DC Bobby Hauck out at Illinois

#426      
The way this seems to have played out - I think Bielema was actually planning to do what you wanted. He let Hauck know that changes (we don't know exactly what) were going to be made. Hauck wasn't in agreement with the changes and wanted out. Hauck and Whitman/Bielema then came to some agreement for his departure.

Seems somewhat reasonable given Hauck's demeanor and reputation.
it’s big business. I don’t feel bad for anyone making $700,00 per year .
 
#427      
Thank for this post. I will stick with my view that it’s somewhat of a low class move to fire our DC after 4 games. Let him coach out the season and fire him afterwards. Makes me wonder if our wealthy donors were pushing for his firing.
Definitely lost respect for Whitman.
Leaving an obviously underperforming person in place is bad management. It’s very corrosive to morale. Sometimes you need to pull the bandage off quickly. It’s not easy or painless, but it’s the right thing to do once multiple egregious failures occur (e.g. 9 players on the field). Such gross incompetence was almost akin to public insubordination. At that point, failure to act decisively would reflect terribly on Bret. Great leaders must make tough decisions like this.
 
Back