Illini Coaching Staff

#877      

Ransom Stoddard

Ordained Dudeist Priest
Bloomington, IL
This is chicken and egg dilemma. The thing is, you still need players to win. Even mid-major Gonzaga produced its best results ever because they has 2 burger boys, 3 top 50 players, and 7 top 100 players.

We can't take the scraps of Chicago and even if we don't get all the 5 star guys, we've gotta land 1 or 2 here and there.

I disagree. Programs can (and do) win without big-name Chicago recruits.
 
#878      
Exactly - I mean, Paris Parham is like the platonic ideal of "Chicago guy on staff" and it got us nowhere because our on-court product is bad. Which is understandable! It's not due to some House of Cards-style backroom machinations that kids are finding reasons not to go to Illinois. We are providing them with obvious, public, compelling reasons not to go to Illinois.

Did N. Irvin not say that Paris "did his job" and got Chicago guys on-campus. I think we didn't see dividends with Chicago because we weren't winning with Weber and Groce.

All things being equal, wouldn't we take a Chicago kid with similar fit and skill set over someone out of state?

Why else would Underwood and Whitman publicly speak to the importance of Chicago being a fertile recruiting ground that makes Illinois an attractive destination? I realize that they may not necessarily admit it publicly, but there's apprehension in having to "play the game" with Chicago kids and their handlers, but it's not like we don't try. I would suspect the reason why is that everyone knows that Chicago talent can put you over the top.

We need to win, period. But why does a Chicago guy on staff and winning have to be mutually exclusive?

We should be reluctant to act like we "don't need Chicago" when we'd take the talent from there in a heartbeat. In my humble opinion we need to have a Chicago guy on staff with this new administration to help defrost the relationship, but, more importantly, win.

I guess we'll see how much Chicago matters in one of these next two hires ...
 
#879      

icengineer

Southern Illinois
Did N. Irvin not say that Paris "did his job" and got Chicago guys on-campus. I think we didn't see dividends with Chicago because we weren't winning with Weber and Groce.

All things being equal, wouldn't we take a Chicago kid with similar fit and skill set over someone out of state?

Why else would Underwood and Whitman publicly speak to the importance of Chicago being a fertile recruiting ground that makes Illinois an attractive destination? I realize that they may not necessarily admit it publicly, but there's apprehension in having to "play the game" with Chicago kids and their handlers, but it's not like we don't try. I would suspect the reason why is that everyone knows that Chicago talent can put you over the top.

We need to win, period. But why does a Chicago guy on staff and winning have to be mutually exclusive?

We should be reluctant to act like we "don't need Chicago" when we'd take the talent from there in a heartbeat. In my humble opinion we need to have a Chicago guy on staff with this new administration to help defrost the relationship, but, more importantly, win.

I guess we'll see how much Chicago matters in one of these next two hires ...

But but but.... We've already had the Chicago guy on staff, PP, and it didn't help in a significant way. So what does that tell us? We Must WIN! Let's get the best possible coaching staff together, right now, and win some games. THEN we can worry about the Chicago recruiting. Not having a Chicago guy on staff doesn't mean we won't have a presence there. If we can win games and be near the top of the conference on a regular basis, couple that with Underwoods style of play, and we could have a dude from Hoboken, NJ recruit Chicago for us and do well! :thumb:
 
#880      

Ransom Stoddard

Ordained Dudeist Priest
Bloomington, IL
Ironically I think it's something like 10 out of the last 12 champions had Chicago recruits on the roster but aside from being from Chicago, what's more rare is winning without 5 star talent. UNC has at least 5 burger boys that I can think of.

For those who think we can achieve final four results without this talent, please let me know how and I'd also love to know how you're going to make the wheel and fire obsolete.

This thing has to go in phases, we (or any program) can't jump straight to a FF without spending a few years rebuilding the program (yes, I'm aware there are flukes, but we're talking about sustained success, not one-off E8 runs). To get to that regular SS/E8/FF expectation that we all have it will absolutely take big-name recruits, but it's silly IMO to think we'll get there in 2-3 years.

This is a process, and it took Lou a long, long time to build the program to where it was a regular in the top 5 of the polls in the 80's, and then a while for Kruger/Self to rebuild it to get there again in the early-mid 00's. To think that there's one magical assistant out there who can grab the big CPL recruits in 2017 and have us in the upper echelons in 2018/19 is being realistic.
 
#881      

Oldtoysrock

Sarasota, Florida
I just want our coaching staff filled out so I can sleep at night.
Exactly. Each time a new coach like Will Wade hires a great !!!'t like Tony Benford, I discover I'm suffering from "assistant coach hiring envy". At least I think that's what my psychiatrist called it.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
 
#882      
This thing has to go in phases, we (or any program) can't jump straight to a FF without spending a few years rebuilding the program (yes, I'm aware there are flukes, but we're talking about sustained success, not one-off E8 runs). To get to that regular SS/E8/FF expectation that we all have it will absolutely take big-name recruits, but it's silly IMO to think we'll get there in 2-3 years.

This is a process, and it took Lou a long, long time to build the program to where it was a regular in the top 5 of the polls in the 80's, and then a while for Kruger/Self to rebuild it to get there again in the early-mid 00's. To think that there's one magical assistant out there who can grab the big CPL recruits in 2017 and have us in the upper echelons in 2018/19 is being realistic.

That's the whole point. It's a process and in order to develop that relationship you need to have someone on staff who can connect with Chicago. Granted, Jimmy Collins was from NY, but his impact in Chicago speaks for itself. Same with Jerrance - he's from Peoria but he started to make those inroads in Chicago even though the actual return on investment wasn't 5*s. If we're trying to cultivate relationships with Chicago, why not have a guy on staff who "gets" Chicago and can make inroads.

These are all abstract arguments, so very curious to see who BU brings on board. I'd be shocked if at least 1 of the 2 positions wasn't filled by someone with Chicago ties.
 
#883      
That's the whole point. It's a process and in order to develop that relationship you need to have someone on staff who can connect with Chicago. Granted, Jimmy Collins was from NY, but his impact in Chicago speaks for itself. Same with Jerrance - he's from Peoria but he started to make those inroads in Chicago even though the actual return on investment wasn't 5*s. If we're trying to cultivate relationships with Chicago, why not have a guy on staff who "gets" Chicago and can make inroads.

These are all abstract arguments, so very curious to see who BU brings on board. I'd be shocked if at least 1 of the 2 positions wasn't filled by someone with Chicago ties.

So two of our best recruiters in Chicago weren't Chicago guys and more than likely didn't have real Chicago contacts?

We need someone that can speak the same language as the people in Chicago and has a personality that will led to allowing them in the door. After a good recruiter is in the door all bets are off. This person doesn't have to be from Chicago (though it would make it easier) and does not currently need to have Chicago ties (though it would make it easier). They need to be able to earn those ties by recruiting well in the city and having those players go on to play well at Illinois.
 
#884      
So two of our best recruiters in Chicago weren't Chicago guys and more than likely didn't have real Chicago contacts?

We need someone that can speak the same language as the people in Chicago and has a personality that will led to allowing them in the door. After a good recruiter is in the door all bets are off. This person doesn't have to be from Chicago (though it would make it easier) and does not currently need to have Chicago ties (though it would make it easier). They need to be able to earn those ties by recruiting well in the city and having those players go on to play well at Illinois.

Collins may not have been born in Chicago, but he was most certainly a Chicago guy and had plenty of connections.
 
#886      
what do you know about a guy named Ron "chin" Coleman?

He was an assitant and Bradley under Ford. He allegedly has good relationship with the Irvins. He was instrumental in both Cunningham and X. Taylor coming to Bradley.
 
#888      
I mentioned Ron Coleman over a week ago and it makes a lot of sense. He has deep ties with the Irvin's and Chicago AAU basketball. He has proven he can get top Chicago players to go to mid major and P5 lower tier programs. And he's already a UofI employee(UIC). I think they are looking around to see what's out there before they settle on an easy choice like Coleman. He would be universally accepted by the Chicago establishment and a solid hire that would pay dividends instantly. That being said, BU seems like the type who could care less about what others think and he will do whatever he wants with these hires.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
#889      
Ronnie Coleman?

a24c1b5a6f906b00cdf56af4c8aee93c.jpg
 
#891      
Coleman's time at Bradley was unfulfilling and left Bradley fans feeling like they had been swindled. Bradley fans celebrated when he left Peoria.
 
#892      
Coleman's time at Bradley was unfulfilling and left Bradley fans feeling like they had been swindled. Bradley fans celebrated when he left Peoria.

True, but Geno wasn't going to get it done even with the few 3 star recruits that Chin help reel in early on. Chin, Walker, and another key assistant could make this very interesting...
 
#893      
Bradley fan voting no to Coleman. I don't hate him. But he would be way, way, down the list.

Should be able to do better.
 
#894      

TownieMatt

CU Expat
Chicago
Anyone know what kind of reputation Orlando Antigua has? Connections to Coach Cal and a scandal at USF don't fill me with confidence.
 
#895      
Great recruiter......

Anyone know what kind of reputation Orlando Antigua has? Connections to Coach Cal and a scandal at USF don't fill me with confidence.

...recruited nationally for Pittsburgh, Memphis and Kentucky. Big reputation as a recruiter.
 
#897      
Men's BB banquet--May 1st--should be lots of juicy rumors by then. Seems rather late this year.?? I wonder who will get the Mike Henry award and not be invited??
 
#898      

whovous

Washington, DC
Men's BB banquet--May 1st--should be lots of juicy rumors by then. Seems rather late this year.?? I wonder who will get the Mike Henry award and not be invited??

A quick Google search turned up the 2014-15 banquet being held on April 13. May 1 really does seem late.
 
#900      
Looking like Orlando Antigua will be an assistant coach.. He just followed Underwood, Walker, and a bunch of the players. Also the UIHoopsRecruiting twitter account posted something on it