pruman91
- interviewing new NL's daily....I really really am
Pru after dark
the stories I could tell...................Memories , in the corner of my mind.........................................they really really are...............
Pru after dark
link?I know we give him heck, but Fran's postgame presser was gold.
Did you watch all year?Mirk was amazing. VCU is 16-1 heading into to game against our Illini. We have not proven all year we can play 40 minutes of great basketball. I hope we can come out and achieve something special. Really tough match up. We do horrible against good athletic guards. Go Illini!
You mean the historic 1.95 efficiency 2nd half? Arguably one of the MOST efficient halves in the history of the NCAA tournament? That is the standard you would want us to stay at?He’s not wrong though. Not that we played poorly, but we definitely didn’t play as well as we could have. If we played the first half the way we played the second, we win by 60.
All I can type is this: if Illinois can duplicate this second-half performance, then they will reach the E8 with a very good chance to win.
Great stat early on in the second half: lots of two pointers along with 3/5 from three-point land. BALANCE!!!!!
I know we give him heck, but Fran's postgame presser was gold.
Delete - BrimfieldBomber beat me to it. Thanks.link?
Somebody tell that WSJ sports reporter he’s an imbecile
I did not call him an embecile. But I responded something that defense is a secondary issue with Fran McCaffery coached teams, and he totally discounted that.Somebody tell that WSJ sports reporter he’s an imbecile
Way too many "non-questionable" decisions that couch coaches can see that our multi million dollar coach isn't prepared for. Thats the problem. Its indefensible and you're trying to defend it. I know this is "Illinois loyalty", but you're loyalty is to a fault right now. Those details are why people want Brad out. Its grade school stuff.This same statement could be said about every coach after every game from now until the end of time. Because:
1. No coach is perfect.
2. The general public only has access to a tiny fraction of the available information that goes into a coach making a particular decision.
3. Coaches have to make decisions before the eventual outcome occurs. Whereas fans get to judge each decision based on the eventual result after said result occurs.
And if we were to let the “couch coaches” in the game thread who are simply “questioning Brad’s dumb decisions” coach this season, we would’ve lost 20 games.
I think he’d be ok with Tournament MOPMaybe should have been co-Big 10 freshman of the year? Mirk has it going! He might just be our most valuable player at this point.
Big 10 conference has to do something about the officiating. It’s atrociousBeen a while where officiating does not come up!
I dont think we have heard a word about it? Hmmm? No mention? Why? Because when they do a good job no one talks about it! They called a very good game! We are not use to that!
Fixed it for youLoved the game.
Loved the win.
Now let's see if we can do thattimes in a row.
Well, first of all, yes. You don't? Weird to sell your team short. Why would someone say "hey, we played this well in game 1, but let's aim lower moving forward."? Of course, I'm taking your question literally, where I know you meantit this way: "you mean to tell me that if we don't play this well the rest of the tournament you'll be a hater on the team?"You mean the historic 1.95 efficiency 2nd half? Arguably one of the MOST efficient halves in the history of the NCAA tournament? That is the standard you would want us to stay at?
I mean... we played better in the second half than the first half, so we literally did not play the first half as well as we could have. In fact, most commentators and users on this forum even admited we didn't start the game well. Why did you go straight for the "I gotta get defensive" stance instead of reading the post literally?Not that we played poorly, but we definitely didn’t play as well as we could have.
Well, first of all, yes. You don't? Weird to sell your team short. Why would someone say "hey, we played this well in game 1, but let's aim lower moving forward."? Of course, I'm taking your question literally, where I know you meantit this way: "you mean to tell me that if we don't play this well the rest of the tournament you'll be a hater on the team?"
It's almost like you glossed right over the part where I said this:
I mean... we played better in the second half than the first half, so we literally did not play the first half as well as we could have. In fact, most commentators and users on this forum even admited we didn't start the game well. Why did you go straight for the "I gotta get defensive" stance instead of reading the post literally?
I mean the story is that Penn started the game playing with an intensity and physicality they couldn't sustain for 40 minutes, not least of which because their best player should have been watching from bed.He’s not wrong though. Not that we played poorly, but we definitely didn’t play as well as we could have. If we played the first half the way we played the second, we win by 60.