I can't like this enough.Is that Ravonte Rice I spy in the mural in the Rev's new office at Valpo? Serendipitous that they picked a game with the Illini....
for sureI would assume more schools will start to employ role like this?
Villanova hires former Quinnipiac head coach Baker Dunleavy as basketball GM | FOX Sports
Villanova is the latest school to follow a new trend in college basketball, hiring former Quinnipiac coach Baker Dunleavy as the general manager for men's and women's basketball.www.google.com
Does having the same person doing that for men's and women's serve the needs of the women's team?for sure
you need someone to handle the constant movement of players with the portal and NIL money issues
There are two revenue producing programs.every revenue producing program is going to need a "GM" that will basically answer to the coach and to some extent, to the AD - that will be the only difference from the current "pro" sports structure
If there is going to be this much player movement, I think the first thing basketball staffs need is a much, much bigger "analyst" staff to scout tape.every revenue producing program is going to need a "GM" that will basically answer to the coach and to some extent, to the AD - that will be the only difference from the current "pro" sports structure
I just posted a link on the NIL thread. Villanova just hired a basketball General Manager.Basketball teams need to hire an assistant coach to be the Recruiting Coordinator as a staff member to review the Transfer Portal, as well as coordinate on campus recruiting visits.
@IlliniShelt beat you by a few hoursI just posted a link on the NIL thread. Villanova just hired a basketball General Manager.
I agree . . . I see no path forward for school affiliation with so much money floating around, with more coming in like the atmospheric rivers in CA.every revenue producing program is going to need a "GM" that will basically answer to the coach and to some extent, to the AD - that will be the only difference from the current "pro" sports structure
I get what you’re saying but if it was going to die out as a less than premium product to the NBA why wouldn’t it have done that already? To me, I don’t think that many people view the product differently now that kids are getting paid & it’s allowed. Will there be more roster turnover? Sure, but the fans of college basketball have school affiliation. Do I love having players I can watch grow and develop for multiple years? Yes, but more than that I’m an Illinois fan and I was during the John Groce era when I wasn’t a fan of our rosters some years.I agree . . . I see no path forward for school affiliation with so much money floating around, with more coming in like the atmospheric rivers in CA.
Without school affiliation, does the sport just die out as a less than premium product when compared to the NBA?
It didn't die out as a less than premium product because it was "college" basketball, and had a built in audience of millions consisting of alumni, die hard fans, and casual fans, all following their team because of the illusion that the players were as loyal to their university. That fallacy has been brought out into the light and exposed, and the players shown to be mercenaries playing for the higher bidder, destroying the illusion of the common love by the fan and the players for the university.I get what you’re saying but if it was going to die out as a less than premium product to the NBA why wouldn’t it have done that already? To me, I don’t think that many people view the product differently now that kids are getting paid & it’s allowed. Will there be more roster turnover? Sure, but the fans of college basketball have school affiliation. Do I love having players I can watch grow and develop for multiple years? Yes, but more than that I’m an Illinois fan and I was during the John Groce era when I wasn’t a fan of our rosters some years.
I will be interested to see if the transferring starts to regulate and becomes less in future years though.
I share your frustration. However, there is no chance that high major schools abandon athletics for reasons not limited to the following:It didn't die out as a less than premium product because it was "college" basketball, and had a built in audience of millions consisting of alumni, die hard fans, and casual fans, all following their team because of the illusion that the players were as loyal to their university. That fallacy has been brought out into the light and exposed, and the players shown to be mercenaries playing for the higher bidder, destroying the illusion of the common love by the fan and the players for the university.
I stated some months back that I wondered how long university presidents are going to allow AD's, coaches, and now GM's to control millions of $ outside the purview of the university. I would not be surprised at all if the colleges decided that athletics were not part of it's core mission of education anymore, and simply terminated athletics.
This is exactly the sort of reason I am a fan of NIL (if not necessarily it's implementation). There was such a double standard. Most people don't voluntarily quit their job without some ideas where they're landing the next one.
So is Geoff staying and there is no shakeup coming?
1. Personally I don’t think a top/driving factor behind most die hard fans following college teams is that players had loyalty to their programs. Are you going to stop following Illini sports?It didn't die out as a less than premium product because it was "college" basketball, and had a built in audience of millions consisting of alumni, die hard fans, and casual fans, all following their team because of the illusion that the players were as loyal to their university. That fallacy has been brought out into the light and exposed, and the players shown to be mercenaries playing for the higher bidder, destroying the illusion of the common love by the fan and the players for the university.
I stated some months back that I wondered how long university presidents are going to allow AD's, coaches, and now GM's to control millions of $ outside the purview of the university. I would not be surprised at all if the colleges decided that athletics were not part of it's core mission of education anymore, and simply terminated athletics.