, we would be the team who desperately needed that win to get in!

We're fine, love this team, love this coaching staff!

ILL!!
 
#371      
Yeah Wagler was especially off from 3 compared to what we are used to. Maybe he does have tired legs after all.
Anyway six days off to recover then beat meatchicken and the rest of the regular season games we have left and we are in good shape
I don't want to spoil anything for you but Michigan is going to destroy us.
 
#372      
Lots of champions have lost games like this in the regular season.
Brad ain’t winning !!!! at the end of the year. I was buying the hype but tonight reminds me the turd he is in late game situations. Time after time after time. Sweet 16 max.
 
#373      
Man, it's telling how many posters have been aching to rag on the coaching and the metrics, just waiting for the chance. 9 pages in 30 minutes, many posters who have been quiet for the entire year.
People LOVE to be mad. It’s the human condition.
 
#374      
Man, it's telling how many posters have been aching to rag on the coaching and the metrics, just waiting for the chance. 9 pages in 30 minutes, many posters who have been quiet for the entire year.
It's almost like we're happy to watch and enjoy until it all goes to !!!! the exact same way again. That's not "aching to rag"; that's hoping for the best, being proven wrong every single year, and running out of patience.
 
#375      
This was my issue with it. 4.9 seconds is WAY too much time when you're giving a clear path to inbound the ball. There was clearly a fear of fouling and rightfully so.
A tipped ball wins the game. Thats a good reason to do so.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back