Duke 31, Illinois 27 Postgame

#101      
We had 0 punts.
And lost.
We had 0 punts and.... 2 made field goals, one missed field goal, one interception and turned the ball over on downs twice. We had three touchdowns and were stopped on the other 6 possessions. We scored 3 points in the second half. Very few teams win scoring 3 point in the second half and gaining 3.5 yard per rushing attempt.
 
#102      
On the one hand it's absolutely true that the changes were made on defense completely with NIL in mind.

On the other hand, it's not like we're lacking in football NIL resources relative to Duke.

I do begin to wonder a bit if Bielema doesn't fully grasp how much the change in defensive philosophy changes the whole identity of the program, which was previously so hand-in-glove united in all areas.

And well, I'm not sure what else to say besides "I told you so" to the people who spent the last few years playing make-believe that Aaron Henry was running the worst defense in the history of the sport. Gonna be a long season folks.


Lol this might be the single hottest take in the history of this website
I wouldn't go quite that far. Who was responsible for recruiting the players who are now producing the poorest defense we have put on the field since early in Lovie's tenure? You have to recruit and retain at this level in addition to coaching up what you have. That has been sorely missing on the defensive side for quite a few years.
 
#105      
Is Feagan still on the team? Seems to have disappeared.
He was targeted in be 4th, but slowed route down instead of trying to get open to bail Hauser out. Houser threw it behind him, but he should have scrambled for maybe a 1st down.
 
Last edited:
#106      
I agree. The only other way to win without lot of money is like Iowa where they develop lineman thru years in the program. Bret’s been here for a full cycle of players and not much O or D Line development happening.
Well, that makes three of us. Looks like we are in the minority however. It was a game we could have won - defense was better in the second half. Offensively, we stopped looking down the field. While I don't understand, I think our offensive coaching staff know what they are doing. For the 3 - 5 - 3 to be more effective, we have to move the ball more quickly.
 
#108      
Exactly. At the end of the game, they gave us all we (should’ve) needed and then some.

The offense just fell off a cliff.

To me the latter was more disappointing. This program the last two years, was BUILT on plays made when it mattered the most, by the offense.
Claims that Houser was better than Altmyer were, uh, let's be nice and just say premature.

Houser is a talented kid, but I think all the way around that team needs to look itself in the mirror and realize it is now in the shootout business.
 
#110      
I still think what is desperately missing from our offense is an RB screen and getting our RBs out in space. Both Valentine and Laughery are fast and not traditional bruising backs. Getting them the ball in position to break a big one while also serving as a pressure relief is something that would’ve helped in that 2nd half when Duke was pressuring Hauser more
 
#112      
Exactly. At the end of the game, they gave us all we (should’ve) needed and then some.

The offense just fell off a cliff.

To me the latter was more disappointing. This program the last two years, was BUILT on plays made when it mattered the most, by the offense.
also felt like the play calling was weird in the second half. predictable runs, gimmick plays at odd times.

maybe Duke made some amazing half time adjustments but it felt more like the problem was on our side of the ball.

Lunney gets an A for the first half, __ for the 2nd?
 
#113      
Bielema worst managed games since being here? It’s up there.

You know the defense sucks.. accept it and realize you have to win shoutouts.. so don’t run three plays in three minutes of game clock!!

Rebuild year so have to manage expectations and Lunney had a pathetic second half but what a winnable game.
The mismanagement of timeouts in BOTH halves is going extremely underreported.
 
#114      
Claims that Houser was better than Altmyer were, uh, let's be nice and just say premature.

Houser is a talented kid, but I think all the way around that team needs to look itself in the mirror and realize it is now in the shootout business.
I think we win this game with Luke. Houser seemed a little like the pressure of the moment got to him on the last two drives.
 
#117      
Houser needs to get more comfortable with his other targets. All of our B10 opponents will take away Dixon and he needs to move to other receivers/TEs quickly. I kind of wonder what Eberhart could do in this offense if they aren't going to play him on defense. . .

I really hope this doesn't spiral and the injuries are not multiple weeks out for the offensive line. If they play like they did today, Purdue will be a dogfight.

Could any of the 2001 returnees have put a uniform back on to help these guys out? B Lloyd looked like he could still torch a defense (and Howard Griffith for that matter)!

Edit: How in the world do we lose multiple timeouts to injuries after the ball is set? The coaches should tell the players if you are hurt, stay down. Bad game for everyone today.
 
Last edited:
#118      
We had 0 punts.
And lost.
We would pass on first down and get 7 to 9 yards and then run it 2x and have to pass on 4th down.

N then after the game the Athletic Dept does not have the shuttle drop offs n pick n ups labeled this year, two weeks now i ask drivers and they dont do whatbthey said and that's a cluster this year. We leave early to hop on the shuttle and avoid traffic for the long drive home and yet its seven and still stuck. At least figure out your parking and shuttle service and put up freaking signs this year like last!
 
#120      
I have unwavering faith in Bret. I worry that we need infinitely more money for better talent and coordinators to the point where we’ll lose momentum.
Yeah that’s it. I don’t understand alll the complaints. If we don’t have the NIL $$ we can’t win. I know there teams out there that win with less $$, but it’s not sustainable.
 
#122      
This is a game they definitely should have won. A terrible defensive game altogether, and the offense followed suit in the 2nd half.
 
#123      
Houser needs to get more comfortable with his other targets. All of our B10 opponents will take away Dixon and he needs to move to other receivers/TEs quickly. I kind of wonder what Eberhart could do in this offense if they aren't going to play him on defense. . .

I really hope this doesn't spiral and the injuries are not multiple weeks out for the offensive line. If they play like they did today, Purdue will be a dogfight.

Could any of the 2001 returnees put a uniform back on to help these guys out? B Lloyd looked like he could still torch a defense (and Howard Griffith for that matter)!

Eberhart still isn’t 100%. We are basically playing 3 guys at wr
 
#125      
I think we win this game with Luke. Houser seemed a little like the pressure of the moment got to him on the last two drives.
He has gotten locked into Dixon and STARES him down. Duke had absolutely no doubt where he was going with it. No progressions, no reading what the defense is doing.....he just locked in and let it go. One was a pick and another was a 4th down play and the route was 5 yards short of the first down. It went that way anyway.

Yes, with Luke that would have been a win. That stat where we won 5 straight one score games was due to Luke. Have to figure out a way to move on. If the offensive line is as bad off as it looks, I may go with the most athletic QB on the roster who can get outside the pocket and do damage. Now, we'd never get another transfer QB ever again, but after Southern IL..... there are absolutely no more games that we can feel good about.
 
Back