Bracketology

Status
Not open for further replies.
#526      
Had to chuckle at myself just a little bit.
Saw that the Bracket Matrix had updated for today and we went from being on 5 brackets to 10. Double ! Woo hoo.
Then I realized that a part of that was the expansion of their universe from 98 brackets to 113. Can't get too excited when 9% of those polled have us in.
More work to do.

Not sure how they operate the site, but I doubt all 113 brackets have been updated to include last weekend's games.

I expect that number to increase over the next couple days.
 
#527      
Not sure how they operate the site, but I doubt all 113 brackets have been updated to include last weekend's games.

I expect that number to increase over the next couple days.

You're right about that. They show the bracket's most recent update and I would just eyeball it as half have updated since yesterday, half have not.
 
#528      

UofIChE06

Pittsburgh
Not sure how they operate the site, but I doubt all 113 brackets have been updated to include last weekend's games.

I expect that number to increase over the next couple days.

UI is on 9 of 50 brackets released today. 1 of 63 prior to today.
 
#529      
I agree the bubble is weak, but there are ZERO marquee wins to our credit. Not saying that we can't get into the tournament, but the committee is looking for those big wins that we simply don't compare to.

The resume between Illinois and Northwestern skews in NU's favor (for now). Those wins @Wisconsin and neutral vs. Dayton are pretty big right now.
 
#530      
You're right about that. They show the bracket's most recent update and I would just eyeball it as half have updated since yesterday, half have not.

UI is on 9 of 50 brackets released today. 1 of 63 prior to today.

That most likely projects us ahead of TCU and probably KSU in the First Four Out group heading into our MSU game.

I'm starting to feel real good about our chances assuming we win out and avoid an upset in the BTT.
 
#531      
I agree the bubble is weak, but there are ZERO marquee wins to our credit. Not saying that we can't get into the tournament, but the committee is looking for those big wins that we simply don't compare to.

The resume between Illinois and Northwestern skews in NU's favor (for now). Those wins @Wisconsin and neutral vs. Dayton are pretty big right now.

NW's win over Dayton is a wash with Illinios's over VCU.

Not that it really matters, NW is not the last one in. They aren't who we care about at this moment. We probably want NW to turn it around and preserve our top 50 wins.

The committee does like marquee wins, but it also really likes good SOS and not losing to horrible teams. Those two are things that go in our favor.
 
#532      
The Illini are doing fairly well on the most recently updated brackets. After clicking on the recently updated ones that don't have us in yet, most of them had the Illini in the first four. The Illini are firmly in the 15-20 teams that straddle the cut line. If they can beat MSU they will enter a lot of brackets.
 
#533      
Yep. Look no further than our 2012-13 season. We finished 8-10 in the B1G, Iowa finished 9-9 and beat us in our only matchup. We ended up as a 7 seed in the NCAA, Iowa was a 3 seed in the NIT. Only thing that matters is strength of your victories and losses. Conference standings don't mean anything, as should be the case, especially today with the unbalanced schedules.

Quality of losses matter as well
 
#534      
Can't wait to hear the outsiders trash us after we make the tournament, and Cal doesn't. So we go on to dismiss Groce and hire the Cal coach as our next coach.

But....but...the 14th winningest program ever with the most tourney wins without a title needs to "know their place."
 
#535      

danielb927

Orange Krush Class of 2013
Rochester, MN
Here's Illinois' current Big Ten Tourney projection from my season simulator:

SEED
7 - 12%
8 - 24%
9 - 42%
10 - 12%
11 - 6%
12 - 4%
13 - 1%

This is based on KenPom, where our chance of winning out is something like 30%, so we clearly need help to get the 7 seed even if we win out. Specifically, Iowa loses at least once (highly likely) and Northwestern loses out (around 25%)

Chance of seeing team X in the second round (our first game, if we get a single-bye)
Iowa - 45%
Michigan - 17%
PSU - 11%
Northwestern -11%
Neb - 5%
Minny - 3%
OSU - 3%
IU - 2%
MD - 2%
Wisc. - 1-in-700

Chance of having team Y as the double-bye team in our bracket section:
Purdue - 64%
Wisconsin - 21%
MSU - 5%
Minny - 5%
MD - 4%
UM - 1-in-500
NW - 1-in-2000
 
#537      
For those using the Dance card site, I would caution anyone who looks at that 95% prediction rate they boast as an indication of how good they are.

Anyone could get most of the bids right simply because so many of the at-large teams have excellent resumes. The bracket matrix will likely miss 1 or none. The closer you are to the spot where the bubble bursts, the less reliable any tool is going to be. So a team 8 spots above the cut-off, you could have pretty good confidence. But 1 slot in would be more like 50-50. This looks like a year where the size of the bubble could be crucial for our chances.
 
#538      

danielb927

Orange Krush Class of 2013
Rochester, MN
I went ahead and ran things just for scenarios where we win out. Here's what that looks like (summary: it's more Nebraska-y/tOSU-y and less Michigan-y/Northwestern-y).

SEED
7 - 35%
8 - 57%
9 - 8%

2ND ROUND OPPONENT
Iowa - 48%
Neb. - 16%
PSU - 13%
tOSU - 8%
IU - 6%
UM - 6%
NW - 3%

DOUBLE BYE IN BRACKET SECTION
Purdue - 61%
UW - 33%
Minny - 6%
Maryland/MSU - 1-in-2000 (each)
 
#539      

haasi

New York
For those using the Dance card site, I would caution anyone who looks at that 95% prediction rate they boast as an indication of how good they are.

we were like #70 on dance card last week with 0% chance of making it. now 44 with a 75% chance of making it? No, not reliable.

I think dance card had closer to 100% record years ago, which led to the idea that it had the secret sauce, but it hasn't been that accurate on the tough calls in past years.
 
#540      
Can't wait to hear the outsiders trash us after we make the tournament, and Cal doesn't. So we go on to dismiss Groce and hire the Cal coach as our next coach.

But....but...the 14th winningest program ever with the most tourney wins without a title needs to "know their place."

We still need to win. I wouldn't count this as in the bag.

Beating Michigan State is our best chance and I am not sure I would count that as in the bag.
 
#541      

Jkat00

Champaign, IL
Will it? They were a dumpster fire the last time we played them.

And then beat IU at home and Maryland on the road. Iowa has a talented core of freshman that are hit or miss. Always tough to beat a team 3 times.
 
#543      
I feel like all these Illini are in predictions are click-bait for our large fanbase. Much fewer clicks for making the same prediction for Bucknell, TCU or Georgia.
 
#544      
We still need to win. I wouldn't count this as in the bag.

Beating Michigan State is our best chance and I am not sure I would count that as in the bag.

Wednesday is basically season defining. In and we are basically in. Unlikely to crap out at Rutgers. Lose Wednesday and zero chance.
 
#545      

robertgoulet

IL Board Resident Crooner
Austin, TX
Brad Evans on WSCR right now. Said if IL beats MSU and Rutgers and gets 1-2 wins in B1G tourney they should be in.
 
Last edited:
#546      
Updated Dance Card has us 5 spots ABOVE the bubble line after taking into account yesterday's games. And 3 spots below NW . . .

"In addition to the Dance Card value and ranking, also shown is the probability that a team with the same profile would have gotten an at-large bid in past years, if today was Selection Sunday." Ill is listed at 75% now

http://www.unf.edu/~jcoleman/dance.htm



Man, move us up one spot and the % jumps up to 99%


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
#547      
Brad Evans on WSCR right now. Said if IL beats MSU and Rutgers and gets 1-2 wins in B1G tourney they should be in.

Honestly he's saying beat MSU and maybe Purdue and have no bad losses we're in? That's not really going out on a limb. If we beat MSU on Wednesday (a 50/50 thing at best i'd say), I really don't know if I like the prospects of a must-win 8/9 game with Iowa/NW and maybe needing a Purdue victory to clinch. I don't see that happening at all.
 
#548      

mhuml32

Cincinnati, OH
More important game: Michigan State on Wednesday or second Illinois game in BTT?
 
#549      
we were like #70 on dance card last week with 0% chance of making it. now 44 with a 75% chance of making it? No, not reliable.
From the site, emphasis mine:
In addition to the Dance Card value and ranking, also shown is the probability that a team with the same profile would have gotten an at-large bid in past years, if today was Selection Sunday.
The site isn't attempting to predict based on the rest of the season. This is why Vanderbilt (16-13) is currently at 99.99% although they still have to play at Kentucky and host Florida.
 
#550      

TEYPAY

Springfield
More important game: Michigan State on Wednesday or second Illinois game in BTT?

Michigan St -- if we don't win that one, then the important game in the BTT would be the 3rd game... :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.