Bowl/Playoff Selections

Status
Not open for further replies.
#76      
what FSU should do is remain silent til 2 days before their bowl game then inform ncaa that their players have opted out of the bowl game.
That would be especially funny since the CFP isn't an NCAA event.
 
#77      
If the committee left out FSU because of their injured quarterback why didn’t they knock them down in rankings before this weekend? I believe they stayed at #4 since the QB was injured 2 weeks ago. So it makes no sense to apply that rationale now.
 
#78      

TentakilRex

Land O Insects between Quincy-Macomb-Jacksonville

How is JMU going to a bowl? The NCAA said they weren’t eligible. I am confused

Also looks like a 5-7 Minnesota is going to Detroit for a bowl

Turns if there wasn't enough bowl eligible 6+ win teams, they and Jacksonville State got like the 5 win teams did (without the academic score).
 
#79      

JJE

Bethalto, IL
My gut says this type of decision making is just the tip of the iceberg and this kind of decision making won't be good for the likes of Illinois. While illinois will likely never sniff the playoffs, the committee was willing to exclude undefeated FSU (flawed) team.

Apples and oranges, but the BIG is talking about not having all the teams play in the conference tournament.

While it's good to be in the BIG and SEC, it wouldn't shock me if the bottom feaders in these conferences get pushed around in the near future. I'm not sure these conferences would be gutsy enough to kick a school out, but it wouldn't shock me if they did 5-10 years down the line.
 
#80      
No no, I get conference pride, but because of Connor Stalions and company, rooting for the Wolverines is like rooting for Astros after their cheating scandal! It is not an option!
Oh I have no conference pride…I don’t necessarily root FOR the teams that are playing B1G teams…I just root against our hated rivals and D-bag programs. (Like Michigan)

That being said, I’m super conflicted. I work in the heart of Bama country and their fans (many of my coworkers) are so freaking entitled. Talking about making major changes after 10/11 win seasons where they don’t make the playoffs.

Puke. They were all ready to haul Saban off until that miracle throw in the iron bowl. They don't deserve a team in the playoffs.

Now I have to freaking hear about this for the next month. Thank goodness for the Christmas break. I will say that I can’t wait to be the dissenting voice in their crimson echo chamber these next few weeks.

All that to say, I wish both Bama and UM could somehow lose.
 
#83      
Imagine if Tom Brady got hurt in game 14 of the 2007 NFL season but the Patriots still went 16-0. Then the NFL decided to give the 13-3 Colts the #1 seed instead because they still had their QB even though their record was worse.

Except for the fact that the NFL doesn't use a committee to decide who makes the playoffs.
 
#85      
Sure, because using a committee to decide playoffs is and always was idiotic. Make rules and tiebreakers that are clear and applied uniformly, full stop.
Yup.

The moment they decided to make this little mini tournament, they needed to change their SOP on how teams get in.

The decision today is an obvious money > performance example of where college football is going.

Woot.
 
Last edited:
#86      
Except for the fact that the NFL doesn't use a committee to decide who makes the playoffs.

The difference in variance between the selection committee arguing back and forth and best seeding based on final record is probably not that significant to be honest, specially in the case of a best of one format.
 
#87      

sacraig

The desert
Yup.

The moment they decided to make this little mini tournament, they needed to change their SOP on how teams get in.

The decision today is an obvious money > performance example of where college football is going.

Woot.
It really isn't, though. Next year we literally start an expanded playoff that has much more clear rules about who gets in (even if it is still inherently partially subjective due to the size of the field of teams in FBS). As long as they follow their own rules, it should be a lot more clear who gets in and why.
 
#89      
It really isn't, though. Next year we literally start an expanded playoff that has much more clear rules about who gets in (even if it is still inherently partially subjective due to the size of the field of teams in FBS). As long as they follow their own rules, it should be a lot more clear who gets in and why.

We will just be debating the non-automatic qualifiers instead. And it will be the same schools year after year too.

This just makes the 1 loss not conference champs in the playoff loophole more inclusive... to schools that are already borderline playoff teams most years.
 
#90      

Epsilon

M tipping over
Pdx
Believe it has to do with highest G6 team getting an auto invite, so to speak, to a NY6 game.
Understood, but Ole Miss is a more appropriate matchup for Liberty than U of O. The ducks should either be in the Peach Bowl against PSU or in the Cotton Bowl playing tOSU or Miznoz.

Except the Orange Bowl, all the New Year’s Six Bowl Games state “at large” for the bids, but is there still some old legacy alliances in the background in those decisions?

All that said, if Bo Nix decides not to play, it could be a long day for the ducks no matter who they play.
 
#91      
It really isn't, though. Next year we literally start an expanded playoff that has much more clear rules about who gets in (even if it is still inherently partially subjective due to the size of the field of teams in FBS). As long as they follow their own rules, it should be a lot more clear who gets in and why.

Disagree, it just moves the cutoff line down the number scale a few spots.

Let’s hope we never get FSU’d while having a once in a decade+ season and are right on the edge of CFP qualification…leaving it in the hands of people with subjective agendas.
 
#92      

Epsilon

M tipping over
Pdx
It really isn't, though. Next year we literally start an expanded playoff that has much more clear rules about who gets in (even if it is still inherently partially subjective due to the size of the field of teams in FBS). As long as they follow their own rules, it should be a lot more clear who gets in and why.
At least when there are 12 teams that get in, it’s hard to argue for any 13th ranked team that they truly deserve to be in for national championship contention. But someone somewhere somehow will complain.

Edit: looks like we already have some home-grown complaining on principle…
 
#94      
Turns if there wasn't enough bowl eligible 6+ win teams, they and Jacksonville State got like the 5 win teams did (without the academic score).
I understand that but the NCAA said they weren’t eligible because they haven’t been in the bowl division long enough. So if their wins didn’t make them eligible they shouldn’t be allowed in by the NCAA logic

I am happy they got in the bowl game but still confused. It is like saying you aren’t bowl eligible but on second thought there is no one else
 
#95      

Illini4Chief

TENNESSEE
Indianapolis Police reported the theft of over 125 street signs in downtown Indy, prior to the kick off with Michigan.....sources say it was The Michigan fans who were the sign stealers.
 
#96      
Understood, but Ole Miss is a more appropriate matchup for Liberty than U of O. The ducks should either be in the Peach Bowl against PSU or in the Cotton Bowl playing tOSU or Miznoz.

Except the Orange Bowl, all the New Year’s Six Bowl Games state “at large” for the bids, but is there still some old legacy alliances in the background in those decisions?

All that said, if Bo Nix decides not to play, it could be a long day for the ducks no matter who they play.
Ah, I misunderstood what you were getting at. My bad.
 
#97      
If I am FSU I would not want to play that game. What is the point you win it means nothing you lose it justifies people saying we told you so. FSU won’t opt out because of the money.

To me the argument the committee used was weak. And f you go by the eye test you could have said O$U since their only lose is to the number 1 team on the road and they beat ND at ND. UT dismantle Okla St but they aren’t as good as Louisville. Bama struggled against Auburn and USF this year. Winning the game matters not how dominant you appear to be
Nah. If you're FSU, you play the game. You hope Alabama ekes by Michigan and Texas edges Washington. Then go out there and obliterate Georgia by as much as you can. You do that and then immediately after the game you declare yourself National Champion and the only team worthy of that title. You furthermore call the so-called Championship game a farce as it doesn't even include the best and only undefeated team in college football and that whoever wins is a paper tiger. And then tell the AP pollsters to vote them #1 and rightfully award them the Natty and right this colossal wrong.

If that situation were to hold (and quite frankly it's not that farfetched other than FSU blowing out Georgia), I think there's decent odds FSU gets itself a shared national championship. FSU has an opportunity here- in no way should they throw it away out of spite.
 
#98      

sacraig

The desert
Disagree, it just moves the cutoff line down the number scale a few spots.

Let’s hope we never get FSU’d while having a once in a decade+ season and are right on the edge of CFP qualification…leaving it in the hands of people with subjective agendas.
If we go undefeated and win the B1G, we can't get FSUed under the new system. And if we aren't in that situation, then it's not getting FSUed.
 
#100      
If we go undefeated and win the B1G, we can't get FSUed under the new system. And if we aren't in that situation, then it's not getting FSUed.
We’re flying past each other due to semantics.

I’m not arguing that the term I just made up, being “FSU’d”, describes a team in FSU’s exact circumstances.

Im saying it’s being screwed out of a spot at the table due to subjective criteria.

Obviously if we go undefeated in the B1G and win the conference championship we wouldn’t be left out.

The situation I was thinking of was more us hypothetically being 11-1 at the end of the season, somehow missing the conference championship game, and being ranked 11th-ish going into the conference championship week.

There will be teams in those positions every year, and it is now very clear (to me) how those last coveted spots will be filled.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.