2017 Coaching Carousel

Status
Not open for further replies.
#4,978      
Another brain surgeon who would rather have Bruce Pearl as their coach.

That's not what he said, this is not a question of character, neither did he say that he wanted Pearl as his coach. I despise Pearl with a passion, but that does not mean that Martin achieved more at Tennessee than Pearl.
 
#4,979      
Like it was mentioned before with Coach Calipari, Scott Drew comes here and the NCAA comes a knockin' with sanctions just as soon as the ink is dry on his contract.

Don't lump Scott Drew with the football team. Has Drew even been hit with any sanctions in 14 years? I don't remember of any issues. In fact, he suspended one of his guys from tonight's game. As far as I can tell, he runs a tight ship.
 
#4,980      
Don't lump Scott Drew with the football team. Has Drew even been hit with any sanctions in 14 years? I don't remember of any issues. In fact, he suspended one of his guys from tonight's game. As far as I can tell, he runs a tight ship.
Ummm, then you've missed a lot.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
 
#4,981      
Ummm, then you've missed a lot.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

"CBS Sports’ anonymous poll found that “almost nobody has a specific story (of wrongdoing) but nearly everybody believes ‘he’s gotta be doing something.’

Apparently the man is guilty before being proven guilty. What a great country we live in. Name me 1 specific violation this man has had and then let's debate.
 
#4,985      

Seems like fairly minor stuff. Impermissible phone calls resulting in a couple of scholarships taken away....But, I guess I can see where there might be some cause for concern. Apparently, the blue blood of college basketball didn't think it was a major issue to hire Calipari, the king of violators, so much ado about nothing as far as I'm concerned. But, Whitman may end up staying clear of Drew as a result of past issues, however small they may be after what has happened with the women's bball team and the football team.
 
Last edited:
#4,986      

89illinigrad

Chicago
It sure sounds to me like the consensus is that Cuonzo is the safe bet. He doesn't feel like the kind of pick Whitman would make. It makes me think he would have to change his mantra from #WeWillWin to #WeWillWinEnough. At least on the basketball side anyway. I don't think Whitman will make his hire out of fear like Guenther always did.

I think Cuonzo is considered "safe" in that he could probably come in here and have a career like Henson, in that he could attract a lot of the top talent from in state to the UofI, make it to the tourney consistently and, when all the stars align just right, make a run at a Final 4.

Remember that, in his 21 years at Illinois, Henson had just 1 BIG championship, made the tourney 12 times and in those 12 appearances, he had 1 Sweet 16 (1985), 1 Elite 8 (1984) and 1 Final 4 (1989).

If that is Martin's "floor", I think many people would be happy with that.

Keatts, on the other had, has many thinking his upside is that of Bill Self, while others see a downside of Groce.

So, it comes down to just how risk adverse you are.
 
#4,987      

sacraig

The desert
I'm at an Arizona basketball game right now. Afterward I'll go track down Sean Miller and ask if he or Archie have any interest.
 
#4,988      
Johnny Dawkins?

No, a very mediocre campaign at Stanford. I think he made the NCAA's 1 or 2 out of 8 seasons. On a side note, he is UCF's coach and they've got a 7'6" player, Tacko Fall. He had his way against Cincinnati with a double-double. He's not very quick footed or agile, but he does a great job of shot blocking and just altering the opposition's shots in general. Also, he is the master of dunking the basketball. I don't think he missed a shot tonight. Dawkins does have UCF back to respectability but not a B10 caliber coach(a lot like Tommy Amaker).
 
#4,989      

89illinigrad

Chicago
Seems like fairly minor stuff. Impermissible phone calls resulting in a couple of scholarships taken away....But, I guess I can see where there might be some cause for concern. Apparently, the blue blood of college basketball didn't think it was a major issue to hire Calipari, the king of violators, so much ado about nothing as far as I'm concerned. But, Whitman may end up staying clear of Drew as a result of past issues, however small they may be after what has happened with the women's bball team and the football team.

Don't forget the men's basketball run ins with the NCAA (Slush Fund, Bruce Pearl) may make our AD less likely to hire anyone with even a hint of past improprieties (which may preclude Keatts as well--guilty by association with Louisville).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
#4,990      
Apparently, the blue blood of college basketball didn't think it was a major issue to hire Calipari, the king of violators, so much ado about nothing as far as I'm concerned.

LOL

Yeah, Kentucky isn't worried about hiring a coach that cheats. They have a long and storied history of doing whatever it takes to win. In fact, they'd probably fire him if he didn't bend the rules. Look what happened to Tubby.
 
#4,991      
Don't forget the men's basketball run ins with the NCAA (Slush Fund, Bruce Pearl) may make our AD less likely to hire anyone with even a hint of past improprieties (which may preclude Keatts as well--guilty by association with Louisville).

Slush fund was over 50 years ago. Pearl stuff was 27 years ago. Dang, I'm old.
 
#4,992      
Another brain surgeon who would rather have Bruce Pearl as their coach. You can keep that dirt bag and his cesspool that trails behind him.

...

I don't have to defend my credibility, I stated my reasons based on my experiences. So stick to Wiki or Google or pay a premium for inside info.

http://deadspin.com/5870586/recruit...eautiful-girl-to-tell-him-to-attend-tennessee

Do you need more reasons why Martin was more successful than Pearl at UT. Success is defined by more than who won an extra game in the NCAA. Pearl is a scumbag, no comparison to Martin.

When did I say I wanted to hire Bruce Pearl? Don't be obtuse. :hand:

You said Cuonzo upgraded Tennessee. That is FALSE. I asked you to give me an evidence to support how, on the court, Cuonzo upgraded Tennessee. I'll wait.

Read my posts, I take issue with false conclusions/narratives. That doesn't mean I'm arguing for Pearl, I'm arguing against using falsehoods to prop up a candidate. Let's compare and evaluate our potential candidates on fact, not fiction.

The question was whether Martin continued or bettered the on court success at Tennessee after Pearl was fired.

Yup.
 
Last edited:
#4,993      
Don't lump Scott Drew with the football team. Has Drew even been hit with any sanctions in 14 years? I don't remember of any issues. In fact, he suspended one of his guys from tonight's game. As far as I can tell, he runs a tight ship.

I imagine Drew's program has been looked at closely because of all the problems Baylor has had with football. IMO, he would be a great hire, but if he decides to leave Baylor (unless he is proven of more wrong doing other than some phone calls by the staff) a number of schools would line up to get him.
If Roy Williams became available & the Illini signed him, most fans would call it a home run hire. What his school & program, IMO, was a lot worse than phone calls.
 
Last edited:
#4,994      

Deleted member 29907

D
Guest
The point isn't whether Pearl is scum. He is. It's also not about who you would rather have Martin vs Pearl because Pearl can't come here.

The question was whether Martin continued or bettered the on court success at Tennessee after Pearl was fired.

But doesn't the 'scum' part play a part in his on court success?

If someone cheats - are the results better than someone who plays square and perhaps doesn't put up exactly the same numbers?

Sure, you can say this argument is purely on numbers - but in reality if life were only numbers - judgement would not be necessary.
 
#4,995      

whovous

Washington, DC
But there is no judgment to be made here. Not one person has suggested taking Pearl instead of Martin. The question is who had better results at TN. No one questions that Pearl is scum or that said scummitude played a major role in his results.
 
#4,996      
I like Keatts, but I'm fairly convinced it won't be him. Archie Miller is my #1 choice, but I'd put the chances of him being hired at about 15% because it seems like he might want to wait for NC St. I put C. Martin at 35%, Monty Williams at 20%, Keatts at 2%, and someone else besides those listed at 28%. Though I don't think it would be terrible if Keatts was hired, it would be disappointing because I'm guessing while he might be in Whitman's top 10 candidates he is closer to number 10 than 5, which would mean a whole lot of coaches turned us down.
 
#4,997      
I find it highly unlikely that the HC of Hargrave for 10 years is even remotely clean. Also, isn't anyone concerned that Keatts was there for so long without moving to the college ranks?

Based on commits, it appears that the reason Louisville hired Keatts was to open a Hargrave pipeline (i.e., Montrezl Harrell, Terry Rozier, Anton Gill, etc.).

:confused:
 
#4,998      

TownieMatt

CU Expat
Chicago
I like Keatts, but I'm fairly convinced it won't be him. Archie Miller is my #1 choice, but I'd put the chances of him being hired at about 15% because it seems like he might want to wait for NC St. I put C. Martin at 35%, Monty Williams at 20%, Keatts at 2%, and someone else besides those listed at 28%. Though I don't think it would be terrible if Keatts was hired, it would be disappointing because I'm guessing while he might be in Whitman's top 10 candidates he is closer to number 10 than 5, which would mean a whole lot of coaches turned us down.

I'd say you're a little high on Counzo and Williams and low on Keatts. I also think the chances of it being someone else is higher than 28%.

Given the way Groce has turned out, I think most ADs would not hire another mid-major, unproven coach (i.e. Keatts). The tendency is always to hire someone completely different than the guy you just fired. That was certainly the case for Beckman -> Lovie. I think that's why many believe the Monty Williams rumor, it's an awful lot like the Lovie hire (fire mid-major guy, hire a guy with pro-experience). But JW had a connection to Lovie, so I'm not sure we should expect the same type of hire here.
 
#4,999      
I like Keatts, but I'm fairly convinced it won't be him. Archie Miller is my #1 choice, but I'd put the chances of him being hired at about 15% because it seems like he might want to wait for NC St. I put C. Martin at 35%, Monty Williams at 20%, Keatts at 2%, and someone else besides those listed at 28%. Though I don't think it would be terrible if Keatts was hired, it would be disappointing because I'm guessing while he might be in Whitman's top 10 candidates he is closer to number 10 than 5, which would mean a whole lot of coaches turned us down.

You've built quite the mountain of odds. I'm pretty sure from what's been publically said or shown, it's probably 25% Cuonzo, 75% nobody has any clue.
 
#5,000      

Tevo

Wilmette, IL
Kind of confused here about all the love for Martin. When Weber was our coach, I distinctly remember people hating on the offensive system he ran. Isn't Martin from the same coaching tree? Wouldn't the offense look similar? I am also not blown away with the supposed transformations of the programs that he inherited. I will give you that his recruiting seems solid and he should be able to do good things recruiting the talent rich Metro East region but other than that, I see Kevin Stallings. Just trying to get why a majority of people support this guy over some of the other potential candidates....

Just to be clear, the offensive "system" that Weber ran was fan-freakin-tastic when we had Deron, Dee, Luther, Augie and Rog running it. I didn't mind it one bit with players who had loads of talent and an abundance of chemistry.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.