College Sports (Basketball)

Status
Not open for further replies.
#51      
HereSoIDontGetFined
Illini2010-11 said:
I am sure that is going to be challenged successfully. I am thinking immediately of a scenario of a student athlete who was in the military and is in mid-20s at time of entry into school.

These one size fits all approaches are silly, imo.
Click to expand...
Except there's plenty of precedent for having leagues restricted by age. Happens all over youth sports.
 
#53      
Illini2010-11
HereSoIDontGetFined said:
Except there's plenty of precedent for having leagues restricted by age. Happens all over youth sports.
Click to expand...
Key word there...youth. Those age restrictions are generally about competitive balance, and physical size diffentials based on age. Of course you don't want a 16 year old playing in a basketball league with a group of 8 year olds...

College itself is also not bound to a certain age group. The precedent that you are citing will be legally very dubious.
 
#54      
CoalCity
Illini2010-11 said:
I am sure that is going to be challenged successfully. I am thinking immediately of a scenario of a student athlete who was in the military and is in mid-20s at time of entry into school.

These one size fits all approaches are silly, imo.
Click to expand...
There are provisions for military service and religious missions.
 
#55      
Illini2010-11
CoalCity said:
There are provisions for military service and religious missions.
Click to expand...
That was not spelled out in the article. But even if you take out military service or religious missions (assuming that the provisions will stand in the policy), there are individuals (those who start college a bit later in life) who could be theoretically impacted by this ruling. I find it silly policy to restrict an individual who possibly did not start college until 24 (for whatever reason) to not be allowed to partake in college athletics. Sure these are limited amounts of individuals who fit this criteria, but making NCAA age-based specific when undergraduate college itself is not age-based, seems a bit far-fetched to me.
 
#56      
TheodoreRex
Would BAM be able to play 1 more year according to the potential changes the NCAA is contemplating?
 
#57      
floorburn
If approved, how would it affect someone like Will Holmes, who spent 3 years pitching in the minors for the Los Angeles Angels, from 2018-21? He’s currently 25 years old.
 
#58      
CoalCity
Illini2010-11 said:
That was not spelled out in the article. But even if you take out military service or religious missions (assuming that the provisions will stand in the policy), there are individuals (those who start college a bit later in life) who could be theoretically impacted by this ruling. I find it silly policy to restrict an individual who possibly did not start college until 24 (for whatever reason) to not be allowed to partake in college athletics. Sure these are limited amounts of individuals who fit this criteria, but making NCAA age-based specific when undergraduate college itself is not age-based, seems a bit far-fetched to me.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure "limited" describes that subset of college athletes. Maybe "miniscule".
 
#59      
.243 Remington
The NCAA must think that Illinois got a little too close to the national title for comfort!
Gotta put an end to Underwood's scheme of recruiting over seas. :oops:

How about this? Once you commit to a school you have to stay at least 3 years, unless the head coach gets fired. No more paying them to play, PERIOD! Once they earn money to play, they ARE professionals. (The very definition of professional athlete: Being paid to play a sport/game.) If student athletes want to sell their name and image however, that's awesome! Go for it. Got no problem with that.

It would end coaches having to completely rebuild teams every single year.
It would also eliminate schools with more money buying national titles.
The NCAA is made up of idiots with absolutely no common sense. Should be done away with.
 
#61      
alaskaillini
From the cheap seats said:
I respect everyone's opinions; mine is that the watering-down is a non-issue, especially as the tourney progresses. Since 1985, when the tourney expanded to 64 teams, the 16 seeds have a record of 2-160 (UMBC over Virginia in 2018 and Farleigh Dickinson over Purdue in 2023, which is perhaps the best argument for expansion, a chance to see an even lower-ranked team beat Purdue :)).
Click to expand...
There is always a silver lining.
 
#62      
Epsilon
Wasn’t sure where to post this, but it looks like the B1G earned just under $70m for the men’s and women’s basketball tournaments this year, while our men team alone earned $10.4m for making it to the final four. Of course all the money gets paid to the B1G and all the spoils for every team are divided, but apparently we’ll get paid in “units” over the course of the next 6 years for the B1G’s success. Details in the linked article.

www.espn.com

Big Ten earns $69.4M in revenue from NCAA basketball tournaments

The Big Ten amassed $69.4 million from NCAA distributions that will be paid for appearances and performances in the 2026 men's and women's basketball tournaments.
www.espn.com www.espn.com
 
#63      
80'sIllini
Illini2010-11 said:
Speaking of, can't see that tourney surviving. Mediocre teams playing in a tourney the week of the Final Four. You know it is bad when they have to get all the way down to Rutgers at 14-19 to fill out an 8 team field.
Click to expand...
I was at the FF4 weekend this year and on Sunday before the championship game my friends and I watched the NIT championship game which was held at the stadium where the Pacers play. The place was empty except for the satanical Bruce Pearl and his buddy Barkley. Must have been < than 2000 people in attendance.
 
#68      
Vinegarben
This is a stupid idea. You want to expand the tourney so you can get a sub 500 team like Auburn or an Indiana in. After playing 18 conference games and you finish 11th there is no way in hell you should be in a tourney. It's all about more money. I don't even watch the play-in games, what would be the incentive for me to watch 8 more bottom dwellers play. Leave the game alone please! They should make sure NO team plays at home like Houston in Houston, Duke and North Carolina in Greensborough. Quit giving bluebloods every easy path to the final four. A real champion should demonstrate they can play with or beat any top team.
 
#71      
BrimfieldBomber
Mentioned in the Football thread, but Wisconsin AD Chris McIntosh is leaving the University for an unnamed position with the B1G Office.

Gard watch next year.
 
#72      
spotter
Joel Goodson said:
I don't know about that. Larry Sclerosis, high knees and TV Ted say "hold my beer"...but DJ bald head belongs in that exclusive group. good riddance!
Click to expand...
Yeah, but TV Ted went bonkers with Bobby Knight in 1998 when the Illini were at IU, giving him three technicals and tossing him causing a near riot. So, he's good in my book! (ducks head)

www.si.com

Referee Ted Valentine Recounts Famous Moments with Bob Knight

NCAA referee Ted Valentine retold the story of when he gave former Indiana coach Bob Knight three technical fouls in 1998.
www.si.com www.si.com
 
#73      
Grandpa
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back