DC Bobby Hauck out at Illinois

#401      
It's a blank sheet of paper next year. Hope Larry Gies' stock portfolio is doing well!

Realistically what starters back for next year? juice, Barna, Farrell and Holmes? You hope guys like Eberhart, Hankins and Beerman can also step up. But it’s pretty bad how little we return and the talent that’s left
 
#402      
Realistically what starters back for next year? juice, Barna, Farrell and Holmes? You hope guys like Eberhart, Hankins and Beerman can also step up. But it’s pretty bad how little we return and the talent that’s left
Well and I mean the offense too without Houser.

Heaven knows what the price level will be, what the roster rules will be, we've been very resistant to the entropy of the sport under Bielema but no one avoids it forever.

10 fine it happens, 12 fine it happens, 9 can’t happen. I actually don’t know if I’ve ever seen it happen in college football. Also don’t forget the Duke game when we had 11 and the 11th guy ran off causing an offsides because the communication was butchered.
It's one of those tip of the iceberg things where if we can't even do THAT right, there's much more systemic problems.
 
#403      
What are the expectations this weekend for our defense now that we have a new coach calling the shots? If we let up 28+ to Purdue, where does the blame go?
Meh, fans will blame whoever they want but it matters little. Doesn’t change the players on the field. We can try changing scheme a little or try simplifying the playbook to try and put the players in better positions, but that doesn’t matter much if our defensive front can’t get any penetration, let alone pressure without blitzing, and can’t stop the run without stacking the box or run blitzing. At this point it’s what it is and we have to try making the most of what we have this year and work towards fixing the talent problem for next year
 
#404      
Fully understand firing Hauck doesn't magically make the defense good or even average. The ship is already heading in one direction and it's not going to change directions mid-season. Here's what I honestly expect: the defense will gradually improve over the season, probably as it would have if we retained Bobby, if not even a little better.

Also, people on the message board complaining about Hauck had no influence on what happened. Either his heart wasn't in it or Bret determined the results weren't good enough. There is little point in defending him now.
I'm not willing to throw the towel in on our defense yet. I've seen it turned around here before with no changes in personnel or coaches.
 
#405      
Aaron Henry is another story altogether.

View attachment 51861
giphy.gif
 
#406      
What are the expectations this weekend for our defense now that we have a new coach calling the shots? If we let up 28+ to Purdue, where does the blame go?
All that matters is whether our offense can keep scoring. Getting back Matelau, Henderson, Platt will only make us more dynamic.

Just need one more point than the opposition.
 
#407      
Well and I mean the offense too without Houser.

Heaven knows what the price level will be, what the roster rules will be, we've been very resistant to the entropy of the sport under Bielema but no one avoids it forever.


It's one of those tip of the iceberg things where if we can't even do THAT right, there's much more systemic problems.

Atleast for the offense you have valentine, Barnett, Dixon, Trimble, Abney,Stoffel, Faegin. The only linemen that will graduate is Renfro. You also have Konkey and Rankin. With that being said any of these guys could transfer. But this is a pretty good start.

Hopefully this time around when we bring in a dc they are able to bring players with them for the defense.
 
#408      
I haven't a clue. It's painfully obvious, but I think it's a form of self soothing. They want to find someone to blame versus addressing the problem, which is significant. They are hoping that one decision fixes the problem and don't want to accept the fact that that entire side of the ball needs an upgrade and that can't be fixed this year.

There is no way that a reasonable person can't see that the guys we throw out there are slower, less athletic and can't physically match up with the opponent. These other teams a just bigger, taller, faster and have better athletes.....on defense.

We spent our money on the offense. If the reverse was true, these same people would want Lunney fired.

This is not an easy fix when we have no financial answers. That's the crux of the issue.
As to your last sentence, I would think this is when the AD would step in and point out to the monied supporters that Illinois needs more resources to compete at a higher level. Pure speculation on my part.
 
#410      
As to your last sentence, I would think this is when the AD would step in and point out to the monied supporters that Illinois needs more resources to compete at a higher level. Pure speculation on my part.
That message has been going to every monied supporter of every program in the country louder and louder and louder for five plus years, to be clear.

The obviously unsustainable rocket ship into a cliff continues apace for the sport.

I totally agree. Why would Veneables, who has the been the DC on teams which have won national championships come to Illinois with its limited resources?
Bielema and Venables are both branches on the Hayden Fry/Bill Snyder/Stoops Family coaching tree, but they've never worked together.
 
#411      
Atleast for the offense you have valentine, Barnett, Dixon, Trimble, Abney,Stoffel, Faegin. The only linemen that will graduate is Renfro. You also have Konkey and Rankin. With that being said any of these guys could transfer. But this is a pretty good start.

Hopefully this time around when we bring in a dc they are able to bring players with them for the defense.

10,000 IQ move from Bret:

Step 1: "Fire" Henry
Step 2: Use connections to get Henry a spot at an annual playoff contender
Step 3: Have Henry get chummy with the players, swear blood oaths to one another, and institute a ride or die mantra
Step 4: Have Henry utilize his access to said playoff contender's video room to splice in subliminal "I-L-L I-N-I" messages into the game and practice film
Step 5: Get said playoff contender to the playoffs
Step 6: Activate sleeper agent Henry, have him sabotage said playoff contender's offense and stage a fake argument with the head coach making it seem like the coach was blaming the defensive players and scheme.
Step 7: Have Henry resign his position from said playoff contender citing irreconcilable differences and in good conscience he could not stay
Step 8: Get "Re-Hired" by Bret and Illinois
Step 9: Have Henry Pied Piper the entire defense of the now former playoff contender to come with him and transfer to Illinois "For Love of the game" and a coupon for a free pan pizza from Papa Del's as we can't really offer them NIL with how much we spend on the offense
Step 10: Win the National Championship
Step 11: Erect a gigantic statue of Bielema in T pose outside Memorial Stadium
Step 12: Bret ascends to godhood and becomes the new Touchdown Jesus.

Profit.

Seriously though, yeah, whoever we wind up hiring we're going to need them to help fill a bunch of spots as it's going to be difficult to find the money to mercenary up so many roster spots.
 
#413      
Meh, fans will blame whoever they want but it matters little. Doesn’t change the players on the field. We can try changing scheme a little or try simplifying the playbook to try and put the players in better positions, but that doesn’t matter much if our defensive front can’t get any penetration, let alone pressure without blitzing, and can’t stop the run without stacking the box or run blitzing. At this point it’s what it is and we have to try making the most of what we have this year and work towards fixing the talent problem for next year
Thank for this post. I will stick with my view that it’s somewhat of a low class move to fire our DC after 4 games. Let him coach out the season and fire him afterwards. Makes me wonder if our wealthy donors were pushing for his firing.
Definitely lost respect for Whitman.
 
#415      
Thank for this post. I will stick with my view that it’s somewhat of a low class move to fire our DC after 4 games. Let him coach out the season and fire him afterwards. Makes me wonder if our wealthy donors were pushing for his firing.
Definitely lost respect for Whitman.

The way this seems to have played out - I think Bielema was actually planning to do what you wanted. He let Hauck know that changes (we don't know exactly what) were going to be made. Hauck wasn't in agreement with the changes and wanted out. Hauck and Whitman/Bielema then came to some agreement for his departure.

Seems somewhat reasonable given Hauck's demeanor and reputation.
 
#416      
Well and I mean the offense too without Houser.

Heaven knows what the price level will be, what the roster rules will be, we've been very resistant to the entropy of the sport under Bielema but no one avoids it forever.


It's one of those tip of the iceberg things where if we can't even do THAT right, there's much more systemic problems.
The offense will be fine - we will find a QB in the portal if Boyd, etc aren't good enough. On defense, we need the current freshmen to step up in a big way in addition to being smarter in the portal

Speaking of which, we have missed the boat badly in terms of talent evaluation and $ allocation. To be blunt, you spend your money on quality CB's and D-linemen because that's where the talent is scarce. Quality Safeties and LB's, while not a dime a dozen, are a lot more common than CB's and DL, so you should be able to find quality players without breaking the bank. Bailey and X are very good players (and I'm not so sure about X to be honest), but to pay them big $ while having mid-level MAC talent in the D-Line is pure malpractice. And the ongoing lack of talent and performance from our LB's is mind-boggling.

And I agree about the entropy under BB. Our talent level is lower now than what he inherited, particularly on defense. That has been masked by superior QB play and a strong OC, but it is catching up to us this year.
 
#418      
10 fine it happens, 12 fine it happens, 9 can’t happen. I actually don’t know if I’ve ever seen it happen in college football. Also don’t forget the Duke game when we had 11 and the 11th guy ran off causing an offsides because the communication was butchered.
I yelled at the TV, "Why are you across the line of scrimmage??? Run off the field on your own side!!!" Seriously, have you ever wished that a guy running off the field was on the opponents' side of the line? "Boy, I sure wish he was across the line of scrimmage jogging off the field!" Never!!!!!
 
#419      
The way this seems to have played out - I think Bielema was actually planning to do what you wanted. He let Hauck know that changes (we don't know exactly what) were going to be made. Hauck wasn't in agreement with the changes and wanted out. Hauck and Whitman/Bielema then came to some agreement for his departure.

Seems somewhat reasonable given Hauck's demeanor and reputation.
I did not know that. Okay, that makes more sense.
 
#421      
I yelled at the TV, "Why are you across the line of scrimmage??? Run off the field on your own side!!!" Seriously, have you ever wished that a guy running off the field was on the opponents' side of the line? "Boy, I sure wish he was across the line of scrimmage jogging off the field!" Never!!!!!
That's a good point. If he legitimately just runs towards the sideline behind the LOS, we get the stop and get the ball back. So infuriating and likely cost us the game.
 
#422      
Just heard Hauck is out as DC. There were a lot of calls for his head last season, too, as I recall. Wish granted. Now what?
 
Back