Everyone agrees that BU has done awesome turning around the program, he deserves credit for BTC and BTT. Everyone loves his passion, that he wants everyday guys, pushes the players hard, and believes defense wins. We all also agree that tourney results could be better, we might benefit from a Gentry type assistant for x and o’s and strategy. These views both support BU and also suggest opportunities to improve. (Xs and Os, adjustments throughout the game, etc)
Overall, everyone agrees that the program is headed in the right direction and the best is yet to come (hopefully).
80% support the no holds barred style regarding demeanor, and if you don’t like it get the f out….we don’t want you and we will go portaling.
20% support that maybe he’d connect better if he toned it down a bit to improve team chemistry while maintaining roster stability and better connecting with players.
Why can’t the two sides have some respect for others opinions and move on?
Both opinions have merit…enough of slamming one side for being old school and the other side for thinking there may be a better way. Some don’t want social media and think it’s the devil, while others suggest to get with the times or the world will pass you by. It’s a personal preference or choice and neither is right nor wrong. It’s a personal opinion or choice.
Can we all agree that Izzo, Underwood, Tang, and Gates all are headed upward at the moment? Terrific coaches.
Well, Izzo and Underwood are old school and Tang and Gates are polar opposite as it relates to the “sideline demeanor” and communication style with players.
Can we not agree all 4 are pretty damn good coaches and stop with slamming others for having a different view pertaining to which is a better or more effective way to communicate and coach?