He went from one of the most annoying players to watch (because he'd consistently cook us) to one of the best announcers to listen to. Hope he calls a ton of our games this season.
Last year they released the times on 9/22, but in 2021 it was on 10/5. Seems likely they'll announce them this week or next.When do the times for games usually come out?
Thanks!Last year they released the times on 9/22, but in 2021 it was on 10/5. Seems likely they'll announce them this week or next.
Well, for a guy like Tang the question is buy out.Not to open anything back up, but Brad's agent got him a heck of a contract based on this: https://www.kstatesports.com/news/2...gree-to-extension-through-2029-30-season.aspx
An unfortunate change IMO. I thought it was great for the referee to be able to show the offending players number visually. Now they will either need to show the digits in sequence, or move to a system using the thumb as a five.Saw an Ant Wright tweet that players can now wear any number 0-99!
...
(Given my age, the first season I truly remember was 2001, for reference.)McBride Joins EIU Men's Basketball Staff - Eastern Illinois University Athletics
Eastern Illinois men's basketball head coach Marty Simmons has announced the addition of Rich McBride as an assistant coach on the Panthers staff along with a changeeiupanthers.com
Many of you will remember Rich McBride
McBride Joins EIU Men's Basketball Staff
The Gavitt games just doesn’t excite me like the B1G-ACC Challenge did. Perhaps if it were the old Big East I knew growing up, but the current version feels like a B1G-Patriot League Challenge or something.
I kind of agree, but we really need some type of "challenge," IMO. It gives you a baked-in Power Six opponent, and you don't have to worry about scheduling logistics every year to make sure fans have an exciting game. For example, I bet it took a decent amount of effort to set up our recent home-and-home series with Arizona and Tennessee, whereas the DIA didn't have to do a thing for the Big Ten/ACC Challenge or the Gavitt Games.The Gavitt games just doesn’t excite me like the B1G-ACC Challenge did. Perhaps if it were the old Big East I knew growing up, but the current version feels like a B1G-Patriot League Challenge or something.
I don’t disagree about needing some sort of conference challenge, but I don’t pay attention to the other games in the Gavitt Games like I did the B1G-ACC Challenge (other than they’re B1G teams playing a game). Against the ACC, I cared if Northwestern beat Wake Forest or if Penn State beat Clemson. Those games mattered because I wanted the B1G to win the challenge. I can’t tell you which conference “won” any of the Gavitt Games.I kind of agree, but we really need some type of "challenge," IMO. It gives you a baked-in Power Six opponent, and you don't have to worry about scheduling logistics every year to make sure fans have an exciting game. For example, I bet it took a decent amount of effort to set up our recent home-and-home series with Arizona and Tennessee, whereas the DIA didn't have to do a thing for the Big Ten/ACC Challenge or the Gavitt Games.
With that said, I am still shocked that there was not a Big Ten/Big XII Challenge announced recently. We're both FOX-affiliated conferences, right?? Using the new conferences, you could get some great matchups from this hypothetical lineup I came up with on the spot (Northwestern and Minnesota get the boot for finishing at the bottom of the standings, lol):
Illinois vs. Arizona (shocking amount of history in the last 25 years)
Indiana vs. Houston (Kelvin Sampson angle)
Iowa vs. Oklahoma State (wrestling royalty)
Maryland vs. Iowa State (both pretty good in the last 25 years, both majorly insecure)
Michigan vs. Kansas State (another random-ish one)
Michigan State vs. Baylor (both good, both green, two of the longest tenured coaches)
Nebraska vs. Colorado (border rivalry)
Ohio State vs. Cincinnati (instate rivalry)
Oregon vs. Utah (former Pac-12 matchup)
Penn State vs. West Virginia (border rivalry)
Purdue vs. Texas Tech (both recently good)
Rutgers vs. UCF (some matchup had to be random...)
UCLA vs. Kansas (only two real Blue Bloods)
USC vs. Arizona State (former Pac-12 matchup)
Washington vs. TCU (purple...)
Wisconsin vs. BYU (the Mormons come to Mad Town)
(Iowa/Iowa State is already a regular game, so it couldn't be wrapped up in the Challenge.)
No to be clear, I totally agree. The Big Ten and the Big East are just too different in a number of ways ... the Big East is smaller, the schools are fundamentally different, the current group is way newer, etc. A lot of Big Ten fans, especially those over 35, will still view many of those Gavitt opponents with the excitement they would view a good mid-major ... because that's what a lot of them were for many of the years of our fandoms.I don’t disagree about needing some sort of conference challenge, but I don’t pay attention to the other games in the Gavitt Games like I did the B1G-ACC Challenge (other than they’re B1G teams playing a game). Against the ACC, I cared if Northwestern beat Wake Forest or if Penn State beat Clemson. Those games mattered because I wanted the B1G to win the challenge. I can’t tell you which conference “won” any of the Gavitt Games.
Rees Woodcock has Quincy Guerrier getting the start over Dain Dainja in Rees's projected starting lineup. Rees had CH starting at #5, where CH would be a #4 if Dainja starts. Any comments on this? (I figured Dainja would start most games, especially against bigger and heavier centers, like most teams have.)
Does mentioning a thing Woodcock said (that the poster doubts) and asking if anyone has comments count as "citing as an authority" now?Citing Woodcock as an authority? Face palm.
I hope Hawkins works with Dain on post moves this off-season and becomes more aggressive around the rim.1. Rodgers
2. Shannon Jr.
3. Domask
4. Goode
5. Hawkins
I'd bet money that is our starting 5 pretty much all year - assuming no injuries and won't be adjusted based on matchups, because Underwood has never done that
1. Rodgers
2. Shannon Jr.
3. Domask
4. Goode
5. Hawkins
I'd bet money that is our starting 5 pretty much all year - assuming no injuries and won't be adjusted based on matchups, because Underwood has never done that