Lunardi's bracket sure is nice for us.
I'd take that draw right now. Screw the 3 seed.Lunardi's bracket sure is nice for us.
Of course not. Don't be silly.If Wisconsin went 8-23 would they still be a 6 seed? Asking for a friend.
Nebraska is a 9 seed in the east.Ouch though for Nebraska, they are not even one of his first four out.
Alright here’s my bracket-obsessive take - we need to root for Tennessee to win and North Carolina to lose in their respective conference tourneys. Right now, bracketologists are split between Tennessee and North Carolina are the last 1 seed. I’d argue that that we’d much rather play either of them in the S16 than Houston or UConn based on Kenpom rankings. If Tennessee has a good SEC tourney run and solidifies their 1 seed standing, NONE of the other projected 4 seeds (Kentucky, Alabama, and Auburn) can play in Tennessee’s bracket because they’re in the same conference. So we’d get the most favorable 4 seed regardless of our BTT outcome. If North Carolina gets the 1 seed, any of the 4 seeds can play them in the S16 and we’d likely need to jump Kentucky to make sure we’re the first ranked 4 seed to avoid Houston/UConn.
I got confused for a moment too, because the conference breakdown says 5 B10 teams, but there are 6.Nebraska is a 9 seed in the east.
And now if they get hammered in their first B12 tournament game, the committee will take that (HD and McCullars) into consideration and still seed them #3.I think KU is the one that is overrated by the bracket experts. The metrics (NET included) and pollsters both have them in the 5 seed range yet they've appeared to be cemented as a 3 in the brackets.
I will just be very happy when The Fighting Illini are playing against any #1 seed. I don't care which one it is. I'll take it.Alright here’s my bracket-obsessive take - we need to root for Tennessee to win and North Carolina to lose in their respective conference tourneys. Right now, bracketologists are split between Tennessee and North Carolina are the last 1 seed. I’d argue that that we’d much rather play either of them in the S16 than Houston or UConn based on Kenpom rankings. If Tennessee has a good SEC tourney run and solidifies their 1 seed standing, NONE of the other projected 4 seeds (Kentucky, Alabama, and Auburn) can play in Tennessee’s bracket because they’re in the same conference. So we’d get the most favorable 4 seed regardless of our BTT outcome. If North Carolina gets the 1 seed, any of the 4 seeds can play them in the S16 and we’d likely need to jump Kentucky to make sure we’re the first ranked 4 seed to avoid Houston/UConn.
I'd like it better if they were playing the seed as a 3 seed.I will just be very happy when The Fighting Illini are playing against any #1 seed. I don't care which one it is. I'll take it.
He’s had it that way for a couple days. I was trying to figure out who dropped out. His mistake.I got confused for a moment too, because the conference breakdown says 5 B10 teams, but there are 6.
Alright here’s my bracket-obsessive take - we need to root for Tennessee to win and North Carolina to lose in their respective conference tourneys. Right now, bracketologists are split between Tennessee and North Carolina are the last 1 seed. I’d argue that that we’d much rather play either of them in the S16 than Houston or UConn based on Kenpom rankings. If Tennessee has a good SEC tourney run and solidifies their 1 seed standing, NONE of the other projected 4 seeds (Kentucky, Alabama, and Auburn) can play in Tennessee’s bracket because they’re in the same conference. So we’d get the most favorable 4 seed regardless of our BTT outcome. If North Carolina gets the 1 seed, any of the 4 seeds can play them in the S16 and we’d likely need to jump Kentucky to make sure we’re the first ranked 4 seed to avoid Houston/UConn.
NCAA RULES said:Conference teams shall not meet prior to the regional final unless a ninth team is selected from a conference. If the committee is unable to reconcile the bracket after exhausting all reasonable options, it has the flexibility to waive this principle to permit two teams from the same conference to meet each other after the second round.
This post is ELITEI'd like it better if they were playing the seed as a 3 seed.
Didn’t know where to put it, but Illinois #13 overall seed according to Lunardi.
CBS right now has us as a 4 seed facing 13 seed Samford. Samford is very good.It's going to be so key to stay as the top overall #4 seed. Staying out of Spokane is huge.
I also wouldn't mind seeing Auburn fall. Just because.The Bracket Matrix as of yesterday (i.e., did not factor in the Quad 1 Iowa win) had us as the third #4 seed. Here are the conference tournament matchups for our fellow competitors for the #3 and #4 seed spots (in order of the current seed line on that site and then using NET Rankings).
#3 SEEDS
#14 Baylor - vs. #18 Kansas (Q1), #41 Cincinnati (Q1) or #158 West Virginia (Q3). Then likely vs. #9 Iowa State (Q1).
#11 Creighton - vs. #64 Providence (Q2) or #198 Georgetown (Q3). Then likely vs. #13 Marquette (Q1).
#10 Duke - vs. #79 Syracuse (Q2), #80 NC State (Q2) or #214 Louisville (Q4). Then likely vs. #51 Virginia (Q2).
#18 Kansas - vs. #41 Cincinnati (Q1) or #158 West Virginia (Q3). Then vs. #14 Baylor (Q1). Then likely vs. #9 Iowa State (Q1).
#4 SEEDS
#19 Kentucky - vs. #46 Texas A&M (Q1) or #90 Ole Miss (Q2). Then likely vs. #8 Alabama (Q1).
#8 Alabama - vs. #35 Florida (Q1), #101 Georgia (Q3) or #156 Missouri (Q3). Then likely vs. #8 Kentucky (Q1).
#15 ILLINOIS - vs. #60 Iowa (Q2) or #54 Ohio State (Q2). Then likely vs. #37 Nebraska (Q1).
#6 Auburn - vs. #49 South Carolina (Q1), #109 Arkansas (Q3) or #203 Vanderbilt (Q4). Then likely vs. #5 Tennessee (Q1).
This is why the "screw the rest of the conference!" attitude some fans have is very misguided. Sure, if you're 2005 Illinois or this year's Purdue and you are just winning every game, strength of the conference will not matter. However, if you are having a #3/4 seed-type season, the strength or weakness of the conference is important. Some of these schools have multiple Q1 opportunities coming up if they keep winning.
Anyway, I think it will be more fun for me to watch everything if I have a rooting interest going in, and I imagine others agree! So this is what we should pull for:
1. Early round upsets of all kinds. Using KU as an example, a loss to Cincinnati (Q1) COULD allow us to jump them if we win two in the BTT ... but a KU loss to West Virginia (Q3), however unlikely, would definitely do the trick! Additionally, even if KU didn't beat WVU, the win would be relatively meaningless.
2. Duke and Kansas to specifically lose. They seem the most realistic to jump, and the losses they'd incur look worse than what the SEC teams would have.
CBS right now has us as a 4 seed facing 13 seed Samford. Samford is very good.
CBS right now has us as a 4 seed facing 13 seed Samford. Samford is very good.
Unlikely we get Samford if we stay as the #13 overall seed. You would likely get the worst 13 which is Vermont as of now.
I wonder how the big12 will shake out as well. A lot of teams in the 1-2-3 lines, wonder if they have to move them up/downAlright here’s my bracket-obsessive take - we need to root for Tennessee to win and North Carolina to lose in their respective conference tourneys. Right now, bracketologists are split between Tennessee and North Carolina are the last 1 seed. I’d argue that that we’d much rather play either of them in the S16 than Houston or UConn based on Kenpom rankings. If Tennessee has a good SEC tourney run and solidifies their 1 seed standing, NONE of the other projected 4 seeds (Kentucky, Alabama, and Auburn) can play in Tennessee’s bracket because they’re in the same conference. So we’d get the most favorable 4 seed regardless of our BTT outcome. If North Carolina gets the 1 seed, any of the 4 seeds can play them in the S16 and we’d likely need to jump Kentucky to make sure we’re the first ranked 4 seed to avoid Houston/UConn.