College Sports (Basketball)

#206      
That's a bold strategy, Mark. Real glad this isn't us. What an absolute goober.

Cringe GIF


cringe
 
#213      
He may have a reputation of being a goober, but I am impressed that he actually responded to a couple of negative questions about Kentucky's portal failures.
Glad Brad doesn't need to do this.
 
#221      
here is the first ESPN bracketology with the new format. Illinois got a 1 seed but I still hate the expansion

All the changes, all the time passed, and we still end playing Kentucky in Kentucky.

1778190932850.png


Edit: and what a loaded region! 1 - Illinois 2 - Arizona 3 - Gonzaga 4 - Alabama 5 - Iowa State
 
#222      
This is really helpful for me to visualize what the changes actually mean.

TL/DR: I think this system improves the 10-16 seeds compared to what they would be under the system that's been in place.

The extra 15/16 play-ins weed out more of the worst autobid teams, bump the ~12-14 seeds one spot to ~13-15, and create room for 4 additional at-large teams in the R64 as ~12 seeds. If teams are (theoretically) selected by resume but seeded more in line with efficiency, the extra 11/12 play-ins shift more teams with good resumes but poor metrics into these play-ins, leaving better teams as 10/11 seeds (some of the additional 8 at-large teams will likely have better efficiency ranks than a bunch of the teams ahead of them in the resume rankings used for selection).

If I'm thinking about this correctly, it also creates an awkward void for autobid teams around the 12 seed line- they are exempt from the 11/12-seed at-large play-in games, right? If so, they have to be moved to either 13 or 11.
 
Back