2019-20 Coaching Discussion/Carousel

Status
Not open for further replies.
#401      
This is somewhat "0440 breaking news". I don't believe you've been this definitive in your posts before (certainly correct me if I'm wrong). You mentioned further down that Whitman hasn't put feelers out...yet. Absent an unlikely run and 4(hopefully) wins, you think he will make a change?
Beat Rutgers and sneak in another win is that enough with all the losses being close? That is the question, we are just good enough to make this decision harder than it should be. I Don't think he comes back with less than 5 wins, attendance next year will be even worse than what it already is.
 
#402      
The program cannot afford him not to make a change in that case. Can you imagine what ticket sales will be like next year after 3, 2, 4, and 4 win seasons under the same coach? The athletic budget cannot afford for football to not be a huge revenue builder.

Ticket sales really do little to affect the DIA revenue. Total ticket sales (all sports) are only 11% of the total DIA revenue. Only four BIG schools generate over $30m in ticket sales (AnOSU, Mich, PSU and Neb). All of the others are under $30mil. Illinois is close to $10 mil. (2018 stats). The DIA revenues are 74% from outside distributions (TV, BIG and NCAA 51% and contributions 23%). Scary what will happen to most BIG schools if TV revenues dry up.
 
#403      
Ticket sales really do little to affect the DIA revenue. Total ticket sales (all sports) are only 11% of the total DIA revenue. Only four BIG schools generate over $30m in ticket sales (AnOSU, Mich, PSU and Neb). All of the others are under $30mil. Illinois is close to $10 mil. (2018 stats). The DIA revenues are 74% from outside distributions (TV, BIG and NCAA 51% and contributions 23%). Scary what will happen to most BIG schools if TV revenues dry up.

I'll be honest: I didn't realize it was that low of a percentage, but the implications it can have on recruiting (watching a game in a dead stadium or seeing it on TV) are scary, along with the effects it can (and has) had on donations to the athletic department.
 
#404      

ChiefGritty

Chicago, IL
Ticket sales really do little to affect the DIA revenue. Total ticket sales (all sports) are only 11% of the total DIA revenue. Only four BIG schools generate over $30m in ticket sales (AnOSU, Mich, PSU and Neb). All of the others are under $30mil. Illinois is close to $10 mil. (2018 stats). The DIA revenues are 74% from outside distributions (TV, BIG and NCAA 51% and contributions 23%). Scary what will happen to most BIG schools if TV revenues dry up.

Tickets 11%, Contributions 23%, TV money 51%. Thus lies the balance of power.
 
#405      
Ticket sales really do little to affect the DIA revenue. Total ticket sales (all sports) are only 11% of the total DIA revenue. Only four BIG schools generate over $30m in ticket sales (AnOSU, Mich, PSU and Neb). All of the others are under $30mil. Illinois is close to $10 mil. (2018 stats). The DIA revenues are 74% from outside distributions (TV, BIG and NCAA 51% and contributions 23%). Scary what will happen to most BIG schools if TV revenues dry up.
Iowa reported over $25 mil from ticket sales in FY 2018, Wisconsin reported over $31 mil from ticket sales for 2017-2018. I wouldn't call the difference in ticket sales between Illinois and either of those schools "little." Even if Illinois could increase ticket sales by "only" $10 mil, that would be pretty significant. I understand you were stating with respect to losing even more ticket sales, but my point is that it shouldn't really be as low a percentage as it is.
 
Last edited:
#406      
Iowa reported over $25 mil from ticket sales in FY 2018, Wisconsin reported over $31 mil from ticket sales for 2017-2018. I wouldn't call the difference in ticket sales between Illinois and either of those schools "little." Even if Illinois could increase ticket sales by "only" $10 mil, that would be pretty significant. I understand you were stating with respect to losing even more ticket sales, but my point is that it shouldn't really be as low a percentage as it is.

And if we want to dream of the upper stratosphere AnOSU had roughly $60 mil ticket sales for 2018.
 
#410      

Deleted member 646108

D
Guest
I mean Whitman hired Underwood mainly because of his style of play....but translate that to football and I think that favors an Air Raid guy.
I haven’t followed Washington State (other than their recent QB seems to be doing well in the NFL) but Mike Leach coaching like he did at Texas Tech would at least be entertaining to watch and would fill the stadium.
 
#411      

ChiefGritty

Chicago, IL
I haven’t followed Washington State (other than their recent QB seems to be doing well in the NFL) but Mike Leach coaching like he did at Texas Tech would at least be entertaining to watch and would fill the stadium.

Powerful "I go to bed before Pac 12 games start" energy.
 
#412      

Deleted member 654622

D
Guest
People sure seem to like it when at least one former player is on the staff, so I thought I'd check in on the Illini who are coaching I could think of.

Greg Lewis: WR coach for the Chiefs since 2017 after being let go from the same position for the Eagles. Had the same title in three successive years at U of San Diego, San Jose St, and Pitt (under Paul Chryst). I'm guessing he wouldn't voluntarily extricate himself from being a part of the Reid-Mahomes offense without a big bump in pay and title.

Aaron Moorehead: Pretty impressive college resume on paper as a WR coach for Virginia Tech, then Texas A&M, and now Vanderbilt. Why no upgrade in title though? It's Vanderbilt, but Derek Mason is in his 6th year and they still haven't had a winning season. 0-3 so far this year, so he might be on the market if we're looking.

Nate Scheelhaase: Unfortunately we can't help but keep up with his accomplishments. Switched from RBs to WRs this year for Matt Campbell at Iowa State. 247 ranked him as the 10th best 2019 recruiter in the Big 12. We spurned him for Cory Patterson (10th best 2019 Big Ten recruiter), but would he hold that against a new coach?

Mike Bellamy: Has he brought enough to the table to be retained? I doubt it.

Luke Butkus: Yeah, don't think either party would want a third bite of that apple. I'm assuming he'll stay in the pros as long as he can.

John Holecek: The meatball WDWS caller Dark Horse Candidate for the head job the last (two?) time(s) around. Turned down an offer to be on Lovie's first staff for family reasons. Maybe things have changed? Helming an absolute juggernaut at Loyola Academy.

Chris James: In his second year as the head coach at Morgan Park. Can't really tell what kind of coaching chops he's got yet (5-8 record so far), but is well known and connected in Chicago from his work in the community.

Terry Hawthorne: As the DB coach at ESL, obviously not yet qualified for a proper assistant spot, but there's got to be some role for him to grow in. I'm not aware if Lovie has already tried. Despite the turmoil during his Illinois career he's remained a strong supporter of the team and university. Strengthening the relationship with the Flyers would be great.

Who did I forget?
Just want to hit on two
Aaron Moorehead was once a great recruiter for Texas A&M I believe
Mike Bellamy BETTER be retained. He is working
 
#413      

Deleted member 654622

D
Guest
Oh no!

Give it to me straight, I can take it
Triple option isn't coming
face%20_punch_lady.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
#414      
What is better for the program long term?

Lovie somehow goes 6-6 this season and we make a bowl game. He is retained and little to no changes are made to the current staff.

OR

Lovie goes 4-8 and we are able to hire our Option A guy. (Think Mike Norvell or Luke Fickell esque).
 
#415      
I mean Whitman hired Underwood mainly because of his style of play....but translate that to football and I think that favors an Air Raid guy.

Seth Littrell, Graham Harrell, Josh Heupel, Jake Spavital, Jay Norvell, Sonny Cumbie, Robert Anae are some names that would match that profile.
 
#416      

Illinifan533

Normal, Illinois
What is better for the program long term?

Lovie somehow goes 6-6 this season and we make a bowl game. He is retained and little to no changes are made to the current staff.

OR

Lovie goes 4-8 and we are able to hire our Option A guy. (Think Mike Norvell or Luke Fickell esque).


If the Illini somehow go 6-6, that probably means some necessary adjustments were made and that Lovie actually has the team on an upward trend. I don't see it as the same death knell for the program like the 2014 Illini going 6-6 was.
 
#417      
Seth Littrell, Graham Harrell, Josh Heupel, Jake Spavital, Jay Norvell, Sonny Cumbie, Robert Anae are some names that would match that profile.
While I still think Graham is a little green....I think he is most similar to Leach in what kind of players he is looking for and how to teach the offense.
 
#418      

Deleted member 654622

D
Guest
What is better for the program long term?

Lovie somehow goes 6-6 this season and we make a bowl game. He is retained and little to no changes are made to the current staff.

OR

Lovie goes 4-8 and we are able to hire our Option A guy. (Think Mike Norvell or Luke Fickell esque).
I am in the boat that it is always better/cheaper to keep your current employees and make them better. If we go 6-6, then some serious coaching has been done. I'll even say if we go 5-7 at this point.
For me, I want to see what the defensive line looks like at the end of the season. If we go 5-7+ despite our defense, then I think we need to go with Option A guy. I say that with a heavy heart because I see the young talent that could be the anchor to a B1G team title contender in two years (remember I am talking D line). Lovie's base D that he lives on is only going to work with a dominate D line and solid LB core.
St. Louis Rams - Brian Young, Grant Winstrom and London Fletcher
Tampa Bay - Warren freeking Sapp, Brooks and yes Hardy Nickerson
Bears - Tommie Harris AO Urlacher and Briggs
Losing Bobby is for sure a terrible hit. The dude was on his way to getting drafted. It's the Carneys and Gays that have me worried about this staffs ability to develop the young talent on the roster. If they can, then this D will look good eventually. If they cant, then we are going to waste that potential.
 
#419      

mhuml32

Cincinnati, OH
What is better for the program long term?

Lovie somehow goes 6-6 this season and we make a bowl game. He is retained and little to no changes are made to the current staff.

OR

Lovie goes 4-8 and we are able to hire our Option A guy. (Think Mike Norvell or Luke Fickell esque).


Give me option A. 6 wins means 4 B1G wins, which would be incredible. With everyone coming back the next year, it would be easy to dream of a 8-win season.
 
#420      
What is better for the program long term?

Lovie somehow goes 6-6 this season and we make a bowl game. He is retained and little to no changes are made to the current staff.

OR

Lovie goes 4-8 and we are able to hire our Option A guy. (Think Mike Norvell or Luke Fickell esque).
Give me Graham Harrell no matter what haha
 
#421      
If Jake Spavital is all the better we can do, we should stick with Lovie. Eesh.
 
#422      

ChiefGritty

Chicago, IL
What is better for the program long term?

Lovie somehow goes 6-6 this season and we make a bowl game. He is retained and little to no changes are made to the current staff.

OR

Lovie goes 4-8 and we are able to hire our Option A guy. (Think Mike Norvell or Luke Fickell esque).

As between those two choices I think there's little doubt the latter one is the stronger long-term option. But guaranteeing a home-run hire changes the calculus a lot.
 
#423      
This talk about keeping Lovie if he reaches X wins is what I argued against before the season began. If a defender on Nebraska and EMU slipped and fell, Illinois could be 4-0, without any change by the coaches. Illinois could get blown out by Wisconsin, Iowa and the Michigan's, yet still get 4 more wins against Minnesota, Rutgers, Purdue and Northwestern. That's fool's gold. Purdue, Minnesota and Northwestern are down this year, as is Nebraska, but that won't be for long. Lovie has one of the easiest schedules any Illinois coach has possibly ever had, plenty of time to bring in his players and coaches, and yet it still looks like a struggle to be literally average. If the team is not blown out in any games and wins some of these others, then that will demonstrate improvement.
 
#424      

Deleted member 4333

D
Guest
As an incentive for Lovie to retire, Josh will agree to promote Miles to head coach.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.