Coaching Carousel (Basketball)

#226      
I don’t think it’s gutsy because of the paragraph you said above, he could get just about any job he wants in college…like Kentucky next year if he flames out.

Are the buy-outs in the NBA fully guaranteed? Crazy to think he could take a job at $15 mil a year with a good buy-out, fail, take the buy-out, and then fall back to what, $8-10 mil at another college?
 
#227      
He had a great thing going at Michigan and could have settled in there and won for a decade. He had money to play with, he got whatever kids he wanted, the compensation was pretty outstanding and after winning a national championship, he probably had a lifetime contract lined up.

The NBA is a whole different ordeal. I don't think that you have to be a great X's and O's guy and you definitely can't have an overwhelming personality. In college, if players are unhappy, they transfer. In the NBA, if players are unhappy, you're fired and black balled.

All that said, his value will never be higher than it is right now and the good news for him is that if he fails miserably, getting back to a top tier college job, a year after being an analyst on CBS or ESPN.....he won't have to look hard.

Gutsy move and only time will tell if it was the right decision.
College coaches are definitely making a ton of money but NBA money can be a different level if the owners want to spend it on a coach. May was on 5 for 25 million before the championship and likely got a raise(or would have).

I think Self is still the highest paid college coach at like 9 million. Steve Kerr is making nearly double that. The Mavs could have pretty easily doubled or tripled what he was making at Michigan(they could afford to pay him 30 mil a season if they wanted to) and I would guess that he has 4-5 years of runway at a minimum.

Also, college sports are in a weird spot and you have to recruit year round including rerecruit your own roster to stay. High school commits also mean less than ever since they can jump ship at the last minute if they their assumed role shrink from portal adds or retention. It's a very weird juggling act of trying to build as talented of a roster as possible while keeping everyone happy.

On a different note, I just think that this is a different generation of coaches and with how big the money has gotten that we will see a lot of guys retire earlier and not see as many guys coaching into their late 60s or even 70s. I expect to see a lot more guys follow the Jay Wright path and retire around 60(it's the NBA but I expect Kerr to retire soon).

May is 49(about to be 50). A lifetime contract is not much different from a 5 year one from Dallas if youre planning to retire at 60 and he is probably making the same amount in 5 years that he would in 10 at Michigan. I think this applies to a lot of sports but I genuinely don't see a guy like Scheyer coaching until he's in his 70s.
 
#229      
All of the B1G coaches, including Brad, are revoltingly reverential to Izzo. As are all the reporters.

Izzo is a great coach without question, but Nick Saban accomplished twice as much and was still well understood to be a miserable curmudgeon. Why Izzo gets to the Mayor of Basketballtown is beyond me.
Nothing seems to stick to Michigan State. Scandal after scandal and it all washes away rather quickly.
 
#231      
tough for UM. also, man did IU miss out on their potential golden goose. love pointing that out again
I suppose. But don't you suppose that IU fans are thinking that May would have left them so he was only a short term solution? Of course, if that's their first title in 40 years, well worth it. But that's not likely.

The question is whether a top 10 finish with an elite 8 or FF finish by IU, with May at the helm, would have been enough to send May to the NBA.
 
#234      
Hopefully a team with a need and a vengeful donor takes Fichigan's most irreplaceable player, whatever it costs.
 
#235      
I think you've gotta be a pretty good strategist/game manager/X and Os guy, which is what helps keep the players happy.
The connection between those two things is an excellent point.

Also, I get that we're on a college sports board, but the constant state of shock that a basketball professional would eagerly pursue the chance to work at the highest level of basketball in the world is kind of silly.
True, but there's just something kind of irrelevant about NBA coaches these days. It's such a same-y, player-directed style of play now.

Mike Malone, Joe Mazzula, Mark Daigneault and Mike Brown are your last four NBA Champion coaches. None of those guys are meaningful figures in the game the way, say, Dan Hurley is.
 
#236      
We are lucky that - despite protests from Indiana and UCLA fans - we don't have some program within the Big Ten that just exists in a stratosphere way above the rest of us.

I’m gonna push back on this thought.. I don’t think conference affiliation has anything to do with coach poaching. It doesn’t matter that there is no Duke in the Big Ten. Duke still exists and they can come take our coach if they wanted. It happened with Self and Kansas.
 
#237      
Man, I almost come close to feeling a little bit bad for Michigan fans. It must be a crazy feeling to have the Petyr Baelish of college basketball (for you Game of Thrones fans) come in, recruit a team of mercenaries, win a National Championship, and disappear into the night all in the span of 2 seasons. It's like marrying the most beautiful woman in the world, just to come home from a work trip and find out she left you for some millionaire after 6 months. At least she left the house and the dog (for now).

I'm not sure how exactly people are defending him considering this, I don't know how you would trust anyone anymore as a fan. Their entire fandom has to feel like they're living through the curse of the monkey paw, especially after the Sherrone Moore fiasco shortly after a National Championship.

All I can say is that my faith in the universe would be restored if the last B1G team to win a National Championship was Illinois and Brad Underwood after 10 seasons rebuilding the program to national prominence and returning a bunch of vets, instead of a band of fickle (but also very, very good) mercenaries.
 
#238      
The connection between those two things is an excellent point.


True, but there's just something kind of irrelevant about NBA coaches these days. It's such a same-y, player-directed style of play now.

Mike Malone, Joe Mazzula, Mark Daigneault and Mike Brown are your last four NBA Champion coaches. None of those guys are meaningful figures in the game the way, say, Dan Hurley is.
I think that's just the nature of the pro game.

College sports gave always had revolving rosters so the consistent top tier programs were always led by a coach that is kind of the figurehead of the program.

Phil Jackson won 11 championships and he is not nearly as revered as long time successful college coaches. When you think of those teams it's Michael and Scottie, or Kobe and Shaq/Pau. Honestly I feel like you hear more about guys like Rodman, Grant, Kukoc, Fisher, and Horry than Phil.

Kind of the same thing with Popovic. Duncan, Robinson, Manu, and Parker are the first thing that comes up.

Mike malone won a title and was out of a job 2 years later. The NBA is just a much more player/star driven game.
 
#239      
Lol.

On a more serious and off-topic note, I think it definitely helps us that historically there really hasn't been this "can't-say-no" job in the Big Ten like a Duke / North Carolina in the ACC or how OSU / Michigan function on the football side of things for us. I know that will bruise the ego of Indiana historically and even UCLA now, but there are a lot of good basketball jobs in the Big Ten, and I feel like the gap between them is small enough that schools will always stand a good chance of keeping their coach.

For example, Indiana routinely ranks above Illinois and Michigan State on job rankings that I see, but ... whatever perceived gap there is seems pretty small to me. If Illinois and MSU enjoy "worse resources" in some way, it is to a small enough degree that Indiana would likely have a difficult time pulling off that poach. Compare that to some younger, Dusty-May-esque coach who goes to Virginia and has them rolling ... if Duke comes calling with a blank check, I think it'd be hard for many in that situation to say no.

TL;DR

We are lucky that - despite protests from Indiana and UCLA fans - we don't have some program within the Big Ten that just exists in a stratosphere way above the rest of us.

I’d also say in this climate the amount of can’t say no jobs is shrinking across the board.

I know I’ve beat a dead horse on this point mostly in relation to prior instances of fans wanting to move on from Brad for greener pastures. But…

Lville getting Pat Kelsey
Unc getting Mike malone
Indiana getting Darren Devries
Ohio State getting Diebler
Kentucky getting mark pope.

I think we’re past the days of even all blue bloods picking whoever they want.
 
#240      
Phil Jackson won 11 championships and he is not nearly as revered as long time successful college coaches. When you think of those teams it's Michael and Scottie, or Kobe and Shaq/Pau. Honestly I feel like you hear more about guys like Rodman, Grant, Kukoc, Fisher, and Horry than Phil.

Kind of the same thing with Popovic. Duncan, Robinson, Manu, and Parker are the first thing that comes up.
Phil and Pop are giants of the game.

The NBA hasn't created a new figure like that since Steve Kerr.
 
#242      
I’m gonna push back on this thought.. I don’t think conference affiliation has anything to do with coach poaching. It doesn’t matter that there is no Duke in the Big Ten. Duke still exists and they can come take our coach if they wanted. It happened with Self and Kansas.
I mean putting aside the fact that I don’t agree that Duke could just poach a coach from us NO MATTER WHAT (UNC just failed to poach Lloyd from a similar status program in Arizona), I wasn’t trying to say conference affiliation was a factor by itself. What I meant is that it would probably sting more to lose a coach to a conference rival than it would somewhere like Duke, so it’s good for us no such jobs exist in our conference.
 
#243      
...
On a different note, I just think that this is a different generation of coaches and with how big the money has gotten that we will see a lot of guys retire earlier and not see as many guys coaching into their late 60s or even 70s. I expect to see a lot more guys follow the Jay Wright path and retire around 60(it's the NBA but I expect Kerr to retire soon).
...
I expect this two year contract is Kerr's last. I only expect him to do the second year if they get to at least the conference finals this year and decide to try one more year with Curry and Green (who are on expiring contracts this year). Watch out for a do or die trade moving Butler for someone who fits better in the next few weeks.
 
#244      
I mean putting aside the fact that I don’t agree that Duke could just poach a coach from us NO MATTER WHAT (UNC just failed to poach Lloyd from a similar status program in Arizona), I wasn’t trying to say conference affiliation was a factor by itself. What I meant is that it would probably sting more to lose a coach to a conference rival than it would somewhere like Duke, so it’s good for us no such jobs exist in our conference.
Fair enough. Just using Duke as an example since that’s who you used in your example. I also don’t think they could poach from us no matter what, just that it’s possible if they wanted to.
 
#245      
Fair enough. Just using Duke as an example since that’s who you used in your example. I also don’t think they could poach from us no matter what, just that it’s possible if they wanted to.
I certainly would agree they seem unique in their job appeal. We’ve see UNC and Kentucky get denied lately, and something tells me Duke would have had a better shot, but I guess we can’t be sure!
 
#246      
Do we have any spots left that BU could snag a player testing his 15 day transfer window options? (Excuse my recruiting ignorance this off-season)
 
#248      
I will NEVER EVER feel sorry for scUM.............serves them right for all their misdeeds they have made over the years......

my hate for scUM goes all the way to my bones......yep , that's it .....bone deep hatred.....hope they crash and burn every year......

I really really really do.............................
 
#249      
Always and forever . . .

IMG_0010.jpeg
 
#250      
Also, I get that we're on a college sports board, but the constant state of shock that a basketball professional would eagerly pursue the chance to work at the highest level of basketball in the world is kind of silly.
Not to mention, the NBA is just a better job in general. The college grind never ends. When you aren't in season, you are running from high school gym to high school gym to see kids play, negotiating with your current and prospective transfer candidates, scheduling, glad-handing donors, running or attending workshops, etc.

In the NBA, most coaches just get to concentrate on basketball. There is a true off-season, where they may have a role in the front office, but they aren't (typically) expected to be the CEO. There are a lot more games, but that should be the fun part. While the lifestyle of high major college athletics has improved significantly, it still isn't the NBA...
 
Back