High school, too.we all know it’s going to happen this way . 24 or 32 teams
they do it this way in every other NCAA division
High school, too.we all know it’s going to happen this way . 24 or 32 teams
they do it this way in every other NCAA division
Brother, if you knew me you would know that this could not be more true.I have a feeling you turned 35 at 15
Love the DA attachment (it is brilliant and reminds me of the old George Carlin bit - anyone driving slower than you is an idiot and anyone driving faster is a maniac), but could not disagree more with your #1.I have a feeling you turned 35 at 15
View attachment 50348
A 24/32 team playoff has downsides, sure. Bowls become even more meaningless than they already are and maybe even obsolete.
That sucks.
But, there’s upsides too.
1. Illinois. Yes, that Illinois. Would have made the playoffs two years ago. The level of joy I would personally have by watching Illinois football play in the playoffs, even if we got smoke by 20, would dwarf every bowl game since the Rose Bowl.
2. And it’s not just Illinois. 40-50 teams each year will have a realistic shot of making the playoffs. That adds significance and meaning to an extra hundred regular season games.
3. Is Texas vs Ohio St as valuable? Not quite. Because it doesn’t impact whether or not they’ll make the playoffs. But, at least they’ll continue to play the game! As it stands now, the incentive to play big games like that has been eroded because there’s too much risk in a loss.
4. It’ll add parity to college football. The more teams that have a realistic shot of making the playoffs, the more teams that are able to recruit based on that. You don’t have to go to Ohio State to play in the playoffs, kids.
Again, there are downsides. It’s not perfect. But I think there are enough upsides to justify it.
agree - 100% weak sauce.more weak sauce:
these guys have nothing on Pravda
20+ years of saying their top is better, now that they (relatively) stink, it's that their bottom is better. Pathetic bunch of losers.agree - 100% weak sauce.
Also, "our bottom is harder than theirs." C'mon, this is a family friendly website.
At the top, middle, and bottom the Big Ten has just been more quick and intelligent in adapting to the new college football landscape, and that's paying dividends.more weak sauce:
these guys have nothing on Pravda
I don't think that his point is THAT far off. It's an 18 team league that has a clear line in talent gaps.more weak sauce:
these guys have nothing on Pravda
For all the damage NIL has inflicted, it did decisively sweep away the SEC’s recruiting edge.The system under which SEC teams always had the size/speed/depth advantage on everybody just doesn't apply anymore.
If a certain Mr Anderson does end up transferring to Illinois within the next couple of seasons, there is either a major us problem or a major him problem…Kiffin is such a hard guy to appreciate at any level - personal or professional.
Ole Miss fandom has every right to be super upset with him - then again, it’s no surprise and they knew he was that way when they hired him from FAU. Always looking for the BBD . always looking for excuses
Yep, the rest of the teams around the country can pay their players too.For all the damage NIL has inflicted, it did decisively sweep away the SEC’s recruiting edge.
Taking out a second mortgage on my beach house to bet against that absurd Whittingham placement.yet another very debatable list, but pretty good, IMO:
food for thought, anyway
Pat Fitzgerald, Michigan St., two spots ahead of Eli Drinkwitz, also Michigan St.?yet another very debatable list, but pretty good, IMO:
food for thought, anyway
Mizzouchigan State, a safety school simply too powerful to existPat Fitzgerald, Michigan St., two spots ahead of Eli Drinkwitz, also Michigan St.?![]()
Barry Odom & Purdue, the ungarnished cottage cheese of the leagueyet another very debatable list, but pretty good, IMO:
food for thought, anyway
Just looking from a very high level on these financials shared and assuming I'm understanding this correctly, B1G revenue is $360 M greater than SEC's, but the per team distributions is only $6 M higher per team? For clean numbers assume we split 360/18 - that's $20M. I know there are costs that have to come out of all of this but is the SEC running that much more efficiently/lean than B1G?
Wait, does "separate the schools" mean having the universities and their athletic departments be legally and financially separate entities or something else?he's not wrong:
I think a top tier split is inevitable. Gonna be very interesting if dogs and cats (BIG and SEC) can agree on a plan or go separate ways