Coaching Carousel (Basketball)

Status
Not open for further replies.
#76      
How does K State have that much more in NIL than us? I know they're not a poverty program, but I just feel like we're (were) on a different tier than them...? No intel on this, just gut feeling of course.
I got a family member being recruited by Kstate and Illinois. Kstate does not have more NIL than Illinois in Football or Basketball. Kstate not even in the top half of The Big 12 in NIL . Source for Kstate has more NIL money than Illinois is trust me bro. KSTATE doesn’t even have more NIL money than Iowa State, Baylor, Houston, Arizona, Texas Tech, Kansas, BYU , West Virginia
 
#77      
That, of course, begs the question of whether he is actually worth $900k per year. He's obviously a great recruiter, but if that doesn't translate into results, what good is it? He's been great at coaching big men, but is that worth that kind of money or should we be devoting more of our finite-sized pie to a coach or coaches that understand offense and defense?
I like you am not sure if he is worth that much money, but he is key to some really good recruits so if he a new coach wants the extra help with recruits so be it but we need to increase the price pool for the other assistants. Honestly, I would be fine with TA coming back. I just want coaches running the offense and defense that know what they are doing.
 
#78      
I like you am not sure if he is worth that much money, but he is key to some really good recruits so if he a new coach wants the extra help with recruits so be it but we need to increase the price pool for the other assistants. Honestly, I would be fine with TA coming back. I just want coaches running the offense and defense that know what they are doing.
According to my sources Tim Anderson is Gone Gone and not coming back to Illinois no matter what.
 
#79      
this cycle is going to be massive. I just don’t want to be the program without a chair when the music stops.

What could possibly go wrong?

GIF by Demic
 
#80      
Ayo's last year as the one seed felt a lot like 05. We had several things that rallied the team together, from Ayo's injury to Michigan getting gifted the B1G title, and winning the B1G Championship. It was all peaking at the right moment.

To then get meticulously torn apart like a cat playing with a mouse was just brutal to watch. We had no answer. I truly believe Brad just thought we'd out-athlete them or out-talent them, but then the game ended and we never adjust.

I wasn't that upset then, Loyola was good. They just outplayed us. But now we continue to see the lack of adjustments and I don't know if it will ever change.
 
#81      
Or that he is just doing his due diligence.
Or that he sees the writing on the wall with donors here or Whitman or something and is keeping his options open.
I wonder if this would be the wild card that could really swing things? As a non-insider, I wonder how much influence big donors/boosters have on this stuff these day.

It would seem that, hypothetically, if some of the bigger donors are just fed up with Brad, and if they were to throw their weight around with big-time NIL as leverage, Whitman might possibly be faced with a decision: Does he keep Brad but have less NIL to work with to get players, or you let Brad go to a new school (still seems incredibly unlikely that he's outright fired) and try to get a coach with at least similar abilities but now also have assurances of much more NIL to work with?
 
#82      
Letting him go ??? Don’t think that would happen …

Not begging him to stay ??? Think that could happen …
Yes sorry I wasn’t clear, glad we’re on the same page here.

I think tournament success is a fickle beast. And while I understand that is THE measuring stick for top tier CBB programs, I think two statements can be true: BU’s tenure here has elevated expectations, brought good players, and won conference championships. BU has significantly underperformed in the tournament.

At some point, the latter cannot continue to happen at the rate it has, ignoring any sort of specific excuses you can come up with.

That being said, I’m very weary of us being able to replace BU with a coach that could outperform what BU has done. Maybe it’s easier now given the groundwork BU has put in place, and like I said previously I have the utmost confidence in Whitman, but someone’s the devil you know is really the better option.

Give me another year of Brad before we start having any real conversations about his job here.
 
#83      
I have ultimate confidence in Josh, while I don’t know how hard he’ll fight to retain BU, regardless of how this year ends, I’m just bullish on Illini basketball.

I still think letting BU go under most circumstances is neither a good look or ideal for the program.

this cycle is going to be massive. I just don’t want to be the program without a chair when the music stops.
No one is letting him go.. he is the one looking for a new dance partner presumably. Which has happened each of the last few years excluding the E8 year. Josh will not beg Brad to stay or pay more that trick has been used one to many times.

I have said before I have no issue with Brad being head coach but the support staff needs an overhaul and I do not see him firing Tyler like he should.
 
#84      
Letting him go ??? Don’t think that would happen …

Not begging him to stay ??? Think that could happen …
If I'm betting, this is where I think Whitman is right now.

It would be incredibly ballsy - but not overly surprising - for Underwood to have pretty significant collapses two of the last three years, have very legitimate questions about whether he can achieve consistently without a top-notch dynamic duo (Ayo/Kofi, then TSJ/Domask) on his roster, and then meet with Whitman like everything would be totally simpatico and that Whitman should just blindly match any competing offer that may come across the table. Quite honestly, I don't think he doesn't have that type of capital to spend right now. I'd say Whitman would hold the leverage in this situaiton given the results of the last three seasons.

In other words, Whitman should be in the driver's seat for any discussions here. If we were looking at a three year stretch with two Elite 8s and had the team had a season like St. John's is currently having right now (they came to mind after watching their game on DVR against UConn yesterday), maybe Underwood has more leverage. But if I'm the AD, I'm not exactly sitting back letting Underwood dictate to me when looking at the context of the last three seasons.
 
#85      
No one is letting him go.. he is the one looking for a new dance partner presumably. Which has happened each of the last few years excluding the E8 year. Josh will not beg Brad to stay or pay more that trick has been used one to many times.

I have said before I have no issue with Brad being head coach but the support staff needs an overhaul and I do not see him firing Tyler like he should.
Or demoting him for that matter…😉
 
#86      
This is very true. To put in perspective, we had Ayo, Kofi, and TSJ (Ayo and Kofi at same time for one run), and we only have one second weekend tourney appearance. It is quite remarkable to have three jerseys placed in the rafters and only one trip out of the first weekend. Have to think with some better x's and o's we at least have two to three deeper runs.

Add in the fact that we have been blown out the last 2.5 games and have largely underperformed in 2025, there is just anger surrounding the program.

Don't get me wrong, B1G banners being hung are a big deal, but we are paying for so much more than that. The E8 game last year left a sour taste in my mouth (but did not take away from the happiness of getting over the first weekend hump), and this season is even worse. It is not the wins and losses that are frustrating, but the way it is happening. Illness are a convenient excuse. Everyone saw what transpired since the 2nd half MSU. There is something seriously wrong with the system. I am hopeful it can be addressed through coaching changes, but I am skeptical that Brad is willing to push out his own son...one reason why I think he would take a new job this offseason.
We got a #1 seed... and lost in the second round to Loyola Chicago, which had a far lower talent level than we did.

And I don't buy the "Loyola was under seeded" nonsense. We were a 1 seed. In theory, that means the only under seeded team we shouldn't still beat more often than not is one that got like a 2 or 3 but deserved a 1.

We got beat handily by a team that was worse than us considerably on paper but out-schemed us.
 
#87      
To be honest, it’s not a bad business decision by BU for the same reasons we wouldn’t want to wait until the program completely derails. If he starts losing donor support and can’t secure NIL funding, he could reach a point where other programs wouldn’t want to touch him.
I could see a key reason he may leave because he doesn't want to fire his kid! I wonder if Josh would tell him your son needs to go or be demoted. Hell, Brad could pay him.
 
#88      
I like you am not sure if he is worth that much money, but he is key to some really good recruits so if he a new coach wants the extra help with recruits so be it but we need to increase the price pool for the other assistants. Honestly, I would be fine with TA coming back. I just want coaches running the offense and defense that know what they are doing.
I think that's my question here (and I don't know the right answer). Is paying OA worth that much if we can't also have some good Xs and Os coaches? High-end players without a good strategy is AAU ball.
 
#89      
Ok, let’s take this one step further. If a bunch of these good jobs open up this round IU,UNC, Texas, MSU?, Tennessee?, etc. how does that affect JW’s urgency?

If Brad is back channeling a new job that puts JW in a rock and a hard place. You’re not going to fire Brad, but you can’t eliminate the possibility of him leaving, but you also can’t sit on your hands and see Beard, Wade, Miller, etc. slip through your hands while you wait.

I’m glad I don’t have to make those decisions. Keep Brad good, hire a new coach good, lose Brad and see these good coaches go elsewhere bad.
 
#90      
Or demoting him for that matter…😉
hamer is way more a problem than tyler.

there's nothing anybody or any coach could've done with this offense. shooting the ball is literally out of the question for your ENTIRE TEAM. that's just a total evaluation problem in recruiting. you don't fix that in game - you fix that in the offseason.

the defense needs total retooling - the scheme, the coaching, everything. it's awful.
 
Last edited:
#91      
I could see a key reason he may leave because he doesn't want to fire his kid! I wonder if Josh would tell him your son needs to go or be demoted. Hell, Brad could pay him.
I can't remember if he started or not, but didn't Tyler play some decent minutes at one time because, "he knew Brad's offense!?" :ROFLMAO:
 
#92      
These are the resumes of the 2 assistant coaches from the website. Can you imagine if this was the caliber of coach Bret was bringing in for OC and DC and then the football team was underperforming? I'd wager that there are multiple high school coaches within 100 miles of Champaign with better resumes, coaching experience, and X's and O's knowledge. To not bring in Wayne McClain types to run these operations is awful imo.

is in his first season as assistant coach after being elevated to the role on July 1, 2023. It is his fifth year overall with the Illini program, after spending his first two seasons as video coordinator followed by two years as assistant to the head coach....arrived at Illinois in the summer of 2019....He was an advance scout in 2019 after debuting as a coaching associate in 2018....handled opponent scouting, with a focus on defensive game planning, and created video playbooks.

is in his first season as assistant coach after being elevated to the role on July 1, 2023. It his third overall on the Fighting Illini staff after spending his first two seasons as director of recruiting and scouting.
 
#93      
Ok, let’s take this one step further. If a bunch of these good jobs open up this round IU,UNC, Texas, MSU?, Tennessee?, etc. how does that affect JW’s urgency?

If Brad is back channeling a new job that puts JW in a rock and a hard place. You’re not going to fire Brad, but you can’t eliminate the possibility of him leaving, but you also can’t sit on your hands and see Beard, Wade, Miller, etc. slip through your hands while you wait.

I’m glad I don’t have to make those decisions. Keep Brad good, hire a new coach good, lose Brad and see these good coaches go elsewhere bad.
At least some of those big jobs will make a stupid hire. No one bats 1.000. Hopefully IU is one of those. So there would still be good coaches around to nab.

Still, I don't think you can fire a coach like BU just because we think we would miss on other options. He's fresh off an Elite Eight and has really only had one bad season since the ship was righted (by him), and that season isn't even over yet. So I don't think he has earned getting canned and I think that may do more harm than good if other coaches view our expectations as unreasonable.

But like @Indy Illini Fan suggested, I don't think BU has done enough to command another raise or extension yet, so if he flirts with other programs and tries to get JW to pay up, I think it would be totally the right call for JW to play hard ball. BU has no leverage for more after a season like this and trying something like that would make him look bad, not JW/us.
 
#94      
hamer is way more a problem than tyler.

there's nothing anybody or any coach could've done with this offense. shooting the ball is just out of the question for your ENTIRE TEAM. that's just a total evaluation problem in recruiting. you don't fix that in game - you fix that in the offseason.

the defense needs total retooling - the scheme, the coaching, everything. it's awful.
That's probably at least slightly fair. And we actually shot reasonablt well well early in the season, including against good teams. The wheels just fell off around the new year. But that begs the question of why. Did they all just start slumping at the same time? Or did other teams catch onto our plan, learn how to defend it, and we didn't adjust?
 
#95      
At least some of those big jobs will make a stupid hire. No one bats 1.000. Hopefully IU is one of those. So there would still be good coaches around to nab.

Still, I don't think you can fire a coach like BU just because we think we would miss on other options. He's fresh off an Elite Eight and has really only had one bad season since the ship was righted (by him), and that season isn't even over yet. So I don't think he has earned getting canned and I think that may do more harm than good if other coaches view our expectations as unreasonable.

But like @Indy Illini Fan suggested, I don't think BU has done enough to command another raise or extension yet, so if he flirts with other programs and tries to get JW to pay up, I think it would be totally the right call for JW to play hard ball. BU has no leverage for more after a season like this and trying something like that would make him look bad, not JW/us.
I agree. My only concern would be Brad leaving after some of these coaches get hired by other schools.
 
#96      
If I'm betting, this is where I think Whitman is right now.

It would be incredibly ballsy - but not overly surprising - for Underwood to have pretty significant collapses two of the last three years, have very legitimate questions about whether he can achieve consistently without a top-notch dynamic duo (Ayo/Kofi, then TSJ/Domask) on his roster, and then meet with Whitman like everything would be totally simpatico and that Whitman should just blindly match any competing offer that may come across the table. Quite honestly, I don't think he doesn't have that type of capital to spend right now. I'd say Whitman would hold the leverage in this situaiton given the results of the last three seasons.

In other words, Whitman should be in the driver's seat for any discussions here. If we were looking at a three year stretch with two Elite 8s and had the team had a season like St. John's is currently having right now (they came to mind after watching their game on DVR against UConn yesterday), maybe Underwood has more leverage. But if I'm the AD, I'm not exactly sitting back letting Underwood dictate to me when looking at the context of the last three seasons.
Oof - English can be hard sometimes! :D

What I should have written was, "I don't think he has that type of capital to spend right now."
 
#97      
We got a #1 seed... and lost in the second round to Loyola Chicago, which had a far lower talent level than we did.

And I don't buy the "Loyola was under seeded" nonsense. We were a 1 seed. In theory, that means the only under seeded team we shouldn't still beat more often than not is one that got like a 2 or 3 but deserved a 1.

We got beat handily by a team that was worse than us considerably on paper but out-schemed us.
I think both can be true at the same time. Loyola could have easily been higher than an 8 seed, but it does not excuse the turd blossom game plan that Illinois came up with. That Illinois team was built to get to E8 at worst, so in theory, they would have had to go through Loyola at some point anyway. Maybe the team ran out of gas during that run, but any reasonable game plan should have easily gotten the Illini into the second weekend that year. The fact of the matter is that over the BU years, the Illini have been poorly coached in the NCAAT (last year included). Talent has generally won games more than coaching schemes in the BU era. That is a long term issue that I do not see getting corrected anytime soon, which really explains a lot about how the Illini teams have fizzled out in March more often than not.
 
#98      
I think both can be true at the same time. Loyola could have easily been higher than an 8 seed, but it does not excuse the turd blossom game plan that Illinois came up with. That Illinois team was built to get to E8 at worst, so in theory, they would have had to go through Loyola at some point anyway. Maybe the team ran out of gas during that run, but the game plan should have easily gotten the Illini into the second weekend that year. The fact of the matter is that over the BU years, the Illini have been poorly coached in the NCAAT (last year included). Talent has generally won games more than coaching schemes. That is a long term issue that I do not see getting corrected anytime soon, which really explains a lot about how the Illini teams have fizzled out in March more often than not.
To be clear, I buy that Loyola was criminally under-seeded. But unless you think they deserved a 1 or 2, then there is zero reason for us to lose that game other than a bad game plan.
 
#100      
I'm generally in the camp of BU has earned more time to right the ship. But the Loyola loss is squarely on him and will probably hang over his head forever unless he makes a Final Four. If I take my orange glasses off, what Moser did that game was one of the best coaching performances I've seen. That wasn't just a scrappy mid major who caught fire from three as often happens in tourney upsets. They knew exactly how they could hurt us. They inserted the knife and twisted it over and over and we looked more confused than anything.

Anyway, if we win that game, BU is pretty much on track. I've posted this before but every coach who has been here for 9+ years has made multiple S16's in their first 9 years. And this is how it breaks down by decade starting in the 80s:

80s: 4 S16
90s: 0 (sanctions)
00s: 4
10s: 0 (Inept leadership)
20s: 1

The way I see it, BU has one more year to get one more S16 and if he does that, then he gets four to make it to two. Longer leash than most here have for him but it just doesn't seem reasonable, IMO, to fire a guy for failing to do something that literally no one in our history has done - go to the 2nd weekend 5 times in a decade.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back