We have a lot of "guys" on the pitching staff. No #1 or #2. Every starter has the same repertoire.
Yeah the starting pitching is in a really interesting spot. A lot depth and options, little in proven high end performance.
You've got your two anchors:
Taillon - 31 - 3.91 ERA in 177.1 innings last year, 3.84 in 782.2 for career
Stroman - 32 - 3.50 in 138.2, 3.62 in 1167
Two veterans that you really don't know what you're going to get:
Hendricks - 33 - 4.80 in 84.1, 3.46 in 1312.2
Sampson - 31 - 3.11 in 104.1, 4.43 in 292.2
Can Hendricks get healthy and effective again? How much of Sampson's two seasons with the Cubs was an illusion and how much was real?
And then a ton of younger, less experienced guys that are promising, but not proven, weren't particularly highly rated by observers outside of the Cubs' system, and none besides Wicks picked higher than the 3rd round of the draft:
Thompson - 28 - 3.76 in 115, 3.64 in 168.1
Steele - 27 - 3.18 in 119, 3.53 in 176
Kilian - 26 - 4.22 in 106.2 in AAA
Assad - 25 - 3.11 in 37.2 in MLB debut
Wesneski - 25 - 2.18 in 33 in MLB debut
Brown - 23 - 3.38 in 104 in AA
Wicks - 23 - 3,80 in 94.2 in A+, AA
Taillon and Stroman are definitely in the rotation. Steele is most likely in, too. You figure Hendricks is, assuming he's healthy. After that, Sampson, Thompson, Assad and Wesneski all look like they're competing to be #5, with #6 also likely to get a lot of innings because there's no one in the top 5 guaranteed to get you 150 healthy innings. And still, you'd like to bring in someone else who'd give you 170+ high end innings.
You certainly wonder if they could trade some quantity for quality here.