Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#801      
I have a hot take that's been hinted at, but I don't think specifically stated here.

The prevailing narrative, based on the timing of the media reporting, is that Blackwell backed away from ILL upon the return of AS.

My speculation based, outsider hot-take is that Coleman's camp was signaling to ILL staff that he would pivot elsewhere if Blackwell was signed. And the ILL chose Coleman.

If any insider wants to humiliated me based on these wretched thoughts, I can handle the abuse.

View attachment 50019
seth meyers GIF by Late Night with Seth Meyers
 
#807      
I LOVE this freshmen class! If they stick together and we add a couple of bigs next year (transfers or recruits,) They will be dynamite. Great shooters, assisters, positional size, they have all the earmarks of a top-notch Illini team. I'm sure we will see great contributions from most if not all of them this year. Our coach is not afraid to play freshmen, if they're willing to play defense and rebound,

They are the product of a final four year...
 
#808      
Also discounting Ethan Brown and Zavier Zens, who I assume the staff quite likes.

I mean, if you consider last year's team 10 deep including Lee and Petrovic, then you have to also consider this year's team the same way.
Actually, it was Ty and Petrovic. Just had an unexpected injury (in the summer).

Petro turned out a bust, but we went into the year 9-10 deep.
 
Last edited:
#809      
Florida and Duke already say hello
Duke is extremely thin down low though. I'm not sold on them yet. We have more depth in the frontcourt and we have people panicking about another 4, which I actually agree with. They're gonna be vulnerable if they don't keep adding.
Florida however, clear cut favorite and they'll probably get their other big back too on top of Haugh. Its why we can't get comfortable where we are.
 
#811      
If Illinois had continued to push hard for John Blackwell while the portal was open and a key recruit was unsigned, neither Andrej Stojakovic nor Quentin Coleman would be on this team.

Have a great offseason.
this is the clarity the board needed. if that's the trade (stojakavic + qc) vs Blackwell. then I'm happy with that trade. rather keep our players who went to final four and were studs in the tournament. also I like 5 stars
 
#812      
Nope. Vaaks is lead guard.
Do we even know what a point guard is in today's day in age? I would say Jeremy Fears type, but not too many like that anymore.

The way offenses rely soo much on pick and rolls instead of actual plays, I think a point guard just needs to be a creator and decision maker. Coleman won't be the guy right away in crunch time, but anybody who watched him play knows he will be one of our lead guards and most likely penciled in at the one. He doesn't have the type of passive mentality that an Adam Miller or Skyy Clark has that limited their potential. He's a straight dawg, and he won't be shy. Its a good problem to have.
 
#813      
I hate to break it to people, but most college kids do not care all that much about winning a college national championship. They care about money and setting up their career.

In our current situation, the $$ isn't the issue. Selling an experienced player with 1 maybe 2 years of eligibility on a reduced role for a loaded team in most cases is not what is best for their career. Everyone keeps referencing Hummer but seem to ignore the fact that he came here as a junior with expectations to start and carry a scoring load.
Honest question: how do you think other stacked teams (not just/necessarily this offseason) have done it? Lied and made false promises? Offered ridiculous amounts of money? Are more desirable for some other reason (prestige, connections, etc)?
 
#814      
People in here need to understand that the talent across college basketball next year is not going to be the same as this year. There is not going to be an Arizona or Michigan like superteam, the transfers aren't as good overall, and the recruits aren't as high end compared to last year in terms of the elites.

Illinois has one of the four or five best rosters is the country. Could they push and add another stud? Sure, but it's not that easy. There are agents and other factors involved with that. I still stand by my thinking that they add someone over the next few months.

There are a ton of teams that have half a roster filled out with not a lot of options left, including blue bloods. It's okay to want more, but we are set to contend for a national championship next year. Have some faith in the evaluations that the staff made in Coleman and Morillo.
It is also understandable why the staff is choosing to wait. There are only a few impact guys left in the portal. You have to imagine the bidding right now is getting absurd as other teams begin to panic because they don't have 8 guys they really like.

Even when it comes to guys we may hope to target, due to the overall lack of difference makers, they are probably being over pursued at present.
There is a lot of parity among guys who remain out there. Once some of the panic bidding calms down, there will likely be some decent guys who haven't found a home yet.

Once the musical chairs start to fill up, we will likely find a guy or two who fit our needs and are more ready to accept a role. No one wants to be left standing when the music stops.
 
#816      
1. We have no clue who the PG is going to be, others on different boards think it will be Coleman.
2. If Vaaks doesn’t workout at point, Coleman or Morillo will be the guy.
3. Coleman will more than likely be the backup point.

Back to the original post, McCoy will be in none of those positions for Michigan. Hope this helps
I think we're overrating the "point guard" and "lead ballhandler" roles. Our offense runs like NBA, so the bigger question is who initiates the offense. That will be Vaaks, Mirk, Stoj, Coleman, or anyone else for that matter, based on matchups. Defined roles are fluid, which makes us more dangerous
 
#817      
If Illinois had continued to push hard for John Blackwell while the portal was open and a key recruit was unsigned, neither Andrej Stojakovic nor Quentin Coleman would be on this team.

Have a great offseason.
Program is going in the right direction but still a lot of room for growth. Hard to compete yearly for championships if we can only max out at 1 top recruit per team before they bolt.
 
#818      
This is one of the most confident incorrect posts I’ve seen on this board. Vaaks will be our lead guard. The staff sees Vaaks as the Keaton replacement. So no, Coleman will not be asked to be our pg from the jump or be a lead guard in crunch time.
One the one hand: agreed, this is the correct read of the situation.

On the other hand, the correctly analyzed primary ballhandler/offense initiator on May 1 of the offseason:

2022-23: Skyy Clark
2023-24: RayJ Dennis
2024-25: Kylan Boswell
2025-26: Mihailo Petrovic

The ACTUAL primary ballhandler/offense initiator come the heat of conference season

2022-23: Epps/Mayer
2023-24: Marcus Domask
2024-25: Kasparas Jakucionis
2025-26: Keaton Wagler
 
#819      
Honest question: how do you think other stacked teams (not just/necessarily this offseason) have done it? Lied and made false promises? Offered ridiculous amounts of money? Are more desirable for some other reason (prestige, connections, etc)?

What other teams have done this? We're one of the very few teams in the portal era to return almost all of our core players from a Final 4 roster. It's much easier to sell an experienced player on coming to a team and earning his minutes when the entire roster is new.
 
#821      
One the one hand: agreed, this is the correct read of the situation.

On the other hand, the correctly analyzed primary ballhandler/offense initiator on May 1 of the offseason:

2022-23: Skyy Clark
2023-24: RayJ Dennis
2024-25: Kylan Boswell
2025-26: Mihailo Petrovic

The ACTUAL primary ballhandler/offense initiator come the heat of conference season

2022-23: Epps/Mayer
2023-24: Marcus Domask
2024-25: Kasparas Jakucionis
2025-26: Keaton Wagler

So the primary ballhandler has ended up being a taller, non-traditional point guard that can get their own buckets. Which is exactly what Vaaks looks to be.. So you could argue that Brad is just cutting out the wasted time on trying to fit a true point guard into his system.

Edit: I didn't even notice RayJ at first. IDK if a joke but it made me chuckle.
 
Last edited:
#822      
This is a great time of the year to see how our team unfolds but holy Sh*t people you need help !

I would definately hate to be an insider here and bring some really good news and have a bunch of morons crucify the news.

If you cant see how ELITE this team can be next year maybe you should switch to needlepoint .
Fed Up Whatever GIF by Brabant in Beelden

I want more elite sonny
 
#824      
One the one hand: agreed, this is the correct read of the situation.

On the other hand, the correctly analyzed primary ballhandler/offense initiator on May 1 of the offseason:

2022-23: Skyy Clark
2023-24: RayJ Dennis
2024-25: Kylan Boswell
2025-26: Mihailo Petrovic

The ACTUAL primary ballhandler/offense initiator come the heat of conference season

2022-23: Epps/Mayer
2023-24: Marcus Domask
2024-25: Kasparas Jakucionis
2025-26: Keaton Wagler
And 2022 was Andre Curbelo... who looked a shell of himself for most of the year due to concussions.
 
#825      
Honest question: how do you think other stacked teams (not just/necessarily this offseason) have done it? Lied and made false promises? Offered ridiculous amounts of money? Are more desirable for some other reason (prestige, connections, etc)?
There's a video floating around from some years back. I believe it was high school but maybe a small college and it went something like this.

A bunch of recruiters spoke about why students should join their specific branch of the military; free education, easy path to skills, etc.

Then a marine recruiter got up and basically said a bunch of reasons you shouldn't join the marines; harder, you may be asked to die, worse pay and conditions, etc.

When all was said and done the Marines had a long recruiting line and the others didn't. I think Brad not promising playing time is a good policy. Its probably also easier to recruit the marine type attitude right out of high school than transfer portal guys. We need to keep improving our prep recruiting. Transfer guys have already preselected themselves to be either money or playing time chasers instead of winning team chasers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back