Bingo. I said something similar to this in the game thread. There is definitely a difference in half court offensive philosophies. You cannot discount the wear and tear on the Illinois players having to fight through the multiple picks on each defensive possession for 40 minutes.
(1) We didn't play man the entire game
(2) UCONN only ran the staggered screen (Bruce Webber motion) offense for 4 players. Roughly 50% of the remainder of the plays were "Hi - Lo" and they even talked about it on the broadcast.
(3) Running that action in 2004 - 2005 far more often than UCONN ran it last night, didn't seem tire anyone out 20 years ago.
(4) If anything it takes equal the amount of energy to run a complete circle (running your defender) and through 2 screens as it does to defend it.
(5) Jake, Hummer and Mirk (nor for that matter Boz or Keaton) weren't by any means exhausted after the game.
Finally, you play with got you to the Final 4. Not to some "half court philosophy." That means that you play to your team's strength in our case being:
(1) A combination of straight MTM with doubles in the post and zone defensively.
(2) The spread offense, and our success in the tournament was in no way predicated or determined by shooting 3pt shots. In fact we averaged less than 25 3pt shots a game in the tournament, vs 32 in the regular season. We were 3-17 from three point range against Iowa and 9-23 from three point range against Houston. This "Offensive Philosophy" argument is coming from someone who is not an avid Illinois watcher.
(3) The offense and defense we ran in 2025 - 26 was based solely on the roster, rebounding and defense. Nothing else. Only last night we missed 8 tip ins or lay ups.
We were 13-30 from 2pt range against UCONN - we normally shoot 58% from 2 pt range. That and the FTs were the difference in the game. Nothing else.
(4) Our offense is predicated on match - ups (and creating match ups) and nothing else.