If that’s the exact order, I have no worries that Brad would end up in Austin. Even if Wade, Miller and Ivey said no, I’m pretty sure Snyder would say “yes, yes, a thousand times YES!!!”
Snyder does have a house in Austin …
If that’s the exact order, I have no worries that Brad would end up in Austin. Even if Wade, Miller and Ivey said no, I’m pretty sure Snyder would say “yes, yes, a thousand times YES!!!”
I think for Snyder-the bigger issue becomes if Texas wants to buy out his NBA contract
Nope, don't like this at all. There needs to be a minimum of 2 changes, in my opinion. Hamer & Kwa.
Here's my biggest question, and I'm guessing only the insiders will really be able to answer it - who drove the tactical changes on defense, particularly on how to defend ball screens?
If ANYONE on the staff had to step in and drive that change, then there is zero reason to retain Hamer. That's supposedly his baby. It's no different when you see a head coach step in and call plays in football, whether on defense or offense. If Hamer is the defensive game planner and someone else had to correct the issues, then there is no choice but to move on.
We have not been very good defensively all season. More than that, until the last several games there were no discernible adjustments to attempt to improve things. So if Underwood, Alexander, or Antigua came in and drove these changes (I'm assuming Tyler continued his work on the offense, but if he did have these ideas I'll give him credit), then what value does Hamer provide to the staff?
If Hamer was the one who drove these changes, I'll happily reconsider things. But I would be very surprised if that was the case. But, as I've said a lot on here, I've been wrong before and will be again.
Is Jay Wright talking to Brad again? lolBrad made the adjustments you’re seeing …
Along with some input inside the building and believe it or not, outside the building …
As they should. There is never any harm in gauging information about a high-tier job (even if they ultimately have no real interest in accepting the job) from their end.That information came from someone well connected with Texas … Those are the 5 names they’ve been focusing on …
My personal opinion, and just knowing all those guys … All 5 of them would listen …
Really? I'm kind of surprised. Not like he's turned the Hawks into a powerhouse, but they're currently in playoff contention, and he doesn't exactly have a superstar-laden roster to work with.I’ve heard he could be fired …
If they do move on from Ben (I agree, I think he's a good coach), wonder if they go after Nico Medved (CSU). He's put some pretty good teams on the floor without access to much in the way of resources. Lots of connections to Minnesota.It still boggles my mind that there would even be chatter surrounding Ben Johnson at Minnesota. I think he can flat out coach. Give the guy some resources and see what he can do.
I know coaches - particularly those who would rarely play each other - talk, so it's not overly surprising for me to hear that there may have been some outside influence.Brad made the adjustments you’re seeing …
Along with some input inside the building and believe it or not, outside the building …
Loyalty, duh.I know coaches - particularly those who would rarely play each other - talk, so it's not overly surprising for me to hear that there may have been some outside influence.
Now, exactly who that "outside the building" source was may very well surprise me (and I DO NOT expect an answer on this, as I know you want to protect sources). I'll just have some fun wondering who that might be.![]()
Really? I'm kind of surprised. Not like he's turned the Hawks into a powerhouse, but they're currently in playoff contention, and he doesn't exactly have a superstar-laden roster to work with.
Just catching up...
1. I hear Schertz on the radio quite a bit and he doesn't seem like a guy who would jump ship this quickly. I know...talk is cheap...money talks.
2. I would love to see English at Tennessee. If nothing else as a big FU to mizzery. Although I'm sure he isn't thinking that
3...
View attachment 40372
I know UCLA has been pretty consistently good under Cronin but I just don't see them as being really dangerous. They dont seem to be big NIL spenders despite what their history would suggest(too much other stuff going on in LA I guess).B10 is getting ridiculously competitive with 18 teams.
UCLA and Oregon are perennial top 20 teams.
For past 5 years Illinois, Purdue, Wisconsin and Michigan State have been all been in and out of top 10.
Michigan is greatly improved under May. Nebraska has improved significantly under Hoiberg.
Even Northwestern made NCAA multiple times.
The B10 and SEC TV contracts combined with large alumni base for NIL gives a financial base that is tough to beat.
Ben Johnson has only made one NIT in 3 years. He looks like at 15-16 he might make it again. The transfer portal and NBA early entry makes it tough to slow build.
I don't see any reason to give Ben a 5th year. There has been no upward trend and his recruiting has been mediocre. He need to lure Dain Dainja back to Minneapolis. It might be the NIL$ just are not there.
As of today, we only have one open spot …
Fran has his “jump before you’re pushed” opportunity.Steve Donahue out at Penn.
Fran has his “jump before you’re pushed” opportunity.
Would be curious if you're open to sharing (or hinting) at who from the outside may have driven that change.Brad made the adjustments you’re seeing …
Along with some input inside the building and believe it or not, outside the building …
At the end of the season there should be two openings at least!I share the same opinion …
But as of right now, we only have one opening …
Although I’m not an Underwood fan I don’t see him leaving Illinois for Texas . Texas is not a basketball school . Football is king in the state of Texas. Texas basketball is Kevin Durant the end.So does that mean all 5 candidates are also interested/have shown interest? Or just who Texas wants, not necessarily who they could get?