I hope all you Ty at point guard haters on here have the guts to admit you are wrong when he turns out good.
I hope all you Ty at point guard haters on here have the guts to admit you are wrong when he turns out good.
What are you even talking about? I just provided data that suggested fans saying that they expect Illinois to finish in the top 4 in the B10 most years aren't wrong based on that being the standard the teams has set over the past 20 years. Now if you want to argue Illinois' performance in the 70s should have an appreciable impact on current fans expectations, I guess that's your right, but what?So you take the best 16 year period of Illinois basketball (and that was really the work of 2 coaches over a 7 year period who left for greener pastures at the first opportunity), out of its 117 year history and that is the standard for Illinois basketball.
We have won 8 championships in the last 70 years - that is about 1 in 9 not even remotely close to 1 in 4, nor sustained success as you claim. Lou Henson, that guy with his name on the court at State Farm Center, won 1 conference championship. He also only made the tourney 12 of 21 years and lost the first game in 5 of those 12 years. In his defense the field was 32 in 1975, 40 in 1979, 48 in 1980 and then expanded to 64 in 1985 - he made 2 tourneys with the field at 48, the rest when it was 64.
So again, your standard is one which no B1G team meets in the present era. It is a standard which we only met for a very brief period in our history. Hope you can enjoy being an unhappy fan because if you are a long term fan of the Illini, you will be most of the time given your standards.
If you are young, I forgive you, but I have been following the Illini since Harry Combes was the coach. If we play well enough to make the tourney, I consider it a successful season, anything more is gravy for me.
Also interesting that for the last 16 years of Henson, the Top 4 in B10 hit rate was also 12 in 16 (75%).To further your point, here are the hit rates of our past several coaches in terms of a Top 4 B10 finish and a B10 championship:
Underwood: Top 4 (3 of 6 - 50%) Champ (1 of 6 - 17%)
Groce: Top 4 (0 of 5 - 0%) Champ (0 of 5 - 0%)
Weber: Top 4 (6 of 9 - 67%) Champ (2 of 9 - 22%)
Self: Top 4 (3 of 3 - 100%) Champ (2 of 3 - 67%)
Kruger: Top 4 (3 of 4 - 75%) Champ (1 of 4 - 25%)
So if we exclude Groce, who was clearly a poor hire, in the 16 seasons prior to Groce, the combined trio of Kruger-Self-Weber had a Top 4 in B10 hit rate of 12 in 16 (75%) and a B10 Champ hit rate of 5 in 16 (31%). Underwood started with a much lower floor than those coach and so if you omit his first 2 years as Groce adjacent, he's basically right on that average.
Overall, the expectation that we finish in the Top 4 of the B10 each season and compete for a B10 championship year in and year out is fairly justified by the numbers. Basically 3 out of every 4 years we should be a Top 4 B10 team and we should win a B10 Championship at least 1 out of every 4 years. That's pretty much program standard. This isn't our football team where saying "I expect a Top 4 finish in B10 play" is wonderful to desire but just isn't supported in any way by our past 25years of play. It's our basketball team, which over the past 25 seasons, Groce excluded, has pretty much shown that desiring a B10 title contender most seasons should be the standard. When you have sustained success, the bar for your program should be much higher than a program with average or no success.
So, just to summarize, unless you are a fan who thinks our basketball team under Groce is a more representative sample of Illinois basketball than Kruger-Self-Weber-Underwood, then your expectation should be competing for B10 titles and Top 4 conference finishes year in and year out, because that's what those coaches have delivered.
As we get older, it's good to have a hobby. BW chose his hair.Bubbles going for the tousled bed head look.
Standing up to be recognized. I am absolutely one of the non-believers.I hope all you Ty at point guard haters on here have the guts to admit you are wrong when he turns out good.
Harry Combes won the conference in 20% of his seasons.If you are young, I forgive you, but I have been following the Illini since Harry Combes was the coach. If we play well enough to make the tourney, I consider it a successful season, anything more is gravy for me.
So I think the key to this point, and maybe the season, is what happens next. If Ty at PG is Jaylon Tate 2.0 (unguarded, leaving 4 on 5), we have a big problem. I think (hope) the difference is that Ty will take that 10-foot cushion and run up on it, then ‘booty-ball’ the next 6-8 feet to a good shot for him.Standing up to be recognized. I am absolutely one of the non-believers.
Derek Harper, Kiwane Garris and Deron Williams constitute my gold standard when it comes to premiere Illini point guards. I love Ty to death and I believe we can easily finish in the Top 4 of the conference with the current roster.......with a 5 seed or better in the NCAA tourney.
However, I've yet to see Ty hit any type of shot beyond 8 feet from the basket. I expect opposing defenses to sag way off, forcing us to play 4 on 5 basketball.
Perhaps I'm wrong and we'll see a Kendall Gill type of Sophomore jump!!
So, this is getting ridiculous about Ty's ability to make free throws. Here we are, not even one game into the schedule, and some are close to calling him a failure if he misses a free throw in determining winning or losing a game. It's been noted in several previous posts that each team member practices numerous free throws before practice, during practice, and after practice in attempting to correct a team weak spot. Give the guy a break - what happens will happen when they actually play a real game, I guess we'll see. ILL...My biggest concern with Ty is in tight games late. Even if he is good enough against pressure, it still means that our best ball handler can't shoot free throws well. Hopefully, he has improved his FT shooting, but the above stats from high school don't inspire confidence. This is where having multiple decent ball handlers on the court with him will be a must. IMHO only
I have you screenshotted - you have the guts to admit you were wrong if he turns out bad?
You betcha
And dancing.As we get older, it's good to have a hobby. BW chose his hair.
Also interesting that for the last 16 years of Henson, the Top 4 in B10 hit rate was also 12 in 16 (75%).
Harry Combes won the conference in 20% of his seasons.
*I was not alive to see Harry Combes's cagers play. I don't know if that makes me young or not. I know only that I am always tired and public TikToking makes me irrationally angry. But I hope you'll forgive me anyway.
I take it you didn't like that half-court pass CH tried to throw to the one-shoe'd MM against Arkansas.I don’t think we’re going to be an amazing FT shooting team, especially with TY at PG. I think we could be average, and that’s fine. 3pt shooting I think we will definitely be better than last year, but still around average if not a little above average.
All I want, please, PLEASE, is enough with the STUPID turnovers. I found those way more aggravating than poor shooting.
Judging from your username, you probably were watching in a snowstorm.Of course, that was back when watching a game on TV was like watching basketball played in a snowstorm.
1. Statistically what you're saying is only true if you don't consider the strength of said teams you're adding. As an extreme example say the B10 were to have expanded by adding four Div 2 teams to the conference. Nobody would say that adding them would dramatically increase Illinois' expected losses in a given season. Similarly, Penn State (Top 4 - 3 of 31), Nebraska (Top 4 - 2 of 12), Rutgers (Top 4- 1 of 9), and Maryland (Top 4 - 4 of 9) haven't exactly been threats to upper tier B10 teams outside of Maryland. Saying it would have been much more difficult for his Illini to finish Top 4 if the B10 has 14 teams instead of 10 is disingenuous due to 3 of those teams historically only finishing Top 4 in the B10 a combined 6 times in 52 total seasons (12%). I will give you Maryland though and based on those teams hit rates, finishing Top 4 in the Lou era is probably similar to finishing Top 4.5 in this era.1. Also have to consider that a top 4 finish for Lou isn't the same as it is for BU today. Lou had to finish ahead of 6 teams for a top 4 finish. Today BU has to finish ahead of 10 teams to do so (just slightly statistically more difficult than a top 3 finish for Lou).
2. Don't get me wrong. I want Illinois to excel, but just not going to start calling for the coaches' head if we are going to the tourney nearly every year (every 4 out of 5).
So, this is getting ridiculous about Ty's ability to make free throws. Here we are, not even one game into the schedule
Concerning FT shooting, I absolutely agree that thinking Ty can even become a 60/65% FT shooter next year is a long shot. No way of spinning that—it’s a problem.He shot 51% in hs. He shot less than that last year. If that's not a weakness, we'll have to agree to disagree. Whether it's manageable or not is a fair question, but I think it's overly optimistic to expect even a 10% improvement, which would still probably take him out of most late game situations.
PG is going to be a concern right up until it's proven otherwise. And we're all rooting for Ty, DGL, Moretti, and the PG by committee group. More than that, the entire team chemistry seems a lot better, and has more maturity. So I think even if there is weaknesses, the team will be a lot more fun to watch and root for.