I mean... Andy Katz thought Phil Martelli should get it... on a last place team... Who knows what the criteria is there? I suspect it's all over the map.
Big Ten All-Conference Awards
I agree with pretty much everything you said. The one thing I'd throw out there is that Brad lead us to a 1 seed in the NCAA Tournament in 2020-21, which in and of itself is deserving of coach of the year in the conference. But considering it was only his third season and how bad we were for about a decade before his hiring, that's pretty impressive. Unfortunately, my least favorite coach won it that year and his record would indicate he probably should have. It seems Brad has had a little bad luck on his side when it comes to winning COTY. But I'd bet he cares more about conference titles and deep runs in March than winning COTY. If he keeps doing what he's been doing since coming here he'll get 1 or 2 COTY awards is my guess.
But you are correct, there are a lot of factors that go into COTY (or there should be). Painter is a great coach and I think Brad is right there with him.
ChiefGritty
- Chicago, IL
Well that's not assistant coaching now is it?
No tsj on defensive team? Did they not watch that last game?!!!
He got zero votes on the referee ballots, really hurt his overall numbers. /s
Joel Goodson
- respect my decision™
I'd nominate Juwan Howard for the "Coaching Way Beyond Their Ability" award.
True.To know a coach worth look at how much they make and how long they have been there. Those COY awards mean nothing
Holman won in 2018 and about 5 years later was fired
Pitino won in 2017 and lasted 3 more seasons
Zach I get. Hepburn gets a lot of steals.
. Everybody else ? I think TSJ and Coleman are as good as anybody else on this list.
Last edited:
I guess so, haha. Diebler, a really awful assistant coach but amazing interim head coach? I guess his success at head coaching does strike home that OSU underperformed incredibly while he was an assistant, and only through upwards promotion into a spot where he could do less overall damage is how OSU became successful. I get it, at least that sounds like the corporate way
foby
- Bonnaroo Land
I believe CoHawk didn't get it because he failed to have much success against several big men. However, I believe this to be true; CoHawk could guard Baldwin, Hepburn or Barnhizer and effectively shut them down. The same could not be said of Edey, Ware or CO. CoHawk is by far the most versatile defender in the league, but having to guard the 5 so much did not allow him to regularly display his greatness.
I feel the opposite. Purdue isn't a recruiting powerhouse, and yet he's had some top notch talent and seems to always have a decent to great roster. Every post-game I've watched of his is insightful, respectful, and shows an even keeled coach. Kind of refreshing compared to some of the drama queens the BIG has had. I think he's gotten better over time --has adapted to the game over a long period. Has a 201-116 conference record. That's almost as good as Izzo.
The one knock on him is his tournament resume. Several S16s and an elite 8, but hasn't had the deep run when he's had his best teams.
I think we should just name it the "Juwan Howard Coaching Way Beyond Their Ability Award."
Big Jack
- Decatur
Do you not see who was unanimous and who wasn't? It's literally right there in your face. That should be your first clue that some literally argue Buie over TSJ. I've heard that the entire year from the college basketball 'experts'. The latest being Mark Titus a week or so ago saying he's the 2nd best player in the conference on his podcast.
Last edited:
I mean, it's a vote right? Everybody picks one person, no one is being indecisive...
the national
- the Front Range
This beauty contest will soon be forgotten as it’s tournament time. Their legacies are about to be written. I like our chances. Good luck to the rest of um.
Did they vote on all defensive team before Iowa game? TSJ played best all around defensive game of the Big season then. Crazy how he’s left off of that.
Champaign Toast
Fan since Kiwane Garris
So happy for our three all-conference guys. Hawkins deserved a bit more love, though.
This year's team has been much, much more satisfying to watch than last year's. The main difference for me has been the way Domask has balanced the strengths of Hawkins and Shannon.
We had already seen that the latter two were marquee players. Hope to be watching those guys in the NBA.
I suspect that Hawkins' improved shooting numbers owe something--beyond the shots he put up at Ubben and the new, relaxed mindset--to Domask absorbing pressure, allowing Hawkins to play freer, take fewer shots at the last seconds of the shot clock, and create less for himself on the perimeter.
We have won a number of games by giving the ball to Domask in clutch moments. Mike LaTulip commented a year ago that a go-to offensive player wasn't necessarily essential beyond possibly being a decoy. His point was that anyone could take a big shot. I love the idea in theory, however I remember how many games the Bulls won because they put the ball in Michael Jordan's hands in clutch moments and the other team didn't have Michael Jordan.
In my opinion, our best clutch bucket-getter last year turned out to be Jayden Epps. I am happy to continue to root for the departed guys and see him and Skyy Clark landing premier roles and scoring a lot at Georgetown and Louisville, albeit their point totals are accompanied by low field goal percentages and losing records.
I have an inkling that RJ Melendez would have done well as a member of this year's team. I always thought he was a good cutter, put-back guy, and did well when the ball was moving and he could read the defense during our offensive sets. I see similarities between his and Guerrier's playing styles, although Guerrier is the stronger rebounder, can defend a center, and shoots much better from behind the three point line.
Hope the Illini get sent to Brooklyn for the subregional, so I can see them live for a second time!
This year's team has been much, much more satisfying to watch than last year's. The main difference for me has been the way Domask has balanced the strengths of Hawkins and Shannon.
We had already seen that the latter two were marquee players. Hope to be watching those guys in the NBA.
I suspect that Hawkins' improved shooting numbers owe something--beyond the shots he put up at Ubben and the new, relaxed mindset--to Domask absorbing pressure, allowing Hawkins to play freer, take fewer shots at the last seconds of the shot clock, and create less for himself on the perimeter.
We have won a number of games by giving the ball to Domask in clutch moments. Mike LaTulip commented a year ago that a go-to offensive player wasn't necessarily essential beyond possibly being a decoy. His point was that anyone could take a big shot. I love the idea in theory, however I remember how many games the Bulls won because they put the ball in Michael Jordan's hands in clutch moments and the other team didn't have Michael Jordan.
In my opinion, our best clutch bucket-getter last year turned out to be Jayden Epps. I am happy to continue to root for the departed guys and see him and Skyy Clark landing premier roles and scoring a lot at Georgetown and Louisville, albeit their point totals are accompanied by low field goal percentages and losing records.
I have an inkling that RJ Melendez would have done well as a member of this year's team. I always thought he was a good cutter, put-back guy, and did well when the ball was moving and he could read the defense during our offensive sets. I see similarities between his and Guerrier's playing styles, although Guerrier is the stronger rebounder, can defend a center, and shoots much better from behind the three point line.
Hope the Illini get sent to Brooklyn for the subregional, so I can see them live for a second time!
Underwood is a very effective recruiter, and that is probably the most important single attribute in coaching success. If by 'coaching' we mean 'teaching' and 'improving player performance' then recruiting is not part of coaching. But if we mean 'coach that wins' -- and in college, unlike HS or NBA, the coach IS the recruiter/NBA front office executive -- then I think Coach Underwood deserves to be Coach of the Year ONE of these years! His record is better than his peers over the last 5 (?) years I believe. That is not luck.
And CONGRATULATIONS to our guys on All League teams: so proud of them!