Spot of shooting 11 of 25? Not ideal.
Spot of shooting 11 of 25? Not ideal.
Still gonna be top 10 or better.Spot of shooting 11 of 25? Not ideal.
It only matters in gamesSpot of shooting 11 of 25? Not ideal.
Was 41% on the year on catch and shoot threes.It only matters in games
zombies and asteroids, man
i am biased and want wagler but not at 4. trading up 15 and players, future picks would be best but i would also consider trade down to 5-7 if boozer is left at 4. good gms will downgrade picks and get treasure heist sort of like fultz for tatum. boozer was the best college player but wagler will be the better pro. boozer just had ridiculous combine so hes like easily worth number 1 in other draft sell him super high you could get something like wagler plus top 10 talent back.Pretty much what I was thinking. Guess there’s always a remote chance given Wagler is “qualified” and has Illini ties, but it does feel like the top 4 are locked in except for the specific order.
And the Yellowstone Super Volcano.zombies and asteroids, man
The combine is solid for measurables, but otherwise is mostly performative. 30 shots is about 970 shots short of being useful to measure shooting ability.Still gonna be top 10 or better.
I’m waiting for the post-game win Volcano GIF to make an appearance after this post.And the Yellowstone Super Volcano.
Tidbit from a scout I know.The combine is solid for measurables, but otherwise is mostly performative. 30 shots is about 970 shots short of being useful to measure shooting ability.