Illinois 90, Southern 55 Postgame

Status
Not open for further replies.
#153      
True, but we're heading into the grind of the schedule now, where every coach knows the other's tendencies, every team is physical and they'll be playing in some pretty daunting environments, which is where fatigue sets in. Fatigue causes a lot of problems that come in the form of turnovers, missed assignments, getting beat in transition, missed free throws and..........silly fouls, generally of the slap variety.

Boswell, I trust. Wagler, I don't. It simply comes down to experience.

We haven't had a game yet where the backcourt, as a unit, picked up early foul trouble. If we were to get into a situation where Boswell gets 2 and Wagler gets 2 with 5 minutes to go in the first half of a road game.....where do you go? Rolled ankles happen. Taking an elbow to the face playing MSU happens(frequently).

You can't run these guys out there 35+ minutes a night and think that it's not going to come back and cause issues on multiple occasions.

You're taking the "so far, so good" approach, which isn't a good take. Somebody needs to step up and be able to suck up some meaningful minutes in the backcourt. I think that this ship has sailed and we're going to have to default to Lee and try and survive offensively? It looks like that's the way Brad is leaning.

We have a very unique roster in which 2 thru 5 are interchangeable. There's an answer on the roster for a multitude of occurrences. At the 1.....it's the complete opposite.

In the grand scheme of things, I trust Boswell to know how to fully navigate a game, in all aspects, in all situations because he's done it a 60+ times at the highest of levels. He was flat out phenomenal for us the second half of last year.

Wagler hasn't earned that trust yet and no rational human should expect him to be at that level of having that cool, calm, composed demeanor in the midst of chaos. If we're asking him to haul 35+ minutes a night for the next 2 1/2 months and produce at a level where we're expecting him to bring us home in games....it's an irrational and unreasonable ask.

I think that most looked at the roster before the season started and saw trouble at the 1. Petrovic completely flaming out was never really a consideration. Now that it's becoming a reality....every coach in the conference is going to have a game plan of going right at the guards because if there's foul trouble, as of now, we don't have an obvious choice to turn to.
Well thought out post and I wish we would have gotten something out of Petro? But, most of the reason we are not getting much out of Petro is because KW is simply so much better than anything (frankly than ever?) we have seen out of a Freshman?

I think with these players available at the two ā€œso calledā€ guard spots KW, KB, JD, AS, and Lee we are ā€œprettyā€ good.

Remember this also assumes (which is for sure possible) that Ty does not return, as you could slate him in to a ā€œguardā€ slot?

As far as trusting Wagler, in my 58 years watching the Illini, I am not sure I have ever seen a better freshman? Many good ones, but this kid has ā€œitā€. He can play the point, he can get others involved, he rebounds, he can get tough baskets, hit 3’s what can’t he do?

I trust him! And bottom line, most every team that wins it all has a stud one and done superstar (Carmelo type) player, we may just have that in KW? You simply have to ride this kid, he plays so within himself truly amazing what he is doing?

I see what you’re saying, but I think at this point what we got is what we got? I think it might work really well if they can hit 35% from 3 are going to be tough to beat?
 
#154      
I played college basketball, I understand what I’m watching

Look I don’t think I’m being out of line by not getting all excited we scored 90 on Southern, that isn’t my point.
I will die on the hill that we won’t succeed shooting 34 threes a night and that we need more set plays to rely on in crunch time and out of dead ball situations. I’d like to see some of those at least attempted against a team like Southern that we can pull out against MSU, Purdue or whoever we play in the NCAA tournament.

At the end of the day defense and rebounding is what will make this team succeed and that’s been much much better the last two games.
I'm with you on wanting there to be a few set plays. Crunch time is one use. Calming the team is another. There have been multiple games this season where we threw away back to back possessions because the team was rattled. Calling a set play as they come up the court is a way to reintroduce discipline and let them calm down. They are executing a well known path. Everything is normal and okay.
 
#155      
This was right after an offensive rebound and put-back by Mirk. What was Underwood angry about?
Mirk was standing and watching. I don't know whether BU wanted him crashing the boards or back on defense. Standing and watching isn't the answer.
 
#156      
I'm with you on wanting there to be a few set plays. Crunch time is one use. Calming the team is another. There have been multiple games this season where we threw away back to back possessions because the team was rattled. Calling a set play as they come up the court is a way to reintroduce discipline and let them calm down. They are executing a well known path. Everything is normal and okay.

Where does this delusion that Illinois does not run any set plays come from? Sure, there is a lot of ISO stuff for certain guys because it is effective. But, its impossible to have realistic discussions when statements are so extreme/absolute (ie, Illinois NEVER runs set plays, which is obviously not true).
 
#157      
I played college basketball, I understand what I’m watching

Look I don’t think I’m being out of line by not getting all excited we scored 90 on Southern, that isn’t my point.
I will die on the hill that we won’t succeed shooting 34 threes a night and that we need more set plays to rely on in crunch time and out of dead ball situations. I’d like to see some of those at least attempted against a team like Southern that we can pull out against MSU, Purdue or whoever we play in the NCAA tournament.

At the end of the day defense and rebounding is what will make this team succeed and that’s been much much better the last two games.
This team currently has a better offensive efficiency than our ā€˜05 team (by a lot). In fact, it’s currently our most efficient offense in KenPom history.

But I guess we don’t run enough 2000s style set plays, so it’s not very good?
 
#158      
Where does this delusion that Illinois does not run any set plays come from? Sure, there is a lot of ISO stuff for certain guys because it is effective. But, its impossible to have realistic discussions when statements are so extreme/absolute (ie, Illinois NEVER runs set plays, which is obviously not true).
I'll rephrase. I wish Illinois ran set plays more often, e.g. when the team is rattled as a calming method.
 
#159      
Agree at this point.

Glass half full, though.
Petrovic and Lee were injured/ out of practice for quite some time. Missed month+ I think. Now school is out on break, and healthy, plenty of time to practice. Need game reps to keep improving. Both new to college ball. Get some minutes, learn, cut down mistakes, repeat. Schedule will change in the new year- games every 3/4 days. Will need contributions- some days KW and KB will need a break.
Here's where I feel differently. The aspects of basketball that can be improved through game rep include shooting, decision making/passing, and cohesiveness with teammates. They do not include effort, attitude, and character. The main issues that we've seen with Mihailo every time he's gotten an opportunity to play are not issues that improve with increased playing time. When Brad yanked Mihailo immediately in the first half of this game, the issue wasn't the errant pass. All players turn the ball over occasionally (although Mihailo definitely has been more casual with the ball than most). The issue was the loafing back on defense...the lack of any sort of desire to make the subsequent scoring play more difficult for our opponents with effort.

We have Brandon Lee to cover the guard spot in a pinch. Brandon has proven that his WILL play hard and give it his all out there. There's no need for us to try to carry a player whose play has shown that he won't do this.
 
#160      
After that turnover in the first half Petro had a chance to run back and try to contest. He just jogged back and chose not to. It was so obvious he was going to get pulled after that. Wtf was he thinking? How can he not know by now he has to hustle on defense?
I was surprised to see him get back in the game at all TBH.
 
#164      
This team currently has a better offensive efficiency than our ā€˜05 team (by a lot). In fact, it’s currently our most efficient offense in KenPom history.

But I guess we don’t run enough 2000s style set plays, so it’s not very good?
Most of you are totally twisting my words pretending like I’m saying our offense isn’t good or that I think Brad or Tyler is a bad coach. When did I ever say our offense wasn’t good? Oh right, I didn’t.

When we don’t shoot well from deep and we shoot 30+ 3’s a game it typically doesn’t go well for us, and that’s when we could use a few set plays (along with BLOB situations).

This portion of Loyalty who thinks you can’t criticize the staff without being put up on the cross is exhausting. I’ve applauded Brad every step of the way but that doesn’t mean I can’t ask him, his son or his staff to IMPROVE. Just like we ask of the players.

All of this from me saying the team played hard and handled their business, but the offense wasn’t perfect. I appreciate all your statistics to draw back on to prove your points, but go touch some grass. Basketball 20 years ago isn’t the same as it was today.
 
#165      
I get the point of him being a frosh... but I'm genuinely not sure what else you'd like to see him do? Drop 50?

To me - as a PG, so much of the word "trust" comes down to ball handling. He has 17 total turnovers thru 13 games (with 50 assists). That's more than proving yourself.
There is no doubt that his body of work over the first 13 games has been nothing short of awesome. He's been more than I think anyone could have expected.

That said, for years, the Big Ten grind beats down even the most experienced players and the proverbial wall gets hit. This will be the first go around for this young man. He'll have gone through nothing like it in his young basketball life. Getting through the gauntlet in some rough months, with some tough travel, in some incredibly tough venues is part of the development process, both mentally and physically.

I don't think you can prove yourself until you actually do it. At this point last year is when KJ really struggled. He became a target of defenses. We'll never know how much the forearm injury effected the rest of his year, but he went from a potential top 7 pick to free falling in the draft. His regression when it came to turning the ball over lost games.

That is my concern right now. Going into the season, I was comfortable with the season being on the shoulders of Tomi, Drej and Boswell, then have the nice supporting cast around them. Mirkovic started the season off beautifully, but he's slowly regressed to expectations, which is perfectly fine. If each individual guy can meet the expectations that we had prior to the year, we'll be fine. The problem is that Tomi has been far below expectations and we're getting nothing out of Petrovic. That load has been dropped squarely on a Freshman's shoulders and it's hard to get comfortable with that.

Its going to be absolutely fascinating to watch unfold. I'm as on edge as everyone else. I do firmly believe that the minutes expected out of KB and KW need to chill out. They really should be around 32ish minutes per game. Finding 8 minutes out of the bench should not be this troublesome, but it seems like it might be.
 
#167      
People just don’t like the style so it’s not good.
The style is high risk high reward. Maybe we can string a bunch of games together at the right time. My personal concerns have been more about making changes and responding when the style is coming dry. It happens at times.
 
#168      
Yep. Everything we do is a read based on how the defense reacts

And Tyler (wait is that you?) is always up off the bench making calls as they bring the ball up the court. The team is definitely not just out there playing pickup ball.

Really set plays dont serve you well in the long run because they are too easy to scout. Stringing together a bunch of actions is way harder for the defense because its harder to recognize and get ahead of what's happening.
 
#169      
Well thought out post and I wish we would have gotten something out of Petro? But, most of the reason we are not getting much out of Petro is because KW is simply so much better than anything (frankly than ever?) we have seen out of a Freshman?

I think with these players available at the two ā€œso calledā€ guard spots KW, KB, JD, AS, and Lee we are ā€œprettyā€ good.

Remember this also assumes (which is for sure possible) that Ty does not return, as you could slate him in to a ā€œguardā€ slot?

As far as trusting Wagler, in my 58 years watching the Illini, I am not sure I have ever seen a better freshman? Many good ones, but this kid has ā€œitā€. He can play the point, he can get others involved, he rebounds, he can get tough baskets, hit 3’s what can’t he do?

I trust him! And bottom line, most every team that wins it all has a stud one and done superstar (Carmelo type) player, we may just have that in KW? You simply have to ride this kid, he plays so within himself truly amazing what he is doing?

I see what you’re saying, but I think at this point what we got is what we got? I think it might work really well if they can hit 35% from 3 are going to be tough to beat?

Speaking to Keaton having "it", after his lone turnover yesterday he immediately went and made a pretty awesome defensive play to steal the ball right back. The dude just was not going to tolerate his own mistake and had to make up for it. Reminded me a bit of the plays where Kobe would turn it over then hustle back down the court for a chase down block.
 
#171      
#172      
Speaking to Keaton having "it", after his lone turnover yesterday he immediately went and made a pretty awesome defensive play to steal the ball right back. The dude just was not going to tolerate his own mistake and had to make up for it. Reminded me a bit of the plays where Kobe would turn it over then hustle back down the court for a chase down block.
All I know is I have been watching Illini basketball for almost 60 years, and I am not sure Frankie was ā€œall aroundā€ as good as this kid. Frankie is probably the best Freshman I can remember until now?
 
#173      
Speaking to Keaton having "it", after his lone turnover yesterday he immediately went and made a pretty awesome defensive play to steal the ball right back. The dude just was not going to tolerate his own mistake and had to make up for it. Reminded me a bit of the plays where Kobe would turn it over then hustle back down the court for a chase down block.
Dee or Deron (I think Dee) used to talk about this as well. If he made a turnover, he made it a point to try to get it back. Winning behavior.
 
#175      
I would absolutely hate to have some of you as my boss/coworkers. Top 15 offense (probably even better tbh) in the country for the last several years running and people still find time to complain......get a grip.

We're an elite offensive team, it is what it is at this point.......if anything we need to harp on our defense to continue improving because that's where we'll make the leap from a great team to one capable of winning a natty.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back