YesOr does he go to the Bulls now?
YesOr does he go to the Bulls now?
Sarr made the pass because he's under the basket and there's a clear path to make a pass. Boozer tried a jump pass over two players. That's the difference.Here’s what Boozer sees:
View attachment 49051
There’s two UConn players coming to trap him. Up ahead he sees a wide open teammate - if the ball gets there, the game is 100% over.
At the end of the game against full court press, when you’re trapped, you need to pass the ball. What makes you think nothing will happen, they won’t try and pry the ball loose, and just award you a foul? A whole lot can go wrong in that situation as well.
In contrary, he sees a wide open teammate and if he hits him the game is over.
If we’re gonna play “you shouldn’t pass the ball,” then why did Sarr pass it to Boozer to begin with?
View attachment 49052
Meant basket. I've understandably got bracket on the brain right now.Yes that was Dee that throw an ill-advised pass deep on the side of Arizona's bracket. It was picked off and Stoudamire had a chance to win it but Luther blocked it and sent it into OT.
I actually wonder why this doesn't happen more often. It's a no brainer. Heaving it straight up takes at least 3 or 4 seconds off the clock. By the time it lands and someone gets control it's too late.He’d have been better off just throwing the ball straight up in the air as high as he could![]()
Yeah, my Apple Watch was alarming every minute or so "High Heart Rate" the entire second half of our game . . .Hope all of your blood pressure gets to a reasonable level by 5 PM CT Saturday. Holy smokes!
There is no 5 second call in the back courtWhy are people saying Boozer made a major bonehead play, he didn't even need to cross halfcourt? The ball was inbounds with 10 seconds left. Ok cool call a 10 second violation, UConn gets the ball with 0 seconds left. Now it's possible they could have called a 5 second if he just held it there. But that would have been 5 seconds UConn had to swarm him and not foul. He could have held it for 4 or even 3 seconds and then thrown a bad pass and UConn wouldn't have had time. He could have made pass fake to get the defense to move than made a simple pass. He could have just dribbled the ball, he had room. And again, he could have just bent over and covered the ball up.
He panicked and made the worst possible decision. He jumped and threw into 2 guys. Yes Duke did have 2 guys open deep, he threw to the one that made the pass much more difficult than the guy who basically had a half of the court to himself. That said, Evans I think should have come up to get the ball.
So yes, he did everything wrong. He wasn't under control, he didn't seem to know the situation, he left his feet, and he didn't make a good pass. He had a timeout left too.
Your reasoning showcases a classic logical fallacy know as "bad outcome implies bad decision." It comes from a game in the World Series where a live ball is hit into the outfield, George Brett has a full head of steam and is waved around third. The outfielder throws a perfect strike and Brett is tagged out at home. It was still the right call to send Brett, because 99.9% of the time, he scores easily. More recently, Russell Wilson's pass that was intercepted and cost the Seahawks a championship comes to mind. Why didn't they run the ball? Because the Patriots were expecting a run...I completely understand the reasoning to pass...it was failed execution.
The biggest issue was that there was a chance of held ball, which would have given possession to UCONN. However, Duke did have a timeout, so they could have called it to avoid a held ball.
Worst case scenario happened, and there will be Monday morning QB'ing for a long time. Only reason it was a dumb decision is because of the outcome. Those passes over the top are made regularly without second thought a majority of the time when they work. And if that shot isn't drilled from super deep, this conversation doesn't happen. Super crazy occurrence.
There isn’t a 5 second call in the backcourt so yeah they really messed it up.
Oh man… been THERE!Yeah, my Apple Watch was alarming every minute or so "High Heart Rate" the entire second half of our game . . .
By the strict, absolute, 100% letter of the law, that is a technical.I’m still cackling at the Duke play by play guy complaining about wanting a Techincal on the UConn manager coming off the bench.
Literally a perfect encapsulation of everything Duke.
It’s fun to laugh at Duke and Boozer and I have done my fair share, but my God, if that happened to us I would require immediate medical attention.
I don't mid laughing at Duke, but little Boozer? Naw...that is a hard place to be.It’s fun to laugh at Duke and Boozer and I have done my fair share, but my God, if that happened to us I would require immediate medical attention.
It's nice that they're backhandedly pulling for us, but that is some seriously entitled BS right there. They dealt with some serious injuries to important players and still won both their conference regular season and tournament titles not to mention being a Coach-K-nose-length away from a final four appearance. That's a nice season any measure. The Devils Denners should take a laxative, relax and count their blessing given that their program is in the position its in.For your amusement and to save you the trouble, a sampling of verbiage seen during my rubbernecking visit to The Devil's Den (Duke 247 site).
- It does seem the new frontier in the Duke-UNC rivalry is who can choke the hardest in the NCAA tourny.
- Gonna be fun to watch that Mullins shot every year paired with the Laettner shot.
- Scheyer built the team, so that's on him. He seems to be turning into Calipari: overseer of a one-and-done factory that doesn't win championships.
- Scheyer gets the best talent with the best support system in the game, yet his teams repeatedly fail to execute the most basic tasks when the tournament is on the line. ... How many more times do we have to watch a historic, humiliating collapse before it's okay to question the coaching?
- I am really ******** sick and tired of all this ********* from the refs. How many championships have we lost to the opposite of DGAC now? *************.
- It would be unbelievable if it wasn't so ******** typical of how refs have done us for years now.
- sure zona/mich should beat uconn's **** off, but as we saw tonight anything can happen in 1 game.
- I don't think they [UConn] can beat Arizona or Michigan.
- Just let Illinois win it all
By the strict, absolute, 100% letter of the law, that is a technical.
However, no good official is ever going to call that unless something happens to impact the subsequent play.
Officials get to this level partially by understanding what needs to be called and what doesn’t. And a spontaneous response that doesn’t impact play will NEVER be called a technical foul in that circumstance.
I don't mid laughing at Duke, but little Boozer? Naw...that is a hard place to be.