Yup. I see 7-1 with a loss coming at Carver. If we take care of business otherwise, that would put us at 15-4 (5-2). I THINK that scenario would have us as a projected 3-seed. We'd be sitting pretty going into Mackey for an opportunity at a huge Q1 W or a loss that doesn't hurt the resume.My frustration is not with Nebraska. It’s letting Nebraska come in mentally tougher and more ready to play. It’s already happened a few times this season. We’ve gotten away with winning some of those games. It’s burying ourselves down 10 plus points in both halves mostly due to effort and taking bad or lazy shots. It’s year after year of one player cooking us with either no adjustments or bad adjustments. This game hurts our chances at a regular season title, a top 4 seed in the B10 tourney, a top 3 seed in the NCAA tournament. It’s not a bad loss because it’s Nebraska. It a bad loss for a program that has high aspirations. Missing free throws has cost us 2 games this season already. We are probably going to be favored in either 7/8 or 8/8 next games depending on the Iowa game. Anything worse than 7-1 to that group of teams is completely unacceptable if this team wants to have a special season.
Hilarious to be dunking on a certain line of argument and use this as evidence.That Groce or Weber argument just drives me absolutely batsh!! crazy. Some of those people were using similar logic to want to keep Bruce around when his time had clearly run it's course. Illinois has the resources to be a consistent player on the national scene with demonstrable March success. One sweet 16 in 9 years isn't getting that job done IMO. Even if we pass his first 3 years cause he inherited a dumpster fire, 1 sweet 16 in 5 years is marginally passable.
After what we saw Saturday does not most everyone figure if a Hoiberg had the Illini roster he would outperform what Brad is doing/has done in prior years. I have no doubt.
247/Jeremy Werner picked it up, they're usually reliable.
I did literally in my next sentence in that post give him a pass for his first 3 years & then just mentally skipped the covid year. Yes 2024 was great but 1 in 5 to the 2nd weekend should be at lower end of acceptable results at Illinois. I know the stretch from 07 to 19 really lowered the bar but to me it's reasonable to expect IL to make sweet sixteen maybe 4 years out of 10.Hilarious to be dunking on a certain line of argument and use this as evidence.
Let's break this down. Of the 9 years - one of them is this current year. Precisely ZERO coaches have taken a team to a Sweet Sixteen this year. That leaves 8.
Another is the COVID year. Again, ZERO coaches took their team to a Sweet 16 that year. That leaves 7.
2 seasons were his first two seasons where he inherited a dumpster fire and nobody expected to even make the Tourney. We weren't criticizing him for failing to make the second weekend back then. We shouldn't be doing it now. That leaves 5.
So of the 5 seasons left, he made the tournament every single season, won three conference titles, and made one Elite Eight. I would agree that yes, I would have liked one or two more Sweet Sixteen's in that time span. But that's still a very good stretch, and I'm certainly not firing a coach over that.
You do realize that building a roster is one of the requirements of the job right? Do you think Brad had nothing to do with any of the players who've played for him over the last half decade?
I thought Underwood's record was better than it is so that's disappointing.Slow day at work so I decided to look at some stats on 10 coaches (compare BU to his peers). I looked at Non-Conference record against Top 25 teams (at the time they played) NOT including the NCAA Tournament. Take a guess and see if you know which coach is attached to each record:
- Coach 1 8-5
- Coach 2 4-6
- Coach 3 8-9
- Coach 4 2-4
- Coach 5 9-9
- Coach 6 0-6
- Coach 7 3-6
- Coach 8 12-4
- Coach 9 6-8
- Coach 10 6-5
EDIT: Spoiler tags did not work as I had hopedHopefully this works better
1 in 9 is factual.
Hilarious to be dunking on a certain line of argument and use this as evidence.
Let's break this down. Of the 9 years - one of them is this current year. Precisely ZERO coaches have taken a team to a Sweet Sixteen this year. That leaves 8.
Another is the COVID year. Again, ZERO coaches took their team to a Sweet 16 that year. That leaves 7.
2 seasons were his first two seasons where he inherited a dumpster fire and nobody expected to even make the Tourney. We weren't criticizing him for failing to make the second weekend back then. We shouldn't be doing it now. That leaves 5.
So of the 5 seasons left, he made the tournament every single season, won three conference titles, and made one Elite Eight. I would agree that yes, I would have liked one or two more Sweet Sixteen's in that time span. But that's still a very good stretch, and I'm certainly not firing a coach over that.
Is this where Mirk and Toni play the Eruzione and Christiansen roles, and get Tim Harrer sent home?247/Jeremy Werner picked it up, they're usually reliable.
If you think contracts matter in today's world of college sports you are crazy. The state of Louisiana is forking over 100M for two coaches' contracts lol. If a big enough name comes up Josh would tell BU how great it is to retire in Key West and send the checks with a smile every single month. We don't need a coach coaching for his retirement tour... how in the world is that acceptable?I thought the same thing. I figured this was a topic we could cross off of the list of yearly debate.
I'm guessing only some, not all, are aware of how the contract is structured. Brad isn't allowed to go/interview anywhere else for greener pastures(also a source of off-season freak out) and he was extended basically until he retires. He'll be damn near 70 when this deal is up. It's security for both sides.
This has always been a source of freak out in the off-season, but a December buzzer beating loss triggered it four months early.
Never change Loyalty. Never change.
1 in 9 is factual. I did also add in my post that I'd legit wipe out the first 3 years cause he did inherit a garbage program. And even eliminating the covid year he is at 1 sweet 16 in 5 years. Yes it was an elite eight but the way that run ended was so bad. I'd give 1 S16 in 5 years at IL to be at the passable level but certainly not what the program could achieve. Also, the 2021 end of year loss to Loyola was so inexplicably bad. Not the loss per se but Porter Moser made Brad look silly for 40 minutes that day.
This program could reasonable make a S16 3 or 4 out of 10 years & when clicking reach that level multiple years in a row. It has happened before.
I'm not calling for him to be fired. It certainly wouldn't happen barring a couple bad years in a row. It is very troubling though that there is a recurring pattern of buzzkill home losses every year under Brad. Games like Saturday where we appear woefully unprepared to play at the game's start. We did "right the ship" but still came up short. These losses turn a 2 seed into a 5, 3 seed into a 6, etc that leads to a much more difficult path in March for a coach that has not proven to be a tactical genius.
This season appears to be shaping up to be another one of those 24-10 type seasons. 6 seed & home by the first weekend. Not awful by any stretch but the program should aspire to more IMO.
If you think contracts matter in today's world of college sports you are crazy. The state of Louisiana is forking over 100M for two coaches' contracts lol. If a big enough name comes up Josh would tell BU how great it is to retire in Key West and send the checks with a smile every single month. We don't need a coach coaching for his retirement tour... how in the world is that acceptable?
Id take a look at a few of these guys Ben McCollum, Otzelberger, Pat Kelsey.
Wish List would Will Wade, Hoeiberg, McCasland
Nitpick? Half of the guys on your list have done less than BU.Like i said you can nitpick guys here or there. But the short answer is no... Brad is not performing better than similarly paid coaches. Whenever BU coaches against elite coaches/rosters, he gets shellshocked. Why when we play the big boys... Uconn, Duke, etc. We look like we don't even look like we belong on the same court, yet out coach lives in the same neighborhood.
If only the athletic department just got a major donation... say 100MM? And listen the status quo may be good enough for you. I think you have been very clear about it. But a lot of donors are sick and tired of watching mediocre coaching. Talent is there; coaching is not. Cal got ran out of Kentucky for doing way more than Brad ever has. I know the expectations were very low around here when BU took over, however Josh is different, he's not going to get complacent. And that's exactly what BU is right now.This is pure delusion
Only the biggest of the biggest money schools do this, and its not even a thing in college basketball really (football, sure)
The record buyout for college basketball is (I believe) Patrick Ewing at $12.5M... that's the record, ever, forever, for any school
Brad's buyout is more than double that at $26M (far as I recall off hand)
EDIT: This entire conversation is ignorant anyway as he's not going to be fired for being constantly ranked in the top 20-25 and making the tournament every single freaking year with an occasional deep run, just forget about it
Because it's the most recent information I can find. If you can find real info that puts us at top 15 in NIL that's more recent, I'd love to see it.How are you gonna question the age of this guy's source because its from March, claiming the numbers change so this source isnt reliable, but then cite something from April 17th to give an idea on our NIL budget when our biggest piece wasn't even committed yet? Little more consistency please. Bottom line is Brad has all the resources he needs, its time for him to show he can get enough out of his players to be a factor in March. Just like all those other coaches have proven even some with far less support.
is 1 in 7 or 1 in 9 really a difference? It all rings the same message at the end of the day
Dude... no offense that is one of the craziest statements ever. You need to actually do some research on these coaches. He's not even in the top 20 in career accolades. And you said "half my list". So which 9 coaches have done less than BU on this list?Nitpick? Half of the guys on your list have done less than BU.
Illinois is not here to just win B1G games. Brad is paid to get to the second weekend or beyond. Brad is a Round of 32 coach. He has proved that time and time again. The one second weekend we got to was an easy Round of 32 win and the will of TSJ and Domask to get past ISU. I truly believe that Brad will ever get us to another 2nd weekend. He gets out coached easily and he rarely has in game adjustments. We have no motion in our offense. We are slow to the ball and we rarely make defenses work. We can score but we cannot keep stopping ourselves from jacking an immediate 3 when we are behind. We have the lineup of a high low motion offense. But we refuse to do it. The defense is horrid. We have a guy on the bench who can flat out guard but he cannot see the floor. I hope things change but Brad will stick to his system no matter how bade it could end up.Man, some of the anti-Brad takes are just insane to me. Most Big10 wins in the last 6 years. An elite 8, 2 B10 tourney wins, and a regular season. Do I want more? Of course, but it is crazy to act like he is not doing a good job. The tournament is a crap shoot of match-ups and fluke results. Some team is on fire or you have an off night and your season ends. The key to success is to keep putting yourself in the mix. How many years was Purdue "awful in the tourney" and people ripped on Painter for it, but I am sure we can all agree he is an awesome coach. We are still top 20 in both the polls and the metrics. The sky is not falling and if that shot does not fall and we win in overtime suddenly Brad is a great coach for getting them to come back. You need to look at the overall program and not random close Q1 losses that happen to everyone.
Illinois is not here to just win B1G games. Brad is paid to get to the second weekend or beyond. Brad is a Round of 32 coach. He has proved that time and time again. The one second weekend we got to was an easy Round of 32 win and the will of TSJ and Domask to get past ISU. I truly believe that Brad will ever get us to another 2nd weekend. He gets out coached easily and he rarely has in game adjustments. We have no motion in our offense. We are slow to the ball and we rarely make defenses work. We can score but we cannot keep stopping ourselves from jacking an immediate 3 when we are behind. We have the lineup of a high low motion offense. But we refuse to do it. The defense is horrid. We have a guy on the bench who can flat out guard but he cannot see the floor. I hope things change but Brad will stick to his system no matter how bade it could end up.