Illini Basketball 2025-2026

Status
Not open for further replies.
#251      
If only the athletic department just got a major donation... say 100MM? And listen the status quo may be good enough for you. I think you have been very clear about it. But a lot of donors are sick and tired of watching mediocre coaching. Talent is there; coaching is not. Cal got ran out of Kentucky for doing way more than Brad ever has. I know the expectations were very low around here when BU took over, however Josh is different, he's not going to get complacent. And that's exactly what BU is right now.

They're so sick and tired of it that they pooled the money together to give him basically a lifetime extension

You're dululu

Mood Loco GIF by Pingu
 
#253      
SmI never got that mindset tbh. He's had 1 team that has outperformed their preseason expectations. 1 in 9 years. I get that people are excited and what to believe we have our Izzo or self. But nothing I've seen the past few years would lead me to believe that. I think we have a good coach, who is a terrible gameday coach, but an elite recruiter. Is that really worth a top 15 salary in the sport? idk...

Michigan is top 5 in year 2 of their new coach. It doesn't take long to turn things around when done right.
This has to be a meme at this point… :ROFLMAO:

You know what I’d like… if we do ultimately find our way to the sweet sixteen after ALL of this, can I link this thread’s past few pages as well as the Nebby postgame in the postgame thread of our tourney win? This team will absolutely deserve a look back at this fairytale. The reaction to this loss genuinely might be the worst to a single game I can remember here (yes, I’m aware that’s a high bar): worse than Loyola, worse than UConn, worse than any game last year (mayyybe Duke?), maybe even worse than the Penn State blown lead. Matter of fact the first two were more-so grief, not exactly a full swath of naysayers. All for a buzzer beater loss in mid December to a top 20 team. And it’s not like we’re Marquette either: this is after quad 1 wins over Tennessee, Texas Tech, and a road win over Ohio State and STILL being ranked #18 in today’s poll.

My honest opinion is that this is due to it being Nebraska. If this were same team, same personnel, same record, ranking, etc… just change the jersey to Michigan State, I don’t think people would react this way.

And lastly, how… just how is this “1 in 9” saying literally ANY credible? This year… this current year… is Brad’s 9th season at Illinois. So… to make this any relevant, we are either a) labeling whatever happens this season as somehow irrelevant or b) declaring it a lost season, and a no shot to make a sweet sixteen. How on god’s green earth is that a fair judgement on the behalf of Brad?

And it still wouldn’t make any sense because the 2020 season was cut short due to the pandemic - we were a projected 4 seed and would’ve been a favorite, at least seed wise, to make the second weekend.

I promise all of this is not directed at the mere one post above, as there have been plentiful making consisting of the exact same remarks and ideologies. It’s just this is the latest to pop in my notifications.

I’m just hopeful all the vehement criticism - both here and elsewhere and in the locker room - can somewhat lend the team in the positive direction, at least from a motivation standpoint. A repeat of one of our 2021 or 2023 Mizzou blowouts would be oh-so sweet 😊.
 
Last edited:
#255      
I came here to read about our new player and instead just find dumb posts about our coach? Like Brad is here forever find a new team if you don’t like it. So sick of fans creating constant negativity
 
#256      
This has to be a meme at this point… :ROFLMAO:

You know what I’d like… if we do ultimately find our way to the sweet sixteen after ALL of this, can I link this thread’s past few pages as well as the Nebby postgame in the postgame thread of our tourney win? This team will absolutely deserve a look back at this fairytale. The reaction to this loss genuinely might be the worst to a single game I can remember here (yes, I’m aware that’s a high bar) - worse than Loyola, worse than UConn, worse than any game last year (mayyybe Duke?), maybe even worse than the Penn State blown lead. Matter of fact the two in the tourney were more-so grief, not exactly a full swath of naysayers. All for a buzzer beater loss in mid December to a top 20 team. And it’s not like we’re Marquette either: this is after quad 1 wins over Tennessee, Texas Tech, and a road win over Ohio State and STILL being ranked #18 in today’s poll.

My honest opinion is that this is due to it being Nebraska. If this were same team, same personnel, same record, ranking, etc… just change the jersey to Michigan State, I don’t think people would react this way.

And lastly, how… just how is this “1 in 9” saying literally ANY credible? This year… this current year… is Brad’s 9th season at Illinois. So… to make this any relevant, we are either a) labeling whatever happens this season as somehow irrelevant or b) labeling this year as a lost season as a no shot to make a sweet sixteen. How on god’s green earth is that a fair judgement on the behalf of Brad?

And it still wouldn’t make any sense because the 2020 season was cut short due to the pandemic - we were a projected 4 seed and would’ve been a favorite, at least seed wise, to make the second weekend.

I promise all of this is not directed at the mere one post above, as there have been plentiful making consisting of the exact same remarks and ideologies. It’s just this is the latest to pop in my notifications.

I’m just hopeful all the vehement criticism - both here and elsewhere and in the locker room - can somewhat lend the team in the positive direction, at least from a motivation standpoint. A repeat of one of our 2021 or 2023 Mizzou blowouts would be oh-so sweet 😊.
Feel free to share any links you’d like! Honestly, I’m not sure message board motivation will make much of a difference with this group. Saying “1 in 7” seems fair to me. The Covid-year team was really strong, but I’m just not seeing that level right now. We’re in year nine of BU, and these kinds of debates should probably be behind us. I know Narrow J (pretty sure that’s Tyler Underwood, by the way) will argue these conversations shouldn’t even be happening.

That said, from what I’ve seen in bars across the Midwest and in conversations with Illini fans, there’s a growing sense of discontent. Maybe not among die-hards on message boards, but casual fans? They’re bored. You don’t have to agree, but the average fan isn’t thrilled about a roster full of Euros going 22–13.
 
#257      
I guess whatever it takes to entertain us is fine.

Some facts though;

1) BU is going to be here at least 4 or 5 years.
2) See #1

Personally though;

1) He needs to learn how to protect the home court like it's Fort #@$%ing Knox.
2) He needs a streak of postseason successes.
3) He needs to have a streak of being ranked in the Top 10 to begin a season and pretty much maintain it through the season.

Santa Claus Smoking GIF
 
#258      
Out of curiosity, do you know how many teams have made the sweet 16 4+ times the last 10 years?

As an aside, I do find the sweet 16 cutoff somewhat funny, as if the goalposts wouldn’t then move to we need to get past the s16 - not saying you would. But many fans actually whine most about our elite 8 game
I looked it up and found a graph which I didn’t fact check but there were 9 teams listed. Seems a reasonable expectation that IL could be on the fringe of that kind of list. And we were in 2000 to 2005 where we went E8 S16 R32 S16 and title game in a 5 year stretch. It can be done. Maybe 3/10 is more realistic but we aren’t hitting that either given the 1/5 hit rate so far with brads tourney teams.
 
#259      
Last edited:
#260      
Because it's the most recent information I can find. If you can find real info that puts us at top 15 in NIL that's more recent, I'd love to see it.
There really isn't much reliable info on NIL at all, and even that article mentioned they're leaving teams out that should be on that list. There's not much transparency with this stuff, but I do know Illinois basketball has great support and our finances put us on a playing field above most other D1 programs.
 
#261      
1 in 9 is factual. I did also add in my post that I'd legit wipe out the first 3 years cause he did inherit a garbage program. And even eliminating the covid year he is at 1 sweet 16 in 5 years. Yes it was an elite eight but the way that run ended was so bad. I'd give 1 S16 in 5 years at IL to be at the passable level but certainly not what the program could achieve. Also, the 2021 end of year loss to Loyola was so inexplicably bad. Not the loss per se but Porter Moser made Brad look silly for 40 minutes that day.

This program could reasonable make a S16 3 or 4 out of 10 years & when clicking reach that level multiple years in a row. It has happened before.

I'm not calling for him to be fired. It certainly wouldn't happen barring a couple bad years in a row. It is very troubling though that there is a recurring pattern of buzzkill home losses every year under Brad. Games like Saturday where we appear woefully unprepared to play at the game's start. We did "right the ship" but still came up short. These losses turn a 2 seed into a 5, 3 seed into a 6, etc that leads to a much more difficult path in March for a coach that has not proven to be a tactical genius.

This season appears to be shaping up to be another one of those 24-10 type seasons. 6 seed & home by the first weekend. Not awful by any stretch but the program should aspire to more IMO.

For reference, in the last 70 years, we have made the Sweet Sixteen a total of 13 times. We have reached the Sweet Sixteen a total of 4 times in a decade twice in those seventy years (80's and 00's). In the other 50 years, we made it a total of five times all together for a once a decade average, which BU has already met. If BU makes it once in the next four years, he will have outperformed the Illini in 5 of the last seven decades preceding his time here. BU has also taken us to the tourney 6 times (if you include Covid year) this decade, which puts him in third place for tourney appearances out of the last 9 decades and he has four more seasons to go (I understand that the tourney field was smaller pre-mid 80s).

BU has already won as many conference tourney championships as his predecessors combined. You talk about other coaches - let's talk Painter - he lost to a 13, 15 and 16 seed in 3 consecutive NCAA tourneys. Brad has lost to a lower seed - once. And Purdue just got shellacked by 40 on their home court. If Painter was the Illini head coach, he would be gone by the standards people set here. Painter in one game ahead of BU in B1G play from the 2020 season to date considering our loss to Nebraska. They are both more than 10 conference wins ahead of Izzo (another of your allegedly superior coaches) during that time.

IMHO anyone that complains about the state of Illinois Men's Basketball has too high of expectations. We had an exceptionally great run in the Kruger, Self early Weber era, for which I give Lon Kruger a lot of the credit, but catching lightning in a bottle is not the year in year out expectation.
 
#262      
Dude... no offense that is one of the craziest statements ever. You need to actually do some research on these coaches. He's not even in the top 20 in career accolades. And you said "half my list". So which 9 coaches have done less than BU on this list?

Are we talking about all time accomplishments or who is better now/within the last five years? Because originally we were talking about since COVID, more importantly, comparing BU to who we could hire to replace him. A lot of the people you listed are 1) not realistic hires for a variety of reasons or 2) guys who did a thing many years ago but have been worse than BU in recent years.
self - Natty
OK. Do you think we can hire him? Also, this is his last 3 seasons:

1000018430.jpg


hurley -Natty
Yes. Chances we can hire him?

Sampson - 3 FF's, 1 natty app
He available?

may- 1 FF
Yeah he had a great run with FAU. Granted.
And he could well eclipse BU one day. But he's one season into his tenure at UM. There was a time where it looked like Juwan Howard might end up being more successful than BU too.
Izzo- natty
Yep, sure. Any chance we can hire him?

painter - 1 FF, 1 natty app

Besides the fact that this is essentially the same accomplishment listed twice, it took him 19 seasons to reach that height. Also, sure I'd hire him. Do you think that's realistic?
beard - 1 FF, 1 natty app
Pre-Covid. Since then, he has accomplished less than BU. Even missed the tourney entirely twice.

1000018432.jpg


Cronin -1 FF
Sure, but in last 2 seasons it's looked a lot like he's lost his mojo and his team is not looking better than us so far this year.

oats - 1 FF
Ok, can we get him?

Llyod - 3 sweet 16's
Elite 8 is better, no?

Pitino - 2 natties
A million years ago. His 2-seed team made it exactly as far us last season, and the last time he made the second weekend was a full decade ago (and that got vacated).

golden - 1 natty
And terrible start this season, also he's not available.

few - 1 FF, 2 natty app
Ok, realistic for us to go after him?

Drew - natty
And has failed to make the second weekend the last 4 seasons, finished 7th in the Big 12 last season.

scheyer - 1 FF
He's not leaving Duke to come here so it's kind of a moot point but could he recruit here like he does there?

cal- natty
Since Covid, you taking this over BU's results?

1765847954360.jpeg

barnes- 1 FF
Sure, I mean that FF was over 20 years ago, but more importantly I don't think we're in a million years hiring a 71 year old coach to replace BU

McDermott - 1 EE, 2 sweet 16's
Sure, but no conference titles in the time frame BU won 3. Do those mean nothing to you?
 

Attachments

  • 1000018436.jpg
    1000018436.jpg
    367.4 KB · Views: 51
  • 1000018436.jpg
    1000018436.jpg
    367.4 KB · Views: 49
  • 1000018436.jpg
    1000018436.jpg
    367.4 KB · Views: 50
#263      
There really isn't much reliable info on NIL at all, and even that article mentioned they're leaving teams out that should be on that list. There's not much transparency with this stuff, but I do know Illinois basketball has great support and our finances put us on a playing field above most other D1 programs.
Which is why when people say "Illinois is top 15 in NIL" like it's a fact, they're just making it up. And that was my point.

And there's a vast gulf between "great support...above most other D1 programs" and "top-15." If the bar is, are we performing better than "most other D1 programs," BU clears that bar with miles to spare.
 
#264      
Which is why when people say "Illinois is top 15 in NIL" like it's a fact, they're just making it up. And that was my point.

And there's a vast gulf between "great support...above most other D1 programs" and "top-15." If the bar is, are we performing better than "most other D1 programs," BU clears that bar with miles to spare.
He definitely does. But as long as we are chasing that elusive championship, we're gonna hear it lol, and i really dont have a problem with that as long as it stays respectful. Brad is a great ambassador. He set the standard himself and so did Whitman. We want to chase natty's.
 
#265      
Observing the threads over the past few days, a big thanks to these 5 posters: @the juiceman cometh, @Fly Illini Fly!, @NarrowJ, @EmeraldCityIllini, @Second place is 1st loser.

Without you all this board would be an abject disaster at the moment, as they seem to make up majority of the lone posters with a somewhat practical line of thought, and actively working to maintain a rational atmosphere on this forum.
I would like to thank all the commenters here who agree with my opinions, because if it weren't for you, everyone here would be wrong about everything all of the time.

leonardo dicaprio cheers GIF
 
#266      
Are we talking about all time accomplishments or who is better now/within the last five years? Because originally we were talking about since COVID, more importantly, comparing BU to who we could hire to replace him. A lot of the people you listed are 1) not realistic hires for a variety of reasons or 2) guys who did a thing many years ago but have been worse than BU in recent years.

OK. Do you think we can hire him? Also, this is his last 3 seasons:

View attachment 45747


Yes. Chances we can hire him?


He available?


Yeah he had a great run with FAU. Granted.
And he could well eclipse BU one day. But he's one season into his tenure at UM. There was a time where it looked like Juwan Howard might end up being more successful than BU too.

Yep, sure. Any chance we can hire him?



Besides the fact that this is essentially the same accomplishment listed twice, it took him 19 seasons to reach that height. Also, sure I'd hire him. Do you think that's realistic?

Pre-Covid. Since then, he has accomplished less than BU. Even missed the tourney entirely twice.

View attachment 45748


Sure, but in last 2 seasons it's looked a lot like he's lost his mojo and his team is not looking better than us so far this year.


Ok, can we get him?


Elite 8 is better, no?


A million years ago. His 2-seed team made it exactly as far us last season, and the last time he made the second weekend was a full decade ago (and that got vacated).


And terrible start this season, also he's not available.


Ok, realistic for us to go after him?


And has failed to make the second weekend the last 4 seasons, finished 7th in the Big 12 last season.


He's not leaving Duke to come here so it's kind of a moot point but could he recruit here like he does there?


Since Covid, you taking this over BU's results?

View attachment 45753

Sure, I mean that FF was over 20 years ago, but more importantly I don't think we're in a million years hiring a 71 year old coach to replace BU


Sure, but no conference titles in the time frame BU won 3. Do those mean nothing to you?
The biggest thing is that BU is far above most of those guys in terms of year in and year out consistency. The "just a top 25 team every year" that folks complain about - it's what you need to even have a CHANCE at those lofty F4, E8, S16 expectations in the first place. If you're missing the tournament, or simply squeaking in as a 10 seed, you're likely no where near sniffing those lofty goals.

But making it in every year as a top 5 seed almost CERTAINLY guarantees a breakthrough. Simply too many bites at the apple. And he's got a trip to the E8 to begin with (not even a full two years ago).
 
Last edited:
#267      
Which is why when people say "Illinois is top 15 in NIL" like it's a fact, they're just making it up. And that was my point.

And there's a vast gulf between "great support...above most other D1 programs" and "top-15." If the bar is, are we performing better than "most other D1 programs," BU clears that bar with miles to spare.
There is a reason we had to give up on Sarr, Constanza, etc., and it is not because we have an unlimited NIL.
 
#270      
I looked it up and found a graph which I didn’t fact check but there were 9 teams listed. Seems a reasonable expectation that IL could be on the fringe of that kind of list. And we were in 2000 to 2005 where we went E8 S16 R32 S16 and title game in a 5 year stretch. It can be done. Maybe 3/10 is more realistic but we aren’t hitting that either given the 1/5 hit rate so far with brads tourney teams.
3 second weekends per decade is a good benchmark for our program. I actually don't think 4 is unreasonable.

Slush fund scandal nuked the program in the 70s.

Then we recovered and went to four second weekends in the 80s.

Then the Pearl sanctions nuked the program in the 90s.

Then we went to four second weekends in the 2000s.

Then Weber, Groce, and Mike Thomas nuked the program in the 2010s.

Now, here we are. Stable again at last. Our history suggests that we should be able to get to four second weekends this decade. COVID took away 2020 so, three second weekends in reasonable.

Anyone who thinks that is an unreasonable expectation has a super pessimistic opinion of this program.
 
#271      
I looked it up and found a graph which I didn’t fact check but there were 9 teams listed. Seems a reasonable expectation that IL could be on the fringe of that kind of list. And we were in 2000 to 2005 where we went E8 S16 R32 S16 and title game in a 5 year stretch. It can be done. Maybe 3/10 is more realistic but we aren’t hitting that either given the 1/5 hit rate so far with brads tourney teams.

Id be curious to see that graph. I legitimately I am curious the number.

I wonder how fans now would handle the 2005 final four team, I actually think quite a few would hold it against Brad as “underachieving” since we were the tourneys first overall seed but finished second
 
#272      
I guess whatever it takes to entertain us is fine.

Some facts though;

1) BU is going to be here at least 4 or 5 years.
2) See #1

Personally though;

1) He needs to learn how to protect the home court like it's Fort #@$%ing Knox.
2) He needs a streak of postseason successes.
3) He needs to have a streak of being ranked in the Top 10 to begin a season and pretty much maintain it through the season.

Santa Claus Smoking GIF

I've been curious... does anyone know how our home record over the past few years compares to other teams?

To me it seems like home court advantage isn't as big as it used to be for many teams around the country. But I could be wrong.
 
#273      
Too many folks here have stupid high expectations. Expect in one hand and :poop: in the other and see which one fill up first. JFC, the outright stupidity/ignorance of some of the posters here is mind boggling.
 
#274      
I've been curious... does anyone know how our home record over the past few years compares to other teams?

To me it seems like home court advantage isn't as big as it used to be for many teams around the country. But I could be wrong.


A cool tool to filter data.
 
#275      
I did literally in my next sentence in that post give him a pass for his first 3 years & then just mentally skipped the covid year. Yes 2024 was great but 1 in 5 to the 2nd weekend should be at lower end of acceptable results at Illinois. I know the stretch from 07 to 19 really lowered the bar but to me it's reasonable to expect IL to make sweet sixteen maybe 4 years out of 10.

The Nebby game wasn't the be all/end all, it was just another in a troubling trend where there are several games each year where we seem unprepared to play both on the court and on the bench.

Legit top 10/15 programs should not lose at home to other than the top tier of the league. That used to be the standard at Illinois. Self lost 1 in 3 years at home. Weber's first 3 years were a high level also.

And yes, Brad builds a solid roster but he doesn't seem to be getting the results out of said roster on a consistent basis. Would a long March run change the perception. Absolutely it would. However these repeated odd losses raises my concern level that this will happen with Brad at the helm.

By no means calling for him to be fired & fully realize that wouldn't happen anyway. Just have some legitimate concerns based on the established track record. Has he done a good job at Illinois & improved the brand. Absolutely. Is he the guy that can deliver a title here someday. I have serious doubts. Would love to be wrong on that point. To me this program has a stature such that a title is a reasonable goal or expectation to shoot for & if the man in charge seems unable to deliver that, I start to question if he is the right guy for the job long term.
Welp, here's a few facts for you . . .

Illinois as the home team is 73-15 (83%) at home against all opponents since 2020. In the B1G, Purdue leads the way (makes sense because, well, Edey) at 77-7 (91.7%), followed by UCLA at 72-11(86.8%) and Michigan State at 70-14(83.3%). Purdue being the outlier, there's not much difference between the next three. In the P4 conferences, Illinois is #19 in terms of home winning %. NO ONE is undefeated at home over the past 5 seasons. We'd all love to relive the 'House of 'Paign' years, but I'd like the winning Powerball numbers for the $10B draw, thank you. It just ain't gonna happen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back